Abstract
Iteration during the design process is an essential element. Engineers optimize their design by iteration. Research on iteration in Primary Design Education is however scarce; possibly teachers believe they do not have enough time for iteration in daily classroom practices. Spontaneous playing behavior of children indicates that iteration fits in a natural way of learning. To demonstrate the importance of iteration for the design performance and understand what occurs in an optimized situation a study was conducted in a Dutch Montessori school. Four conditions were chosen to shape the design assignment; iteration, freedom of choice, collaboration and presentation. The choice for these conditions was inspired by the work of Montessori, and because of the positive effects on design performance during previous design and technology projects. This led to a concrete assignment, suitable for 6–8 years old, “Fold a piece of aluminum foil so it can hold the weight of marbles when it lies on the water. The more marbles it can hold the better.” Self correction was possible as the challenge lays in the ease to improve countable results. Clear results of iteration could be determined; an increasing sense of control and detailed insight in what to do for maximum results were found amongst the pupils. Additional literature about capability development and metacognition confirmed the value of the four conditions in relation to the observed results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bamberger, Y. M., & Cahill, C. S. (2013). Teaching design in middle school: Instructors’ concerns and scaffolding strategies. Journal Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 171–185.
Cao, D. X., Han, Y. H., Yang, J., Yang, G., & Cui, C. X. (2008). Integrated modeling towards collaborative product development. Advanced Materials Research, 44–46, 669–676.
Chiu, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2012). The role of self-monitoring in learning chemistry with dynamic visualizations. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 133–163). New York: Springer.
Chusilp, P., & Jin, Y. (2006). Impact of mental iteration on concept generation. Transactions of the ASME, 128, 14–25.
Circuit assignments from http://www.proefjes.nl/.
Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education & learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
Cropley, A. J., & Urban, K. K. (2000). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. Subotnik, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 485–498). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
De Bono, E. (2009). Think! before it’s too late. London: Vermilion, Ebury Publishing.
Design assignment retrieved on September, 2011 from http://techniektoernooi.nl/landelijk/wp-content/uploads/lesbriefknikkerboot2012.pdf.
Dewey, J. (1899/1976). Play and imagination in relation to early education. In The middle works 1 (pp. 339–343). Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Falk, A., & Brodsky, L. (2013). Scientific argumentation as a foundation for the design of inquiry-based science instruction. In The journal of mathematics and science: Collaborative explorations, 13 (pp. 27–55). Richmond: Virginia Mathematics and Science Coalition.
Ford, C. L., & Yore, L. D. (2012). Toward convergence of critical thinking, metacognition, and reflection: Illustrations from natural and social sciences, teacher education, and classroom practice. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 251–271). New York: Springer.
Grotzer, T., & Mittlefehldt, S. (2012). The role of metacognition in children’s understanding and transfer of explanatory structures in science. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 79–99). New York: Springer.
Gurnani, A., & Lewis, K. (2008). Collaborative, decentralized engineering design at the edge of rationality. Journal of Mechanical Design, 130, 121101-1–121101-9.
Hannaford, C. (2005). Smart moves (2nd ed.). Salt Lake City: Great River Books.
Herscovitz, O., Kaberman, Z., Saar, L., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). The relationship between metacognition and the ability to pose questions in chemical education. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 165–195). New York: Springer.
Jones, A., Buntting, C., & de Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 191–212.
Kimbell, R., & Stables, K. (2007). Researching design learning. Issues and findings from two decades of research and development. Dordrecht: Springer.
Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company.
Montessori, M. (1949). The absorbent mind. Madras: Theosophical Publishing House.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2012). Reading science: How a naive view of reading hinders so much else. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 37–56). New York: Springer.
Piaget, J., & InHelder, B. (1972). The psychology of the child. New York: The Perseus Books Group.
Schraw, G., Olafson, L., Weibel, M., & Sewing, D. (2012). Metacognitive knowledge and field-based science learning in an outdoor environmental education program. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 57–77). New York: Springer.
Simon, H. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1966). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Voprosy psikhologii, No. 6. (trans: Catherine Mulholland). The Marxist Internet Archive.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London: J. Cape.
Whitebread, D., & Grau Cardenas, V. (2012). Self-regulated learning and conceptual development of biological understanding. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 101–132). New York: Springer.
Zohar, A. (2012). Explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge: Definitions, children’s learning, and teachers’ professional development. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 197–223). New York: Springer.
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Introduction. In A. Zohar & Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (contemporary trends and issues in science education, 40) (pp. 1–19). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Looijenga, A., Klapwijk, R. & de Vries, M.J. The effect of iteration on the design performance of primary school children. Int J Technol Des Educ 25, 1–23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9271-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9271-2