Skip to main content
Log in

53BP1 and MDC1 foci formation in HT-1080 cells for low- and high-LET microbeam irradiations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An improved assessment of the biological effects and related risks of low doses of ionizing radiation is currently an important issue in radiation biology. Irradiations using microbeams are particularly well suited for precise and localized dose depositions, whereas recombinant cell lines with fluorescent proteins allow the live observation of radiation-induced foci. Living cells of the fibrosarcoma cell line HT-1080 stably expressing 53BP1 or full-length reconstituted MDC1 fused to Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) were irradiated with protons and α-particles of linear energy transfers (LETs) of 15 and 75 keV/μm, respectively. Using a microbeam, the irradiations were carried out in line patterns, which facilitated the discrimination between undefined background and radiation-induced foci. As expected, foci formation and respective kinetics from α-particle irradiations with a high LET of 75 keV/μm could be detected in a reliable manner by both fusion proteins, as reported previously. Colocalization of γ-H2AX foci confirmed the DSB nature of the detected foci. As a novel result, the application of protons with low LET of 15 keV/μm generated 53BP1- and MDC1-mediated foci of almost equal size and slightly different kinetics. This new data expands the capability of 53BP1 and wild-type MDC1 on visible foci formation in living cells after irradiation with low-LET particles. Furthermore, the kinetics in HT-1080 cells for α-particle irradiation show a delay of about 20 s for 53BP1 foci detection compared to wild-type MDC1, confirming the hierarchical assembly of both proteins. Preliminary data for proton irradiations are shown and also these indicate a delay for 53BP1 versus MDC1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asaithamby A, Chen DJ (2009) Cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks after low-dose γ-irradiation. Nucleic Acids Res 37:3912–3923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asaithamby A, Uematsu N, Chatterjee A, Story MD, Burma S, Chen DJ (2008) Repair of HZE-particle induced DNA double strand breaks in normal human fibroblasts. Radiat Res 169:437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audebert M, Salles B, Calsou P (2004) Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA Ligase III in an alternative route for DNA Double strand breaks rejoining. J Biol Chem 279:55117–55126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner WM, Redon CE, Dickey JS, Nakamura AJ, Sedelnikova OA, Solier S, Pommier Y (2008) γH2AX and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 8:957–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chronis F, Rogakou EP (2007) Interplay between γH2AX and 53BP1 pathways in DNA double strand break repair response. In: Gewirtz DA, Holt SE, Grant S (eds) Apoptosis, senescence, and cancer. 2nd edn. Humana Press, Totowa. pp 243–263

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks W, Wirth M, Hauser H (1993) Dicistronic transcription units for gene expression in mammalian cells. Gene 128:247–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du G (2010) Focipicker3D, ImageJ plugin, http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/plugins/foci-picker3d/index.html

  • Elliott B, Jasin M (2001) Repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination in mismatch repair-defective mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 21:2671–2682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, DA, Holt, SE, Grant, S (eds) (2007) Apoptosis, senescence, and cancer. 2nd edn. Humana Press, Totowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif KD, Brede HJ, Frankenberg D, Giesen U (2004) The PTB single ion microbeam for irradiation of living cells. Nucl Instrum Meth B 217:505–512

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Greif KD, Beverung W, Langner F, Frankenberg D, Gellhaus A, Banaz-Yasar F (2006) The PTB microbeam: a versatile intrument for radiobiological research. Radiat Prot Dosim 122:313–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hable V (2010) Private communication

  • Hong Z, Jiang J, Hashiguchi K, Hoshi M, Lan L, Yasui A (2008) Recruitment of mismatch repair proteins to the site of DNA damage in human cells. J Cell Sci 121:3146–3154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob B, Rudolph JH, Gueven N, Lavin MF, Taucher-Scholz G (2005) Live cell imaging of heavy-ion-induced radiation responses by beamline microscopy. Radiat Res 163:681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James F, Moneta L, Winkler M, Zsenei A (2008) Last MINUIT release. http://lcgapp.cern.ch/project/cls/work-packages/mathlibs/minuit/home.html

  • Khanna KK, Jackson SP (2001) DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat Genet 27:247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukas C, Melander F, Stucki M, Jacob F, Bekker-Jensen S, Goldberg M, Lerenthal Y, jackson SP, Bartek J, Lukas J (2004) Mdc1 couples DNA double-strand break recognition by Nbs1 with its H2AX-dependent chromatin retention. EMBO J 23:2674–2683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusizik-Bhadra M, d’Errico F, Lusini L, Wiegel B (1996) Microdosimetric investigations in a proton therapy beam with sequentially etched CR-39 track detectors. Radiat Prot Dosim 66:353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke C, Tümmlerer M, Schübeler D, von Hoegen I, Hause H (2000) Stabilized, long-term expression of heterodimeric proteins from tricistronic mRNA. Gene 254:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paull TT, Gellert M (1998) The 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity of MRE11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cel 1:969–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai R, Dai H, Multani AS, Li K, Chin K, Gray J, Lahad JP, Liang J, Mills GB, Bernstam FM, Lin S-Y (2006) BRIT1 regulates early DNA damage response, chromosomal integrity, and cancer. Cancer Cell 10:145–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogakou EP, Pilch DR, Orr AH, Ivanova VS, Bonner WM (1998) DNA Double-stranded breaks induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139. J Biol Chem 273:5858–5868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz LB, Chehab NH, Malikzay A, Halazonetis TD (2000) P53 binding protein 1 (53bp1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Biol 151:1381–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simsek D, Furda A, Gao Y, Artus J, Brunet E, Hadjantonakis AK, Van Houten B, Shuman S, McKinnon PJ, Jasin M (2011) Crucial role for DNA ligase III in mitochondria but not in Xrcc1-dependent repair. Nature 471(7337):245–248

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ugenskiene R, Prise K, Folkard M, Lekki J, Stachura Z, Zazula M, Stachura J (2009) Dose response and kinetics of foci disappearance following exposure to high- and low-LET ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 85:872–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Wu W, Wu W, Rosidi B, Zhang L, Wang H, Iliakis G (2006) PARP1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 34:6170–6182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank O. Döhr, H. Eggestein, T. Heldt, and M. Hoffmann for the operation of the PTB ion accelerators, K. Beverung, A. Heiske and S. Löb for their constant support with the irradiation of cells and S. Fähnrich and Y. Merkhoffer for cell culture and preparation of cells.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Marita Mosconi or Ulrich Giesen.

Additional information

This paper is based on a presentation made at the 9th International Microbeam Workshop, July 15–17, 2010, in Darmstadt, Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mosconi, M., Giesen, U., Langner, F. et al. 53BP1 and MDC1 foci formation in HT-1080 cells for low- and high-LET microbeam irradiations. Radiat Environ Biophys 50, 345–352 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-011-0366-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-011-0366-9

Keywords

Navigation