Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Water discharge-regulated bacteria-heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) interactions in the water column of the river rhine

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterotrophic nanoftagellates (HNF) make up a large fraction of the Zooplankton biomass of rivers. Their abundance can be strongly affected by water discharge, but the consequences of this highly dynamic factor for their main prey, the bacteria, is still unknown. The focus of this study was on bacterial-HNF interactions in the Lower River Rhine (Germany) with respect to the discharge-dependent dynamics. The bacterial and HNF abundances and biomasses were determined over the course of 17 months. The potential consumption of bacteria by HNF was calculated based on the biomass data and on data on the HNF production. The mean bacterial abundance in the Rhine at Cologne ranged from 0.3×106 to 3.5×106 cells mL−1 with lowest abundances in winter and highest in late spring. No significant changes in abundance during the downstream passage were found. Neither could a significant correlation be found between bacterial and HNF abundance. The ratio of bacterial to HNF abundance showed high variations which lay between 166 and 19,055 and was negatively dependent on water discharge. Monthly routine calculations on the potential bacterial consumption by HNF revealed a clearance of between 2 and 66% of the bacterial standing stock d−1. The values increased greatly with water discharge and could exceed 100% d−1 at times of high water flow. The presented data suggests a change in the top-down control of the planktonic bacteria due to the water discharge: The importance of benthic predation at low water flow (high contact probability to benfhic predators) gives way to an increased importance in predation by planktonic HNF at high water flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allan JD (1995) Stream Ecology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arndt H, Dietrich D, Auer B, Cleven EJ, Gräfenhan T, Weitere M, Mylnikov AP (2000) Functional diversity of heterotrophic flagellates in aquatic ecosystems. In: BSC Leadbeater, JC Green (eds) The Flagellates. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 240–268

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arndt H, Mathes J (1991) Large heterotrophic flagellates form a significant part of protozooplankton biomass in lakes and rivers. Ophelia 33:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arndt H, Schmidt-Denter K, Auer B, Weitere M (in press) Biofilms and protozoans. In: WE Krumbein, DM Paterson, GA Zavarzin (eds) Fossil and Recent Biofilms, Mats and Networks. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

  5. ARW (ed) (1998) Jahresbericht 1997 der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rhein-Wasserwerke (ARW). Report, ARW, Cologne

    Google Scholar 

  6. Basu BK, Pick FR (1997) Factors related to heterotrophic bacterial and flagellate abundance in temperate rivers. Aquat Microb Ecol 12:123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berninger U-G, Finlay BJ, Kuuppo-Leinikki P (1991) Protozoan control of bacterial abundance in freshwater. Limnol Oceanogr 36:139–147

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berninger U-G, Caron DA, Sanders RW, Finlay, BJ (1991) Heterotrophic flagellates of planktonic communities, their characteristics and methods of study. In: DJ Patterson, J Larsen (eds) The Biology of Free-Living Heterotrophic Flagellates. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 39–56

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boenigk J, Arndt H (2000) Particle handling during interception feeding by four species of heterotrophic nanoflagellates. J Eukaryot Microbiol 48:350–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Børsheim K, Bratbak G (1987) Cell volume to cell carbon conversion factors for a bacterivorous Monas sp. enriched from seawater. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 36:171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bott TL, Kaplan LA (1990) Potential of protozoan grazing of bacteria in streambed sediments. J N Am Benthol Soc 9:336–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carlough LA, Meyer JL (1990) Rates of protozoan bacterivory in three habitats of a southeastern blackwater river. J N Am Benthol Soc 9:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carlough LA, Meyer JL (1991) Bacterivory by sestonic protists in a southeastern blackwater river. Limnol Oceanogr 36:873–883

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Ruyter van Steveninck ED, Admiraal W, Breebaart L, Tubbing GMJ, van Zanten B (1992) Plankton in the River Rhine: structural and functional changes observed during downstream transport. J Plankton Res 14:1351–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Findlay SE, Pace ML, Fischer DT (1998) Response of heterotrophic planktonic bacteria to the zebra mussel invasion of the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Microb Ecol 36:131–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gasol JM, Comerma M, García JC, Armengol J, Casamayor EO, Kojeckâ P, Šimek K (2002) A transplant experiment to identify the factors controlling bacterial abundance, activity, production, and community composition in a eutrophic canyon-shaped reservoir. Limnol Oceanogr 47:62–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gasol JM, Vaqué D (1993) Lack of coupling between heterotrophic nanoflagellates and bacteria: a general phenomenon across aquatic systems? Limnol Oceanogr 38:657–665

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen PJ, Björnsen PK, Hansen BW (1997) Zooplankton grazing and growth: Scaling within the 2-2,000 µm body size range. Limnol Oceanogr 42:687–704

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoch M, Kirchman D (1993) Seasonal and inter-annual variability in bacterial production and biomass in a temperate estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 98:283–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iriberri J, Ayo B, Unanue M, Barcina I, Egea L (1993) Channeling of bacterioplanktonic production towards phagotrophic flagellates and ciliates under different seasonal conditions in a river. Microb Ecol 26:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jürgens K, Güde H (1994) The potential importance of grazing-resistant bacteria in planktonic systems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 112:169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jürgens K, Pernthaler J, Schalla S, Amann R (1999) Morphological and compositional changes in a planktonic bacterial community in response to enhanced protozoan grazing. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1241–1250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lair N, Jacquet V, Reyes-Marchant P (1999) Factors related to autotrophic potamoplankton, heterotrophic protists and micrometazoan abundance, at two sites in a lowland temperate river during low water flow. Hydrobiologia 394:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leff LG, Leff AA, Lemke MJ (1998) Seasonal changes in planktonic bacterial assemblages of two Ohio streams. Freshwat Biol 39:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips EC (1995) Comparison of the Zooplankton of a lake and stream in Northwest Arkansas. J Freshwat Ecol 10:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  26. Porter KG, Feig YS (1980) The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol Oceanogr 25:943–948

    Google Scholar 

  27. Primc-Habdija B, Habdija I, Meštrov M, Radanović I (1996) Composition of ciliate fauna and its seasonal changes in fluvial drift. Aquat Sci 58:224–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajagopal S, van der Velde G, Paffen BGP, bij de Vaate A (1998) Ecology and impact of the exotic amphipod, Corophium curvispinum Sars, 1895 (Crustacea: Amphipoda), in the River Rhine and Meuse. Reports of the project Ecology and Rehabilitation of Rivers Rhine and Meuse 75, Lelystad

  29. Rajagopal S, Paffen BGP, van der Velde G (1995) Particle removal from the water column by epilithic dominant filter feeders in the River Rhine and Meuse (The Netherlands). Report RIZA/ University of Nijmegen

  30. Sanders RW (1991) Trophic strategies among heterotrophic flagellates. In: DJ Patterson, J Larsen (eds) The Biology of Free-Living Heterotrophic Flagellates. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sanders RW, Porter KG, Bennett SJ, DeBiase AE (1989) Seasonal patterns of bacterivory by flagellates, ciliates, rotifers, and cladocerans in a freshwater planktonic community. Limnol Oceanogr 34:673–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Servais P, Grosselain V, Joaquim-Justo C, Becquevort S, Thome J, Descy J-P (2000) Trophic relationships between planktonic microorganisms in the river Meuse (Belgium): a carbon budget. Arch Hydrobiol 149:625–653

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Simon M, Azam F (1989) Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 51:201–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Simon M, Bunte C, Schulz M, Weiss M, Wünsch C (1998) Bacterioplankton dynamics in Lake Constance (Bodensee): Substrate utilization, growth control, and long-term trends. Arch Hydrobiol Spec Issues Advanc Limnol 53:195–221

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sleigh M (2000) Trophic strategies. In: BSC Leadbeater, JC Green (eds) The Flagellates. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 147–165

    Google Scholar 

  36. Snyder RA, Hoch MP (1996) Consequences of protist-stimulated bacterial production for estimating protist growth efficiencies. Hydrobiologia 341:113–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Spreafico M, van Mazijk A (1993) Das Alarmmodell Rhein — ein Modell für die operationeile Vorhersage des Transportes von Schadstoffen im Rhein. CHR-report 1/12

  38. Sprung M, Rose U (1988) Influence of food size and food quality on the feeding of the mussel Dreissena polymorphs. Oecologia 77:526–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Steward GF, Smith DC, Azam F (1996) Abundance and production of bacteria and viruses in the Bering and Chukchi Seas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 131:287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Straile D (1997) Gross growth efficiencies of protozoan and metazoan Zooplankton and their dependence on food concentration, predator-prey weight ratio, and taxonomic group. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1375–1385

    Google Scholar 

  41. Strom SL, Benner R, Ziegler S, Dagg MJ (1997): Planktonic grazers are a potentially important source of marine dissolved organic carbon. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1364–1374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Vaqué D, Pace ML, Findlay S, Lints D (1992) Fate of bacterial production in a heterotrophic ecosystem: grazing by protists and metazoans in the Hudson Estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 89:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vörös L, Balogh K, Herodek S, Kiss K (2000) Underwater light conditions, phytoplankton photosynthesis and bacterioplankton production in the Hungarian section of the River Danube. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 115:511–532

    Google Scholar 

  44. Way CM, Hornbach DJ, Miller-Way CA, Payne BS, Miller AC (1990) Dynamics of filter feeding in Corbicula fluminea (Bivalvia: Corbiculidae). Can J Zool 68:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Weisse T (1991) The microbial food web and its sensitivity to eutrophication and contaminant enrichment: a cross-system overview. Int Revue ges Hydrobiol 76:327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Weitere M, Arndt H (2002) Top-down effects on pelagic heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) in a large river (River Rhine): Do losses to the benthos play a role? Freshwat Biol (in press)

  47. Welker M, Walz N (1998) Can mussels control the plankton in rivers? — a planktological approach applying a Lagrangian sampling strategy. Limnol Oceanogr 43:753–762

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wieltschnig C, Kirschner AKT, Steitz A, Velimirov B (2001) Weak coupling between heterotrophic nanoflagellates and bacteria in a eutrophic freshwater environment. Microb Ecol 42:159–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zubkov MV, Sleigh MA, Burkill PH (2001) Heterotrophic bacterial turnover along the 20°W meridian between 59°N and 37°N in July 1996. Deep Sea Res II 48:987–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zubkov MV, Sleigh MA, Burkill PH, Leakey RJG (2000) Bacterial growth and grazing loss in contrasting areas of North and South Atlantic. J Plankton Res 22:685–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. M. Weitere

    Present address: Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, Institute of Biology/Zoology, Free University of Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3, D-14195, Berlin, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Ecology and Limnology, University of Cologne, Zoological Institute, Weyertal 119, D-50923, Cologne, Germany

    M. Weitere & H. Arndt

Authors
  1. M. Weitere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Arndt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Weitere.

Additional information

Online publication: 20 May 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weitere, M., Arndt, H. Water discharge-regulated bacteria-heterotrophic nanoflagellate (HNF) interactions in the water column of the river rhine. Microb Ecol 44, 19–29 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-002-2010-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-002-2010-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation