Abstract
Purpose
Knee pain after total knee arthroplasty may be caused by an unresurfaced patella. Secondary isolated resurfacing of the previously unresurfaced patella in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcome after patellar resurfacing as a second stage procedure.
Methods
The study included 22 patients (13 female/nine male) who underwent resurfacing of the patella with a mean follow-up of 61.8 ± 39.2 months. The mean age of the patients was 60 ± 9.7 years at the time of operation. The average period between total knee arthroplasty and patellar resurfacing was 26.3 ± 15.2 months. The patient’s subjective satisfaction was assessed by a custom-made questionnaire.
Results
The mean Knee Society Score improved significantly from 60.1 ± 8.3 to 77.0 ± 6.3 (p = 0.0063). The mean functional score also improved significantly from 42.7 ± 2.3 to 60.2 ± 3.9 (p = 0.001). Three patients (13.6%) needed further operative revision.
Conclusions
Although clinical scores showed significant improvement some patients continued to have pain and remained dissatisfied without detecting a specific reason. Further studies are needed to better elucidate the benefit of patellar resurfacing as second stage procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L (2001) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(9):1376–1381
Barrack RL, Matzkin E, Ingraham R, Engh G, Rorabeck C (1998) Revision knee arthroplasty with patella replacement versus bony shell. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:139–143
Boyd AD Jr, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB (1993) Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:674–681
Burke WV, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA (2005) Isolated revision of failed metal-backed patellar components: outcome with minimum 4-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 20:998–1001
Calvisi V, Camillieri G, Lupparelli S (2009) Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal of the available evidence. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1261–1270
Cercek R, Jacofsky D, Kieffer K, Larsen B, Jacofsky M (2011) Lateral patellofemoral impingement: a cause of treatable pain after TKA. J Knee Surg 24:181–184
Forster MC (2004) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee 11:427–430
Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Elias SG, Mariorenzi LJ, Gokcay EI, Tuke M (1989) The patellofemoral joint in total knee prostheses. Design considerations. J Arthroplasty 4(Suppl):S69–S74
Garcia RM, Kraay MJ, Goldberg VM (2010) Isolated resurfacing of the previously unresurfaced patella total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25:754–758
Helmy N, Anglin C, Greidanus NV, Masri BA (2008) To resurface or not to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2775–2783
Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14
Kainz H, Reng W, Augat P, Wurm S (2011) Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and contact characteristics. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1270-2
Karnezis IA, Vossinakis IC, Rex C, Fragkiadakis EG, Newman JH (2003) Secondary patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of multivariate analysis in two case-matched groups. J Arthroplasty 18:993–998
Keblish PA, Varma AK, Greenwald AS (1994) Patellar resurfacing or retention in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of patients with bilateral replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:930–937
Kozak LJ, Owings MF, Hall MJ (2004) National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2001 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. Vital Health Stat 13 156:1–198
Leopold SS, Silverton CD, Barden RM, Rosenberg AG (2003) Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(1):41–47
Mockford BJ, Beverland DE (2005) Secondary resurfacing of the patella in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:898–902
Muoneke HE, Khan AM, Giannikas KA, Hägglund E, Dunningham TH (2003) Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:675–678
Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Bizot P, Hannouche D, Sedel L (2005) A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:196–203
Ogon M, Hartig F, Bach C, Nogler M, Steingruber I, Biedermann R (2002) Patella resurfacing: no benefit for the long-term outcome of total knee arthroplasty. A 10- to 16.3-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:229–234
Ostermeier S, Buhrmester O, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C (2005) Dynamic in vitro measurement of patellar movement after total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:30
Parvizi J, Mortazavi SM, Devulapalli C, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH (2012) Secondary resurfacing of the patella after primary total knee arthroplasty: does the anterior knee pain resolve? J Arthroplasty 27:21–26. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.027
Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Saleh KJ, Kuskowski MA, Sharkey PF, Mont MA (2005) Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 438:191–196
Ranawat CS (1986) The patellofemoral joint in total condylar knee arthroplasty. Pros and cons based on five- to ten-year follow-up observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:93–99
Spencer SJ, Young D, Blyth MJ (2010) Secondary resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 17:187–190
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Daniilidis, K., Vogt, B., Gosheger, G. et al. Patellar resurfacing as a second stage procedure for persistent anterior knee pain after primary total knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 36, 1181–1183 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1463-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1463-8