Abstract
Biodiversity hotspots are used widely to designate priority regions for conservation efforts. It is unknown, however, whether the current network of hotspots adequately represents globally threatened taxonomic diversity for whole plant and animal groups. We used a mammalian group traditionally neglected in terms of conservation efforts, the rodents, in order to test whether biodiversity hotspots match the current distribution of threatened taxa (genera and species). Significantly higher numbers of threatened rodent genera and species fell within biodiversity hotspots; nonetheless over 25% of the total threatened genera and species did not occur in any biodiversity hotspot. This was particularly true for the Australian region, where 100% of the threatened genera and species fell outside biodiversity hotspots, with many threatened taxa found in Papua-New Guinea. We suggest to officially including Papua New Guinea among biodiversity hotspots for rodents, and also the steppic/semidesert areas of central Asia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amori G, Gippoliti S (2000) What do mammalogists want to save? Ten years of mammalian conservation biology. Biodiv Conserv 9:785–793
Amori G, Gippoliti S (2001) Identifying priority ecoregions for rodent conservation at the genus level. Oryx 35:158–165
Amori G, Gippoliti S (2003) A higher-taxon approach to rodent conservation priorities for the 21st century. Anim Biodiv Conserv 26(2):1–18
Amori G, Gippoliti S, Helgen KM (2008) Diversity, distribution, and conservation of endemic island rodents. Quat Int 182:6–15
Bode M, Wilson KA, Brooks TA, Turner WA, Mittermeier RA, McBride MF, Underwood EC, Possingham HP (2008) Cost-effective global conservation spending is robust to taxonomic group. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:6498–6501
Bottrill MC, Joseph LN, Carwardine J, Bode M, Cook C, Game ET, Grantham E, Kark S, Linke S, McDonald-Madden E, Pressey RL, Walker S, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (2008) Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol Evol 23:649–654
Carwardine J, Wilson KA, Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Naidoo R, Iwamura T, Hajkowicz SA, Possingham HP (2008) Cost-effective priorities for global mammal conservation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:11446–11450
Hoffmann M et al (2010) The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330:1503–1509
IUCN (2010) IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2010.3. http://www.iucnredlist.org
Myers N (1998) Global biodiversity priorities and expanded conservation policies. In: Mace GM, Balmford A, Ginsberg JR (eds) Conservation in a changing world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 273–285
Myers N, Mittermaier RA, Mittermaier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858
Schipper J et al (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322:225–230
Stuart W, Vivero Po JL, Spawls S, Shimelis A, Kelbessa E (2004) Ethiopian highlands. In: Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, da Fonseca GAB (eds) Hotspots revisited. CEMEX, Mexico, pp 262–273
Wilson DE, Reeder DR (2005) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edn. John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Amori, G., Gippoliti, S. & Luiselli, L. Do biodiversity hotspots match with rodent conservation hotspots?. Biodivers Conserv 20, 3693–3700 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0131-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0131-z