Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of Some Insecticides on Wheat Blossom Midges in Winter Wheat

Zur Bekämpfung von Weizengallmücken in Winterweizen in Mitteldeutschland

  • Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Gesunde Pflanzen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Orange wheat blossom midge damage can impart serious loss of quantity and quality of winter wheat. Wheat midges were evaluated in large scale field in winter wheat in Bad Lausick (Leipzig, Saxsony) central Germany. The present study aimed at studying the activity of wheat blossom midges WBM, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) and Contarinia tritici (Kirby) using pheromone, sticky traps and two types of water traps. Management of midges with different treatments was studied; Karate (pyrethroid), Biscaya (neonicotinoid) and NeemAzal T/S (botanical insecticide) were sprayed on wheat at heading stage (GS 55). Monitoring was conducted before the treatment and continued for 4 weeks after the treatment. Pheromone traps were used for forecasting midge adult population and determine the control date. Water traps were used to assess midge larvae, while midge adults were surveyed using sticky traps.

A strong correlation between midge catches and weather conditions was obtained; as well a coincidence between pheromone catches and wheat midge infestation in the susceptible growth stages (GS 47–65) was recorded. Insecticide applications to fields of midge-infested winter wheat significantly reduced the wheat midge damage. There were significant differences in wheat midge numbers between treated and untreated; wheat midge numbers were lower in the treated than in control. The results proved that both Karate and Biscaya caused more mortality to wheat midges than NeemAzal T/S.

Zusammenfassung

Weizengallmücken sind ökonomisch bedeutsame Schädlinge im Winterweizen und können in Abhängigkeit vom Befallsbeginn in der Weizenähre verschiedene Schadsymptome (z. B. Kümmerkörner) verursachen. Zur Etablierung einer Bekämpfungsstrategie wurde im Jahre 2012 in der Leipziger Tieflandsbucht ein Insektizidversuch auf einem Praxisschlag durchgeführt. Die Zielstellung des sogenannten „On–Farm-Experiment“ war es, eine Bewertung direkt im Produktionsfeld vorzunehmen und Hinweise zur Entscheidungsunterstützung der Landwirte zu formulieren. Der methodische Ansatz berücksichtigte den Einsatz von Pheromonfallen, Gelbtafeln und Wasserschalen zur Überwachung der Flugaktivität der Mücken und zur Erfassung des Abwanderungsverhaltens der Larven. Die Bekämpfungsstrategie orientierte sich am derzeitigen Wissensstand und terminierte einen Spritztermin zum Ährenschieben. Es wurden zugelassene Insektizide hinsichtlich ihrer Effektivität gegenüber Weizengallmücken in einem Zeitfenster von fünf Wochen getestet. Die Ergebnisse 2012 zeigen eine gute Korrelation zwischen Mückenaktivität und den Wetterbedingungen. Die Pheromonfallenfänge signalisieren unter den Feldbedingungen eine enge Koinzidenz zwischen dem Flughöhepunkt und dem kritischen Pflanzenstadium (BBCH 55–65). Der Bekämpfungstermin war somit optimal auf die Schädlingsaktivität abgestimmt. Die Feldstudie belegt signifikante Unterschiede zwischen den Varianten. Die höchsten Wirkungsgrade erzielte der Einsatz von Karate Zeon, gefolgt von Biscaya und NeemAzal T/S. Die Datenanalyse des Experiments zeigt ein hohes Schadpotential von Weizengallmücken auf dem Kontrollschlag und unterstreicht die Notwendigkeit diese versteckt lebenden Ährenschädlinge exakt zu überwachen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott WS/ (1925) A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265–276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (2011) Beschreibende Sortenliste Getreide, Mais, Ölfrüchte, Leguminosen (großkörnig), Hackfrüchte (außer Kartoffeln). Bundessortenamt, Osterfelddamm 80, 30627 Hanover ISSN 0948–4167, pp 86–120

  • Anonymous (2012) List of authorized plant protection products in Germany with information on terminated authorizations. Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit. www.bvl.bund.de/infoppp

  • Barker AM, Sanbrooke KJ, Aebischer NJ (1997) The water trap colour preferences of farmland sawflies. Entomol Exp Appl 85:83–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basedow T, Gillich H (1982) Untersuchungen zur Prognose des Auftretens von Contarinia tritici und Sitodiplosis mosellana. II. Faktoren, die ein Schadauftreten der Mücken verhindern können. Anz Schädlkunde Pflschutz 55:84–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce TJA, Hooper AM et al (2007) Development of a pheromone trap monitoring system for Sitodiplosis mosellana, in the UK. Pest Manag Sci 63:49–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter JE, Preston KR, Cooke LA, Morgan BC, Kruger JE, Kilborn RH, Elliott RH (1987) The influence of orange wheat blossom midge Sitodiplosis mosellana damage on hard red spring wheat and the effectiveness of insecticide treatments. Can J Plant Sci 67:697–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott RH (1988) Evaluation of insecticides for protection of wheat against damage by the wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana(Géhin). Can Entomol 120:615–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott RH, Mann LW (1996) Susceptibility of red spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. cv. Katepwa, during heading and anthesis to damage by wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Can Entomol 128:367–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott RH, Mann LW (1997) Control of wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana at lower chemical rates with small-capacity sprayer nozzles. Crop Prot 16:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis SA, Bruce TJA, Smart LE, Martin JL, Snape J, Self M (2009) Integrated management strategies for varieties tolerant and susceptible to wheat midge. HGCA Project Report number 451 May 2009, p. 148

