Skip to main content
Log in

Addendum to the article: Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: Would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment?

  • Short Research and Discussion Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argued recently that the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) are valuable metrics to include during null hypothesis significance testing: They inform the researcher about the probability of statistically significant and non-significant test outcomes actually being true. Although commonly misunderstood, a reported p value estimates only the probability of obtaining the results or more extreme results if the null hypothesis of no effect was true. Calculations of the more informative PPV and NPV require a priori estimate of the probability (R). The present document discusses challenges of estimating R.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bundschuh M, Newman MC, Zubrod JP, Seitz F, Rosenfeldt RR, Schulz R (2013) Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: Would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment? Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7341–7347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why most published research findings are false. Plos Med 2:696–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannidis JP, Tarone R, McLaughlin JK (2011) The false-positive to false-negative ratio in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol 22:450–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MC (2008) “What exactly are you inferring?” A closer look at hypothesis testing. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1013–1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman MC (2010) Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman MC (2013) Quantitative ecotoxicology. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N (2004) Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Nation Cancer Inst 96:434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirco Bundschuh.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bundschuh, M., Newman, M.C., Zubrod, J.P. et al. Addendum to the article: Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: Would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 3955–3957 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3749-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3749-z

Keywords

Navigation