Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Three-dimensional Microorganization of the Soil–Root–Microbe System

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soils contain the greatest reservoir of biodiversity on Earth, and the functionality of the soil ecosystem sustains the rest of the terrestrial biosphere. This functionality results from complex interactions between biological and physical processes that are strongly modulated by the soil physical structure. Using a novel combination of biochemical and biophysical indicators and synchrotron microtomography, we have discovered that soil microbes and plant roots microengineer their habitats by changing the porosity and clustering properties (i.e., spatial correlation) of the soil pores. Our results indicate that biota act to significantly alter their habitat toward a more porous, ordered, and aggregated structure that has important consequences for functional properties, including transport processes. These observations support the hypothesis that the soil–plant–microbe complex is self-organized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Crawford, JW, Harris, JA, Ritz, K, Young, IM (2005) Towards an evolutionary ecology of life in soil. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 81–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Papke, RT, Ward, DM (2004) The importance of physical isolation to microbial diversification. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 48: 293–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fenchel, T (2003) Biogeography for bacteria. Science 301: 925–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tisdall, JM, Oades, JM (1982) Organic matter and water stable aggregates in soil. Soil Sci 23: 821–825

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaiser, K (2004) Wounding earth's fragile skin. Science 304: 1616–1618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Denef, K, Six, J, Merckx, R, Paustian, K (2004) Carbon sequestration in microaggregates of no-tillage soils with different clay mineralogy. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68: 1935–1944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Six, J, Ogle, SM, Breidt, FJ, Conant, RT, Mosier, AR, Paustian, K (2004) The potential to mitigate global warming with no-tillage is only realized when practiced in the long-term. Glob Chang Biol 10: 155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boussuyt, H, Six, Hendrix, PF (2002) Aggregate protected carbon in no-tillage and conventional tillage agroecosystems using 14C labeled plant residue. Soil Sci Soc J 66: 1965–1973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Foster, RC (1998) Microenvironments of soil organisms. Biol Fertil Soils 6: 89–203

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruand, A, Cousin, I, Nicoullaud, B, Duval, O, Begon, JC (1996) Backscattered electron scanning images of soil porosity for analysing soil compaction around roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60: 895–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Watt, M, McCully, ME, Canny, MJ (1994) Formation and stabilisation of rhizosheaths of Zea mays L. Effect of soil water content. Plant Physiol 106: 179–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martens, DA, Frankenberger, WT (1992) Decomposition of bacteria polymers in soil and their influence on soil structure. Biol Fertil Soils 13: 65–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ritz, K, Young, IM (2004) Interactions between soil structure and fungi. Mycologist 18: 52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallett, PD, Nunan, NN, Douglas, JT, Young, IM (2004) Millimeter-scale spatial variability in soil water sorptivity: scale, surface elevation and subcritical effects. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68: 352–358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Read, DB, Bengough, AG, Gregory, PJ, Crawford, JW, Robinson, D, Scrimgeour, CM, Young, IM, Zhang, G, Zhang, Z (2003) Plant roots release phospholipids surfactants that modify the physical and chemical properties of soil. New Phytol 157: 315–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Crawford, JW, Verrall, S, Young, IM (1997) The origin and loss of fractal scaling in simulated soil aggregates. Eur J Soil Sci 48: 643–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Favis-Mortlock, DA (1998) Self-organising dynamic systems approach to the simulation of rill initiation and development on hillslopes. Comput Geosci 24: 353–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stahl, PD, Parkin, B (1996) Relationship of soil ergosterol concentration and fungal biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 28: 847–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruzicka, S, Norman, MDO, Harris, JA (1995) Rapid ultrasonic method to determine ergosterol concentration in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 27: 1215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. White, NA, Hallett, PD, Feeney, D, Palfreyman, JW, Ritz, K (2000) Changes to water repellence of soil caused by the growth of white-rot fungi: studies using a novel microcosm system. FEMS Microbiol Lett 184: 73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nunan, N, Ritz, K, Rivers, M, Feeney, DS, Young, IM (2006) Investigating microbial micro-habitat structure using X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma (in press)

  22. Wright, SF, Upadhyaya, A (1996) A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin a glycoprotein of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 198: 97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Otten, W, Harris, K, Young, IM, Ritz, K, Gilligan, CA (2004) Preferential spread of the pathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani through structured soil. New Phytol 151: 203–210

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harris, K, Young, IM, Gilligan, CA, Otten, W, Ritz, K (2003) Effect of bulk density on the spatial organisation of the fungus Rhizoctonia solani in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44: 45–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murray, AB, Paola, C (2004) A cellular model of braided rivers. Nature 371: 54–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Levin, SA (1998) Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1: 431

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Portions of this work were performed at GeoSoilEnviroCARS (Sector 13), APS, Argonne National Laboratory. GeoSoilEnviroCARS is supported by the National Science Foundation–Earth Sciences (EAR-0217473), Department of Energy-Geosciences (DE-FG02-94ER14466), and the State of Illinois. Use of APS was supported by the US Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, under contract no. W-31-109-Eng-38. We acknowledge funding from the Biotechnological Biological Research Council (BBSRC; grant number D20454), the Natural Environment Research Council, and the University of Abertay. KR gratefully acknowledges the support in the form of an International Scientific Interchange Scheme (ISIS) grant from the BBSRC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iain M. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feeney, D.S., Crawford, J.W., Daniell, T. et al. Three-dimensional Microorganization of the Soil–Root–Microbe System. Microb Ecol 52, 151–158 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9062-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9062-8

Keywords

Navigation