Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 102, Issue 3, February 2011, Pages 2481-2486
Bioresource Technology

Application of ozone based treatments of secondary effluents

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.028Get rights and content

Abstract

The present work was aimed at studying the efficiency of ozone in oxidation processes, coliform inactivation and Disinfection Byproducts (DBPs) formation, associated with the potential of ozone to increase the Biodegradable Dissolved Organic Carbon (BDOC) in secondary effluent with applied ozone doses of 5.0, 10.0 and 15.0 mg/L for contact times of 2, 5 and 10 min. The wastewater used in this work was collected from the Bhagwanpur Sewage Treatment Plant, Varanasi, India. Results of this experiment showed that 10 mg O3/L O3 for 5 min exposure was found most suitable dose for highest degradation of COD, TOC, UV254, color, turbidity and total nitrogen parameters. The inactivation range of microbial biomass range was found in between 95% and 98%. Experiment revealed the fact that aldehydes and carboxylic acid formation were significantly related with the ozone dose and exposure time and ozone might enhance the treatment efficiency of secondary effluent treatment.

Introduction

Ozone, a highly oxidative agent, react directly or via a hydroxyl radical mechanism results into the reduction of organic content with increase of biodegradability of natural organic matter and the efficient inactivation of a wide range of microorganisms (Gottschalk et al., 2000, Takanashi et al., 2002, Xu et al., 2002, Liberti and Notarnicola, 1999). Ozonation has been used to meet discharge requirements for coliform and virus inactivation since the 1970s (Rice et al., 1981). Frequent ozonation for treatment of wastewater and drinking water is due to its ability to oxidize complex organic molecules, phenols, Endocrine Disruptive Chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals (Zwiener and Frimmel, 2000, Huber et al., 2005, Snyder et al., 2006, Kim and Tanaka, 2010). In combination of microbial disinfection make ozonation an attractive alternative for advanced wastewater treatment (Wert et al., 2007).

Generally, in the secondary treated sewage effluents, proportion of biodegradable COD which can be indicated by Biodegradable Dissolved Organic Carbon (BDOC) is relatively low. Therefore, in order to improve the treatment efficiency, a powerful oxidant which increases the BDOC of the influent is necessary. Ozone can transform some refractory organic matters to biodegradable organic ones, that is, BDOC, which can be removed easily through biodegradation process. Earlier workers reports that ozone may increase the biodegradability of organic pollutants (including natural organic matter) and induce the efficient inactivation of a wide range of microorganisms (Langlais et al., 1992, Agustina and Vareek, 2005, Wang et al., 2008, Yang et al., 2004). Microbial disinfection with the trace contaminant oxidation makes ozonation an attractive alternative for advanced wastewater treatment (Wert et al., 2007). Earlier, corona discharge was the main source for the generation of Ozone, which requires much higher resource and economy for the treatment of water with ozone. So, it was limited to certain areas viz UV lights for the drinking water treatment. Due to aforesaid reasons it was not only feasible for treatment of municipal sewage. Recent ozone generation techniques viz UV lights require lower energy consequently; costs are also reduced making the field application of Ozonation economically viable (Freire et al., 2001a, Freire et al., 2001b, Jennifer et al., 2010).

During past few decades chlorination was favored as the most common method for disinfecting wastewater effluents, because of its effectiveness, relative ease of use and low cost. However, reports indicate the fact that the chlorination of water and wastewater with organic compounds can lead to the formation of Disinfection Byproducts (DBPs) such as Trihalomethanes (THMs) (Jennifer et al., 2010) which enhances the regrowth of bacterial population, make it potentially carcinogenic and mutagenic. Also, the secondary by products are difficult to analyze and even more hazardous (Silva et al., 2010). These facts have resulted in decreased application of chlorination for disinfection on the hand ozonation, because of the several advantages over the later has been increased. Application of ozonation for wastewater treatment is more prevalent due to non production of some Disinfection Byproducts as Trihalomethans (THMs) or other chlorinated Disinfection Byproducts (DBPs) etc. (Jennifer et al., 2010).

Low molecular aliphatic organics like aldehydes, carboxylic acids are the major organic DBPs resulting from the Ozonation process. Concentration of Dissolve Organic Carbon (DOC) were greater as compare to the surface water (Buffle et al., 2006) so higher ozone dosage are required in wastewater treatment which leads more DBPs formation (Langlais et al., 1991, Melin and Odegaard, 2000, Huang et al., 2005).

