Abstract
We argued recently that the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) are valuable metrics to include during null hypothesis significance testing: They inform the researcher about the probability of statistically significant and non-significant test outcomes actually being true. Although commonly misunderstood, a reported p value estimates only the probability of obtaining the results or more extreme results if the null hypothesis of no effect was true. Calculations of the more informative PPV and NPV require a priori estimate of the probability (R). The present document discusses challenges of estimating R.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bundschuh M, Newman MC, Zubrod JP, Seitz F, Rosenfeldt RR, Schulz R (2013) Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: Would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment? Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7341–7347
Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why most published research findings are false. Plos Med 2:696–701
Ioannidis JP, Tarone R, McLaughlin JK (2011) The false-positive to false-negative ratio in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol 22:450–456
Newman MC (2008) “What exactly are you inferring?” A closer look at hypothesis testing. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1013–1019
Newman MC (2010) Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton
Newman MC (2013) Quantitative ecotoxicology. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N (2004) Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Nation Cancer Inst 96:434–442
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bundschuh, M., Newman, M.C., Zubrod, J.P. et al. Addendum to the article: Misuse of null hypothesis significance testing: Would estimation of positive and negative predictive values improve certainty of chemical risk assessment?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 3955–3957 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3749-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3749-z