Abstract
The governance of nanotechnology seeks to limit its risks, without constraining opportunities. The literature on the effectiveness of approaches to governance has neglected approaches that impact directly on the behavior of a researcher. We analyze the effectiveness of legal regulations versus regulation via self-commitment. Then, we refine this model by analyzing competition and autonomy as key contingency factors. In the first step, qualitative interviews with nanotechnology researchers are conducted to reflect this model. In the second step, its empirical relevance is tested using a survey of 90 nanotech researchers. The results indicate that legal regulations, as well as self-commitment to an informal CoC reduce the scope of behavior. Finally, that competition and autonomy affect the relative strength of these governance factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, P. (2001). Market hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215–234.
Bailey, M. A., & Lattimore, R. G. (2004). Nanotechnology: Now is the time to assess risks. Occupational Hazards, 66(9), 68–70.
Berger, F., Gevers, S., Siep, L., & Welting, K.-M. (2008). Ethical legal and social aspects of brain-implants using nano-scale materials and techniques. Nanoethics, 2, 241–249.
Bergeson, L. L., & Auerbach, B. (2004). Reading the small print (about nanotechnology). The Environmental Forum, 21(2), 30–40.
Bormann, E. G. (1975). Discussion and group methods: Theory and practice. New York: Harper & Row.
Bowman, D. M., & Hodge, G. A. (2006). Nanotechnology: Mapping the wild regulatory frontier. Futures, 38, 1060–1073.
Bowman, D. M., & Hodge, G. A. (2007). Editorial—governing nanotechnology: More than a small matter? Nanoethics, 1, 239–241.
Bowman, D. M., & Hodge, G. A. (2008). A big regulatory tool-box for a small technology. Nanoethics, 2, 193–207.
Boyd, C. (1996). Ethics and corporate governance: The issues raised by the Cadbury report in the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(2), 167–182.
Breggin, L. K., & Carothers, L. (2006). Governing uncertainty: The nanotechnology environmental health, and safety challenge. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 31, 285–329.
Brownsword, R. (2008). Regulating nanomedicine—the smallest of our concerns? Nanoethics, 2, 73–86.
Clarke, S. (2005). Future technologies dystopic futures and the precautionary principle. Ethics and Information Technology, 7, 121–126.
Davies, S. (2007). Nanotechnologies—small scale big impact. Consumer Policy Review, 17(4), 99–103.
Dorbeck-Jung, B. (2007). What can prudent public regulators learn from the United Kingdom government’s nanotechnological regulatory activities? Nanoethics, 1, 257–270.
Dubinsky, A. J., & Loken, B. (1989). Analyzing ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 19, 83–107.
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, H. P., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51, 11–27.
Ferrell, B. J., & Fraedrich, J. (1994). Business ethics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. B. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision-making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87–96.
Ferrell, O. C., LeClair, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (1998). The federal sentencing guidelines for organizations: A framework for ethical compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(4), 353–363.
Fink, M., Harms, R., & Kraus, S. (2008). Cooperative internationalization of SMEs: Self-commitment as a success factor for international entrepreneurship. European Management Journal, 26(6), 429–440.
Fink, M., & Kessler, A. (2009). Cooperation trust and performance: Empirical results from three countries. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 469–483.
Fisher, E. (2007). Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. Nanoethics, 1, 155–165.
Frankel, M. S. (1989). Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact? Journal of Business Ethics, 8(2/3), 109–115.
Fricker, R. D., & Schonlau, M. (2002). Advantages and disadvantages of internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14(4), 347–367.
Friedell, E. (1983). Selbstanzeige. Essays ab 1919. Vienna: Loecker.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gaumnitz, B. R., & Lere, J. C. (2002). Contents of codes of ethics of professional business organizations in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(1), 35–49.
Goldberg, S. (2009). Nanotechnology may be tiny, but exposures could be huge. National Underwriter, Life and Health, 113(46), 21–23.
Guerra, G. (2008). European regulatory issues in nanomedicine. Nanoethics, 2, 87–97.
Haas, K. M. (2009). Nanotechnology: Risks and rewards. Best’s Review, 110(2), 92.
Haase, M. (2008). Customer integration and beyond. Towards a business economic–ethical theory of the firm. In D. Baur, F. Birke, J. Fehling, B. Hollstein, & M. Lee-Peuker (Eds.), European business and economic ethics (pp. 129–152). Mering : Zfuw.
Hood, E. (2004). Nanotechnoloy: Looking as we leap. Environmental Health Perspective, 112(13), 740–749.
Hyman, R. (1987). Strategy or structure? Capital, labour and control. Work, Employment & Society, 1(1), 25–55.
Jensen, J. V. (1987). Ethical tension points in whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), 321–328.
Kitcher, P. (2007). Scientific research—who should govern? Nanoethics, 1, 177–184.
Knorr, K. (1977). ‘Producing and reproducing knowledge: Descriptive or constructive? Towards a model of research production. Social Science Information, 16(6), 669–696.
Knouse, S. B., Hill, V. D., & Hamilton, J. B. (2007). Curves in the high road: A historical analysis of the development of american business codes of ethics. Journal of Management History, 13(1), 94–107.