Though ozonation is becoming popular for wastewater treatment, however, more studies are required to establish this method for wastewater treatment. Therefore, present study was performed with the aim to assess the extent of the removal of physico-chemical and microbial parameters as well as the formation of Disinfection Byproducts (DBPs) with different ozone dose and contact time.

Section snippets

Study area

Present study was conducted in Varanasi city (82° 15′ E to 83° 30′ E and 24° 35′ N to 25° 30′ N). It was estimated that approximately 275 million liters per day (MLD) wastewater was generated, out of which only 122 MLD was treated and remaining 153 MLD untreated wastewater was discharged into the river Ganga. There were three sewage treatment plants established in the city located at Dinapur, Bhagwanpur and Diesel Locomotive Works (DLW) with the treatment capacities of 100 MLD, 12 MLD and 10

Physicochemical characteristics of unozonized and ozonized secondary effluents

Ozonation experiments were performed under semi-batch operation of the bubble column reactor. The applied ozone doses varied between 2.0 and 15 mg O3/L of O3, while the ozonation process lasted from 2 to 20 min. The efficiency of ozonation to upgrade the effluents quality was strongly depended upon the supplied ozone dose. Kim and Tanaka (2010), has also reported that an ozone dose of 6 mg/L (contact time = 10 min) was found to reduce the concentration of most pharmaceuticals detected in secondary

Conclusion

In the present work, the effect of different ozone doses with different contact times was studied on the physicochemical characteristics, microbiological biomass and the Disinfection Byproducts (DBPs) of secondary effluents. This study reveals that the ozone dose of 10 mg O3/L with the contact time of 5 min show a significant reduction in physico-chemical as well as in microbial parameters of secondary effluent. At this experimental dose and duration the production of DBPs did not increased

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to CEST (Centre for Environmental Science and Technology), Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221 005, India, for providing laboratory facilities and financial support.

References (35)

  • T.E. Agustina et al.

    A review of synergistic effect of photocatalysis and ozonation on wastewater treatment

    Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology. C

    (2005)
  • Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

    (1998)
  • F.J. Beltran et al.

    Integration of continuous biological and chemical (ozone) treatment of domestic wastewater: 1. Biodegradation and post-ozonation

    Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology

    (1999)
  • M.O. Buffle et al.

    Measurement of the initial phase of ozone decomposition in water and wastewater by means of a continuous quench-flow system: application to disinfection and pharmaceutical oxidation

    Water Research

    (2006)
  • Z.S. Can et al.

    Formaldehyde formation during ozonation of drinking water

    Ozone: Science and Engineering

    (2003)
  • Environmental Protection Agency, 1982. Handbook for Sampling and Sample Preservation of Water and Wastewater. EPA...
  • R.S. Freire et al.

    Remediation and toxicity removal from Kraft E1 paper mill effluent treatment with ozone

    Environmental Technology

    (2001)
  • R.S. Freire et al.

    Remediation and toxicity removal from Kraft E1 paper mill effluent by ozonization

    Environmental Technology

    (2001)
  • C. Gottschalk et al.

    Ozonation of Water and Wastewater: A Practical Guide to Understanding Ozone and its Application

    (2000)
  • W.-J. Huang et al.

    The determination and fate of disinfection by-products from ozonation of polluted raw water

    Science of the Total Environment

    (2005)
  • M.M. Huber et al.

    Oxidation of pharmaceuticals during ozonation of municipal wastewater effluents: a pilot study

    Environmental Science & Technology

    (2005)
  • G.A. Jennifer et al.

    Effects of oxygenation on ammonia oxidation potential and microbial diversity in sediment from surface-flow wetland mesocosms

    Bioresource Technology

    (2010)
  • I. Kim et al.

    Use of ozone-based processes for the removal of pharmaceuticals detected in a wastewater treatment plant

    Water Environment Research

    (2010)
  • A. Langlais et al.

    Study of the nature of the byproducts formed and risks of toxicity when disinfecting a secondary effluent with ozone

    Water Science and Technology

    (1992)
  • B. Langlais et al.

    Ozone in Water Treatment: Application and Engineering

    (1991)
  • L. Liberti et al.

    Advanced treatment and disinfection for municipal wastewater reuse in agriculture

    Water Science and Technology

    (1999)
  • E.S. Melin et al.

    The effect of biofilter loading rate on the removal of organic by-products

    Water Research

    (2000)
  • Cited by (74)

    • Towards a generic solution to onsite wastewater treatment

      2023, Journal of Water Process Engineering
    • Development in electrochemical technology for environmental wastewater treatment

      2022, International Journal of Electrochemical Science
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text