Skip to main content
Log in

Citizens’ Perceptions on Water Conservation Policies and the Role of Social Capital

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Planning and implementing environmental policies for the sustainable management of water resources is a challenging task. In order to improve the effectiveness of these policies it is essential to explore their social implications. The present article aims to investigate environmental policies focusing on domestic water conservation and their interconnection with social capital elements. In particular, by means of an empirical study conducted in an insular community of Greece, citizens’ perceptions are explored concerning the restrictions imposed from different environmental policy instruments for water consumption and their perceived level of effectiveness. Furthermore, the influence of social capital parameters on these perceptions is investigated. Aggregated indicators of social capital are estimated with Confirmatory Factor Analysis measuring social and institutional trust, participation in social networks and compliance with social norms. Through the results of ordinal regression models it is evident that significant connections exist between elements of social capital and perceptions of citizens towards water consumption policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken C, McMahon T, Wearing A, Finlayson B (1994) Residential water use: predicting and reducing consumption. J Appl Soc Psychol 21:611–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker KJ (2001) Paying for water: water pricing and equity in England and Wales. Trans Inst Br Geogr 26:143–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beierle TC, Cayford J (2002) Democracy in practice. Public Participation in Environmental Decisions (Washington D.C., Resources for the Future)

  • Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manag 90:1692–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beugelsdijk S, Van Schaik T (2005) Differences in social capital between 54 Western European Regions. Reg Stud 39:1053–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch C, Altman S, Al-Moumin M, Troell J, Roffman E (2007) Legal framework governing water in the Middle East and North Africa. Int J Water Resour Dev 23:595–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo V, Frias-Armenta M (2006) Personal normative beliefs, antisocial behavior, and residential water conservation. Environ Behav 38:406–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Verdugo V, Bechtel BR, Fraijo-Sing BL (2003) Environmental beliefs and water conservation: an empirical study. J Environ Psychol 23:227–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramb RA (2005) Social capital and soil conservation: evidence from the Philippines. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 49:211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cvetkovich G, Winter PL (2003) Trust and social representations of the management of threatened and endangered species. Environ Behav 35:286–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliver M (1999) Attitudes and inaction: a case study of the manifest demographics of urban water conservation. Environ Behav 31:372–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos PG, Siamantziouras ASD, Galanidis A, Mprezetou I, Troumbis AY (2006) The interactive effects of fire and diversity on short-term responses of ecosystem processes in experimental Mediterranean grasslands. Environ Manage 37:826–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genius M, Hatzaki E, Kouromichelaki EM, Kouvakis G, Nikiforaki S, Tsagarakis KP (2008) Evaluating consumers’ willingness to pay for improved potable water quality and quantity. Water Resour Manag 22:1825–1834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer-Allély E, Zacarias-Farah A (2002) Policies and instruments for promoting sustainable household consumption. J Clean Prod 11:923–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory GD, Di Leo M (2003) Repeated behavior and environmental psychology: the role of personal involvement and habit formation in explaining water consumption. J Appl Soc Psychol 6:1261–1296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RC, Tsur Y, Roe TL, Doukkali R, Dinar A (2002) Pricing irrigation water: a review of theory and practice. Water Policy 4:173–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N, Ravnborg HM, Westermann O, Probst K (2002) User participation in watershed management and research. Water Policy 3:507–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones N (2010) Investigating the influence of social costs and benefits of environmental policies through social capital theory. Policy Sci 43:229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones N, Malesios C, Iosifides T, Sophoulis CM (2008) Social capital in Greece: measurement and comparative perspectives. South Eur Soc Polit 13:173–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones N, Sophoulis CM, Iosifides T, Botetzagias I, Evangelinos K (2009) The influence of social capital on environmental policy instruments. Env Polit 18:595–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen B, Graymore M, O’Toole K (2009) Household water use behavior: an integrated model. J Environ Manag 91:227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarzi AR, Sharifzadeh M, Kamgar Haghighi AA, Amin S, Keshtkar Sh, Bamdad A (2006) Rural domestic water consumption behavior: a case study in Ramjerd area, Fars province, I.R., Iran. Water Res 40:1173–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JY (2005) Bowling together isn’t a cure-all: the relationship between social capital and political trust in South Korea. Int Polit Sci Rev 26:193–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar MD (2000) Institutional framework for managing groundwater: a case study of community organisations in Gujarat, India. Water Policy 2:423–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levallois P, Guevin N, Gingras S, Levesque B, Weber JP, Letarte R (1998) New patterns of drinking-water consumption: results of a pilot study. Sci Total Environ 209:233–241

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay J, Moeller A (2002) Are mandatory regulations required for water quality in Australia? Water Policy 4:95–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegaki AN, Hanley N, Tsagarakis KP (2007) The social acceptability and valuation of recycled water in Crete: a study of consumers’ and farmers’ attitudes. Ecol Econ 62:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosterta E, Crapsb M, Pahl-Wostlc C (2008) Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management? Water Int 33:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan D, Cassidy MF (2001) A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: development and validation of a social capital inventory. Curr Sociol 49:59–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton K, Norris P (2000) Confidence in Public Institutions: faith, culture, or performance? In: Pharr SJ, Putnam R (eds) Disaffected democracies: what’s troubling the trilateral countries. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Portnov BA, Meir I (2008) Urban water consumption in Israel: convergence of divergence? Environ Sci Policy 11:347–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302:1912–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R, Leonardi R, Nanetti RY (1993) Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph B, Troy P (2008) Attitudes to conservation and water consumption. Environ Sci Policy 11:441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resurreccion BP (2006) Rules, roles and rights: gender, participation and community fisheries management in Cambodia’s Tonle Sap region. Int J Water Resour Dev 22:433–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P, de Silva R, Bhatia R (2002) Water is an economic good: how to use prices to promote equity, efficiency and sustainability. Water Policy 4:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme GJ, Nancarrow BE, Seligman C (2000) The evaluation of information campaigns to promote voluntary household water conservation. Eval Rev 24:539–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oorschot W, Arts W, Gelissen J (2006) Social capital in Europe. Measurement and social and regional distribution of a multifaceted phenomenon. Acta Sociol 49:149–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner CL, Fernandez-Gimenez ME (2008) Does community-based collaborative resource management increase social capital? Soc Nat Resour 21:324–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield S, Elliott S, Eyles J, Cole D (2006) Taking environmental action: the role of local composition context, and collective. Environ Manage 37:40–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentz EA, Gober P (2007) Determinants of small-area water consumption for the city of Phoenix, Arizona. Water Resour Manag 21:1849–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse A (2006) Social capital and economic development in regional Australia: a case study. J Rural Stud 22:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikoleta Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, N., Evangelinos, K., Gaganis, P. et al. Citizens’ Perceptions on Water Conservation Policies and the Role of Social Capital. Water Resour Manage 25, 509–522 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9711-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-010-9711-z

Keywords

Navigation