Kuzma, J., & Besley, J. C. (2008). Ethics of risk analysis and regulatory review: From bio- to nanotechnology. Nanoethics, 2, 149–162.
Kyobe, M. (2009). Factors influencing SME compliance with government regulation on use of IT: The case of South Africa. Journal of Global Information Management, 17(2), 30–47.
Langfred, C. W., & Moye, N. A. (2004). Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 934–945.
Lee, R., & Jose, P. D. (2008). Self-interest, self-restraint and corporate responsibility for nanotechnologies: Emerging dilemmas for modern managers. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(1), 113–125.
Linstone, H. A. (2011). Three areas of technology foresight. Technovation, 31, 69–76.
Linton, J., & Walsh, S. (2004). Integrating innovation and learning curve theory: An enabler for moving nanotechnologies and other emerging process technologies into production. R&D Management, 34(5), 517–526.
Linton, J., & Walsh, S. (2008a). Acceleration and extension of opportunity recognition for nanotechnologies and other emerging technologies. International Small Business Journal, 26(1), 83–99.
Linton, J., & Walsh, S. (2008b). A theory for innovation of process-based innovations such as nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(5), 583–594.
Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Luther, W. (2004). Industrial application of nanomaterials—chances and risks: Technology analysis. In W. Luther (Ed.), Future technologies (Vol. 54, pp. 1–119). Duesseldorf: Future Technologies Division of VDI Technologiezentrum GmbH.
Maitland, I. (1985). The limits of business self-regulation. California Management Review, 27(3), 132–146.
Manfreda, K. L., Bosniak, M., & Berzelak, J. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes—a meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79–105.
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.
McCoy, R. (2000). Science and biotechnology: The dark side. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 37(1/2), 147–168.
McDonald, G., & Nijhof, A. (1999). Beyond codes of ethics: An integrated framework for stimulating morally responsible behaviour in organization. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20(3), 133–147.
Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339.
Morrell, K. (2008). The narrative of ‘evidence based’ management: A polemic. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 613–635.
Muris, T. J. (1981). Opportunistic behaviour and the law of contracts. Minnesota Law Review, 65(4), 521–590.
Nijhof, A., Cludts, S., Fisscher, O., & Laan, A. (2003). Measuring the implementation of codes of conduct. An assessment method based on a process approach of the responsible organisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 65–78.
Nooteboom, B. (1996). Trust opportunism and governance: A process and control model. Organization Studies, 17, 985–1010.
O’Driscoll, G. P., & Hoskins, L. (2006). The case for market-based regulation. Cato Journal, 26(3), 469–487.
Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001). Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12(1), 37–53.
Petersen, A., & Anderson, A. (2007). A question of balance or blind faith? Scientists’ and science policymakers’ representations of the benefits and risks of nanotechnology. Nanoethics, 1, 243–256.
Posner, R. A. (1997). Social norms and the law: An economic approach. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 365–369.
Ring, P., & van den Ven, A. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498.
Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2001). Nanotechnology goals. In M. C. Roco & W. S. Bainbridge (Eds.), Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology (pp. 3–12). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2005). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7, 1–13.
Rogelberg, S. G., & Stanton, J. M. (2007). Introduction: Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 195–209.
Romig, A. D., Jr, Baker, A. B., Johannes, J., Zipperian, Th., Eijkel, K., Kirchhoff, B., et al. (2007). An introduction to nanotechnology policy: Opportunities and constraints for emerging and established economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(9), 1634–1642.
Schuetz, A. (1972). The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann.
Shafer, W. E., Fukukawa, K., & Lee, G. M. (2007). Values and the perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility: The US versus China. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 265–284.
Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship university spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Siegrist, M., Keller, C., Kastenholz, H., Frey, S., & Wiek, A. (2007). Laypeople’s and experts’ Perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Analysis, 27(1), 59–69.
Silver, D. (2005). Corporate codes of conduct and the value of autonomy. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 3–8.
Thukral, I. S., Von Ehr, J., Walsh, S., Groen, A. J., van der Sijde, P., & Adham, K. A. (2008). Entrepreneurship emerging technologies, emerging markets. International Small Business Journal, 26, 101–116.
Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision-making in organizations: A person–situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2005). Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1143–1158.
van Calster, G. (2008). Risk regulation, EU law and emerging technologies: Smother or smooth? Nanoethics, 2, 61–71.
Wernerfelt, B., & Montgomery, C. A. (1986). What is an attractive industry? Management Science, 32(10), 1223–1231.
Williamson, O. E., & Craswell, R. (1993). Calculativeness trust and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 453–486.
Wonglimipiyarat, J. (2005). The nano-revolution of Schumpeter’s Kontratieff cycle. Technovation, 15, 1349–1354.
Yanez, M., Khalil, T. M., & Walsh, S. T. (2010). IAMOT and education: Defining a technology and innovation management (TIM) body-of-knowledge (BoK) for graduate education (TIM BoK). Technovation, 30(7–8), 389–400.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fink, M., Harms, R. & Hatak, I. Nanotechnology and Ethics: The Role of Regulation Versus Self-Commitment in Shaping Researchers’ Behavior. J Bus Ethics 109, 569–581 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1431-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1431-2