  • El-Wakeil NE, Gaafar N, Volkmar C (2010) Susceptibility of spring wheat to infestation with wheat midges and thrips. J Plant Dis Prot 117:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaafar N (2010) Wheat midges and thrips information system: monitoring and decision making in central Germany. PhD Diss Martin- Luther- Uni Halle, p. 109

  • Gaafar N, Volkmar C (2009) Monitoring system of orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellanausing pheromone trap in the central Germany. Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Ent 17:221–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaafar N, Volkmar C (2010) Evaluation of wheat ear insects in large scale field in central Germany. Agric Sci 1:68–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaafar N, El-Wakeil NE, Volkmar C (2011) Assessment of wheat ear insects in winter wheat varieties in central Germany. J Pest Sci 84:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gries R, Gries G, Khaskin G, King S, Olfert O, et al (2000) Sex pheromone of orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana. Naturwissenschaften 87:450–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • JianCheng L, Gang W, Jun D, QingWen Z (2000) Study on the techniques for control of wheat midge by chemicals. Plant Prot 26:30–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurppa SLA (1989) Wheat blossom midges, Sitodiplosis mosellana Géhin and Contarinia tritici (Kirby) in Finland during 1981–1987. Ann Agric Fenniae 28:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb RJ, Tucker JR, Wise IL, Smith MAH (2000) Trophic interaction between Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera) and spring wheat: implications for yield and seed quality. Can Entomol 132:607–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb RJ,Wise IL,Gavloski JE,Kaminski LA,Olfert OO (2002) Making control decisions for Sitodiplosis mosellana in wheat using sticky traps. Can Entomol 134:851–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb RJ, Sridhar P, Smith MAH, Wise IL (2003) Oviposition preference and offspring performance of a wheat midge Sitodiplosis mosellana on defended and less well defended wheat plants. Environ Entomol 32:414–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley JN (1994) Orange wheat blossom midge: a literature review and survey of the 1993 outbreak. Res Rev No. 28. Home-Grown Cereals Authority London, p. 51

  • Oakley JN (2008) Control needs for changing pest distribution. Arable cropping in a changing climate: Proc HGCA, Conf United Kingdom: HGCA. pp. 87–92

  • Oakley JN, Cumbleton PC, Corbett SJ, Saunders P, et al (1998) Prediction of orange wheat blossom midge activity and risk of damage. Crop Prot 17:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley JN, Talbot G, et al (2005) Integrated control of wheat midge: variety choice, use of pheromone traps & treatment thresholds. HGCA Project Report (363) 65

  • Olfert OO, Elliott RH, Hartley S, Zeleny K (2004) Forecast of wheat midge in Alberta and Saskatchewan for 2004, 2003 Crop variety highlights and insect pest forecasts. Saskatoon Res Centre Technical Bull No. 2004-01:14–15

  • Olfert OO, Elliott RH, Hartley S (2009) Non-native insects in agriculture: strategies to manage the economic and environmental impact of wheat midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana, in Saskatchewan. Biol Invasions 11:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pivnick KA (1993) Response of males to female sex pheromone in the orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana. J Chem Ecol 19:1677–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pivnick KA, Labbe E (1993) Daily patterns of activity of females of the orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana. Can Entomol 125:725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanower TG (2005) Occurrence of Sitodiplosis mosellanaand its parasitoid, Macroglenes penetrans in northeastern Montana. Can Entomol 137:753–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Lamb R (2001) Factors influencing oviposition by Sitodiplosis mosellana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on wheat spikes. Can Entomol 133:533–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CR, Maurice SC (2008) Statistix 9, Ninth Edition, Managerial Economics McGraw-Hill/Irwin. (ISBN: 0073402818). More information at http://www.statistix.com. Accessed 28 Sept 2012

  • Tottman DR (1987) The decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, with illustrations. Ann Appl Biol 110:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varshney RK, Balyan HS, Langridge P (2006) Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants. Cereals and Millets 1:79–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmar C, Werner C, Matthes P (2008) On the occurrence and crop damage of wheat blossom midges Contarinia tritici(Kby.) and Sitodiplosis mosellana (Geh.) in Saxony-Anhalt. Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Ent 16:305–308

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our deep thanks are due to Trifoloio for providing us NeemAzal T/S. We are also greatly indebted to Prof. M. Saleh for his helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported financially by DFG in Martin Luther University in Halle, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil E. El-Wakeil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Wakeil, N., Abdel-Moniem, A., Gaafar, N. et al. Effectiveness of Some Insecticides on Wheat Blossom Midges in Winter Wheat. Gesunde Pflanzen 65, 7–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-012-0289-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-012-0289-7

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation