Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can Parental Bonding Be Assessed in Children? Factor Structure and Factorial Invariance of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) Between Adults and Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child Psychiatry & Human Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the factorial structure of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) in the Greek population. Using confirmatory factor analysis different proposed models of the basic dimensions of PBI were evaluated. The results indicated that Kendler’s three-factor (i.e. care, protectiveness and authoritarianism) solution was found to be more satisfactory than the other competing two-, three- and four-factor models. A second aim was the investigation of the factorial invariance of the PBI across different age groups (adults vs. children). The results revealed that PBI can be used in children samples (measurement invariance) but it seems that PBI latent variables may be perceived differently across different age groups (not structural invariance). The authors conclude that further research is needed in order to understand whether the differences are due to actual developmental changes in children’s perceptions of the parent–child relationship or conceptual problems regarding the children’s ability to conceive the PBI’s theoretical constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parker G, Tupling H, Brown LB (1979) A Parental Bonding Instrument. Br J Med Psychol 52:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kendler KS (1996) Parenting: a genetic-epidemiologic perspective. Am J Psychol 153:11–20

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kendler KS, Sham PS, MacLean CJ (1997) The determinants of parenting: an epidemiological, multi-informant, retrospective study. Psychol Med 27:549–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kay W, Parker G (1990) Reliability of the Parental Bonding Instrument and intimate bond measure scales. Aust NZ J Psychol 24:199–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilhelm K, Niven H, Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D (2005) The stability of the Parental Bonding Instrument over a 20-year period. Psychol Med 35:387–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arrindell WA, Hanewald GJFP, Kolk AM (1989) Cross-national constancy of dimensions of parental rearing style: the Dutch version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). Pers Indiv Diff 10:949–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Narita T, Sato T, Hirano S, Gota M, Sakado K, Uehara T (2000) Parental child-rearing behavior as measured by the Parental Bonding Instrument in a Japanese population: factor structure and relationship to a lifetime history of depression. J Affect Disord 57:229–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker G (1990) The Parental Bonding Instrument. A decade of research. Soc Psych Psychol Epidemiol 25:281–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilcox HC, Grados M, Samuels J, Riddle MA, Bienvenu OJ III, Pinto A et al (2008) The association between parental bonding and obsessive compulsive disorder in offspring at high familial risk. J Affect Disord 111:31–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cubis J, Lewin T, Dawes F (1989) Australian adolescents’ perceptions of their parents. Aust NZ J Psychol 23:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gómez-Beneyto M, Pedrós A, Tomàs A, Aguilar K, Leal C (1993) Psychometric properties of the parental bonding instrument in a Spanish sample. Soc Psych Psychol Epidemiol 28:252–255

    Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy E, Brewin C, Silka L (1997) The assessment of parenting using Parental Bonding Instrument: two or three factors? Psychol Med 27:333–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohr S, Preisig M, Fenton BT, Ferrero F (1999) Validation of the French version of the parental bonding instrument in adults. Pers Indiv Diff 25:1065–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sato T, Narita T, Hirano S, Kusunoki K, Sakado K, Uehara T (1999) Confirmatory factorial analysis of the Parental Bonding Instrument in Japanese population. Psychol Med 29:127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Qadir F, Stewart R, Khan M, Prince M (2005) The validity of the Parental Bonding Instrument as a measure of maternal bonding among young Pakistani women. Soc Psych Psychol Epidemiol 40:276–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu J, Li L, Fang F (2010) Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Parental Bonding Instrument. Int J Nurs Stud 48:582–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Uji M, Tanaka N, Shono M, Kitamura T (2006) Factorial structure of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) in Japan: a study of cultural, developmental, and gender influences. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 37:115–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hurley AE, Scandura TA, Schriesheim CA, Brannick MT, Seers A, Vandenberg RJ et al (1997) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives. J Organ Behav 18:667–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Widaman KF (1993) Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivar Behav Res 28:263–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Russell DW (2002) In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in personality and social psychology bulletin. Pers Soc Psychol B 28:1629–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cox BJ, Enns MW, Clara IP (2000) The Parental Bonding Instrument: confirmatory evidence for a three-factor model in a psychiatric clinical sample and in the National Comorbidity Survey. Soc Psych Psychol Epidemiol 35:353–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Terra L, Hauck S, Schestatsky S, Fillipon AP, Sanchez P, Hirakata V et al (2009) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Parental Bonding Instrument in a Brazilian female population. Aus NZ J Psychol 43:348–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Collins WA, Russell G (1991) Mother–child and father–child relationships in middle childhood in adolescence: a developmental analysis. Dev Rev 11:137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shanahan L, McHale SM, Crouter AC, Osgood DW (2007) Warmth with mothers and fathers from middle childhood to late adolescence: Within- and between-families comparisons. Dev Psychol 43:551–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Furman W, Buhrmester D (1992) Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of social relationships. Child Dev 63:103–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stein D, Williamson DE, Birmaher B, Brent DA, Kaufman J, Dahl RE et al (2000) Parent–child bonding and family functioning in depressed children and children at high risk and low risk for future depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:1387–1395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sideridis G, Kafetsios K (2008) Perceived parental bonding, fear of failure and tress at school. Int J Behav Dev 32:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reuterkiïold L (2009) Fears, anxieties and cognitive behavioral treatment of specific phobias in youth. University of Stockholm, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arbuckle JL (2009) Amos 18 user’s guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  30. Griffin P (2005) Developing a measure of wealth for primary student families in a developing country: comparison of two methods of psychometric calibration. Stud Educ Eval 31:192–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 6:1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Byrne BM (2006) Structural equation modeling with EQS: basic concepts, applications and programming, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Briggs SR, Cheek JM (1986) The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J Pers 54:106–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Finney SJ, DiStefano C (2006) Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO (eds) A second course in structural equation modeling. Information Age, Greenwich, pp 269–314

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bentler PM (2005) EQS for windows 6.1 [computer software]. Multivariate Software, Encino

    Google Scholar 

  37. Muthén B, Kaplan D (1985) A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. Brit J MathStat Psy 38:171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. DeCarlo LT (1997) On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychol Methods 2:292–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bollen KA, Stine R (1992) Bootstrapping goodness of fit measures in structural equation models. Sociol Method Res 21:205–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. MacCallum RC, Roznowski M, Necowitz LB (1992) Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychol Bull 111:490–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cheung GW, Renswold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling 9:233–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Russell A, Aloa V, Feder T, Glover A, Miller H, Palmer G (1998) Sex-based differences in parenting styles in a sample with preschool children. Aust J Psychol 50:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Winsler A, Madigan AL, Aquilino SA (2005) Correspondence between maternal and paternal parenting styles in early childhood. Early Child Res Q 20:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hart CH, Robinson CC (1994) Comparative study of maternal and paternal disciplinary strategies. Psychol Rep 74:495–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Crete, Rethymno, Greece

    Ioannis Tsaousis, Katerina Mascha & Theodoros Giovazolias

  2. Tsakalof 10, Rd., 151 26, Maroussi, Athens, Greece

    Ioannis Tsaousis

Authors
  1. Ioannis Tsaousis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katerina Mascha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Theodoros Giovazolias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Tsaousis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsaousis, I., Mascha, K. & Giovazolias, T. Can Parental Bonding Be Assessed in Children? Factor Structure and Factorial Invariance of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI) Between Adults and Children. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 43, 238–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0260-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0260-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation