Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Marketing View of the Customer and the Service Dominant Logic Perspective

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Business Market Management

Abstract

Based on the concept of service-dominant logic as the emerging organizing logic of marketing that would replace the traditional goods-dominant view, Vargo and Lusch (2004) originally proposed that among several other approaches to research and marketing practice that had emerged, relationship marketing would be subsumed by this broader view. More recently, however, Vargo (2009) suggested that because relationship marketing focuses on increasing the series of on-going transactions with a customer, coupled with the goal of enhancing their long-term patronage, that relationship marketing extends the goods-dominant perspective, rather than transcending into the service-dominant logic. This article counters that the relationship marketing view of the customer has already transcended the goods-dominant view to the to service-dominant view based on the way that customers are brought into the relationship as active participants in the service creation, and act as “co-producers” of value. To address the apparent goods-dominant approach in two widely used relationship marketing practices and measures, customer relationship management and customer lifetime value, this article proposes that these tools can be used from a goods-dominant view, but they can also serve as essential steps towards the practice of relationship marketing from the service-dominant logic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berry, L. (1983). Relationship marketing. In L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostack, & G. D. Upah (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on services marketing (pp. 25–26). Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, R. F., Schurr, P., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer–seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(April), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, T. W. (1997). Relationship marketing: The route to marketing efficiency and effectiveness. Business Horizons, November-December, 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski A.(2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronroos, C. (2004). The relationship marketing process: Communication, interaction, dialogue, value. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 19(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (1987). The new marketing—Developing long-term interactive relationships. Long Range Planning, 20(4), 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (1996). Relationship marketing: The emperor’s new clothes or paradigm shift? Research methodologies for ‘The New Marketing’ (pp. 3–19). Latimer: ESOMAR/EMAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, K., Gremler, D., & Bitner, M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in services industries: The customer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. (2003). A Framework for Marketing Management. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

  • Morgan, R., & Hunt, S. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, July, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, July–August, 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrof, J. (1997). Relationship marketing: The wheel reinvented? Business Horizons, November–December, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham, N., Friedman, L., & Ruff, R. (1995). Getting Partnering Right. Columbus: McGraw-Hill.

  • Sheth, J., & Parvatiyar, A. (1995a). The evolution of relationship marketing. International Business Review, 4(4), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J., & Parvatiyar, A. (1995b). Relationship marketing in consumer markets: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J., & Mittal, B. (2004). Consumer behavior: A managerial perspective. Thompson: Southwestern Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, H. B. (1986). Networks: Between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(January), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch R. F. (2008). Service dominant logic: Continuing the evolutions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(Spring), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. (2009). Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: A service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. E. Jr. (1992). The changing role of marketing in the corporation. Journal of Marketing, October, 1–17.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas W. Gruen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gruen, T.W., Hofstetter, J.S. The Relationship Marketing View of the Customer and the Service Dominant Logic Perspective. J Bus Mark Manag 4, 231–245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12087-010-0043-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12087-010-0043-3

Keywords

Navigation