Short-term competition between crop plants and soil microbes for inorganic N fertilizer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.019Get rights and content

Abstract

Agricultural systems that receive high amounts of inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilizer in the form of either ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3) or a combination thereof are expected to differ in soil N transformation rates and fates of NH4+ and NO3. Using 15N tracer techniques this study examines how crop plants and soil microbes vary in their ability to take up and compete for fertilizer N on a short time scale (hours to days). Single plants of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Morex) were grown on two agricultural soils in microcosms which received either NH4+, NO3 or NH4NO3. Within each fertilizer treatment traces of 15NH4+ and 15NO3 were added separately. During 8 days of fertilization the fate of fertilizer 15N into plants, microbial biomass and inorganic soil N pools as well as changes in gross N transformation rates were investigated. One week after fertilization 45–80% of initially applied 15N was recovered in crop plants compared to only 1–10% in soil microbes, proving that plants were the strongest competitors for fertilizer N. In terms of N uptake soil microbes out-competed plants only during the first 4 h of N application independent of soil and fertilizer N form. Within one day microbial N uptake declined substantially, probably due to carbon limitation. In both soils, plants and soil microbes took up more NO3 than NH4+ independent of initially applied N form. Surprisingly, no inhibitory effect of NH4+ on the uptake and assimilation of nitrate in both, plants and microbes, was observed, probably because fast nitrification rates led to a swift depletion of the ammonium pool. Compared to plant and microbial NH4+ uptake rates, gross nitrification rates were 3–75-fold higher, indicating that nitrifiers were the strongest competitors for NH4+ in both soils. The rapid conversion of NH4+ to NO3 and preferential use of NO3 by soil microbes suggest that in agricultural systems with high inorganic N fertilizer inputs the soil microbial community could adapt to high concentrations of NO3 and shift towards enhanced reliance on NO3 for their N supply.

Introduction

Intensive agricultural crop production in central Europe largely depends on the input of nitrogen fertilizers, mainly provided in the form of NH4+ or NO3 or a combination thereof. Global estimates indicate that less than ∼50% of the applied fertilizer N are used by the crop, while 2–5% are stored in the soil, ∼25% are emitted to the atmosphere and ∼20% are discharged to aquatic systems (Galloway et al., 2004). In the last decade a wealth of studies have focused on ways to improve fertilizer use efficiency, largely in cereal grain production, and on reducing adverse effects, namely losses of fertilizer N to the environment (Tilman et al., 2002, Mosier et al., 2004). Other studies have focused on fates of N inputs during one or more growing seasons, or on predicting N availability to crops (Jackson et al., 2008).

In agricultural soils plant available N is present in soluble inorganic (NO3, NH4+, NO2) and organic N forms. The pool of soluble organic N in unfertilized arable soils can be as large as the mineral N pool and might be strongly involved in mineralization and immobilization processes (reviewed by Murphy et al., 2000). Although dissolved organic N, especially free amino acids, may contribute significantly to plant nutrition in several ecosystems (reviewed by Näsholm et al., 2009), the quantitative importance seems to be negligible (<1%) in agricultural systems that receive high quantities of inorganic N fertilizer (Xu et al., 2008). This indicates that the plant N relations in agricultural soils are predominantly influenced by the rate of mineral N fertilizer application. But not only the amount, also the form of mineral N applied (i.e. NO3 vs. NH4+ vs. NH4NO3) is strongly affecting plant and microbial N metabolism.

In many cultivated soils it has been observed that in plants and microbes NH4+ assimilation exceeds NO3 assimilation (e.g. Azam et al., 1993), which was explained by higher energy costs associated with biological NO3 assimilation (Gutschick, 1981, Smirnoff and Stewart, 1985, Puri and Ashman, 1999). Moreover, it was shown that the presence of NH4+ inhibits NO3 uptake by fungi (Wang et al., 2007) and by plants (Gessler et al., 1998, Gazzarrini et al., 1999, Siddiqi et al., 2002), further promoting plant NH4+ uptake. However, in contrast to these molecular studies, other studies using soils showed in this environment that NH4+ utilization by soil microbes and plants was lower or similar to NO3 utilization (Burger and Jackson, 2003, Song et al., 2007), presumably due to higher mobility of NO3 in soils as compared to NH4+ (Hodge et al., 2000).

One factor leading to these differences in inorganic N assimilation might be that the inorganic N pools in agricultural soils are extremely dynamic (e.g. Jackson et al., 1989), caused by high microbial activities and fertilizer application. Although these dynamics are well established, little is still known about the mechanisms and short-term effects (hours to days) of different ratios of NH4+:NO3 on microbial N transformation processes. As some of these processes lead to N losses to the environment (e.g. leaching of NO3 or N gas emissions caused by nitrification or denitrification), even short-term increases in microbial activity can negatively affect the fertilizer use efficiency of crop plants.

Besides the availability of inorganic N, competition with soil microbes is one of the most critical factors affecting the ability of plants to acquire N from soil (Kaye and Hart, 1997). In several short-term 15N tracer studies (up to several days) investigating grassland ecosystems, microbes often assimilated more 15N-labelled inorganic N than plants did, but after an initially rapid N capture, microbial biomass appeared to reach a steady state, probably because of insufficient available C to maintain the fast initial growth rates (Hodge et al., 2000, Harrison et al., 2008). The same studies showed that during the following period, microbial 15N was gradually released by microbial decay and remineralization into the soil, eventually becoming available for plant root uptake. After longer time periods (weeks to months), plants contained an increasing proportion of the added 15N, showing that plants indeed utilized this N resource (Harrison et al., 2007). In other words, the turnover rate of plant biomass was much slower than that of microbes, which allowed plants to compete for the same N for extended periods, therefore enhancing plant competitiveness for N.

However, in high N ecosystems, like in agricultural soils, it was suggested that competition could be less severe (Schimel and Bennett, 2004), though plants and microbes are considered to compete for any available N, particularly for NH4+ and NO3. Further, besides competition between plants and soil microbes, competition among different groups of soil microbes for fertilizer N is of considerable importance. Burger and Jackson (2003) found that, due to the high availability of inorganic N after fertilization, competition between plants and heterotrophic microbes for NH4+ markedly decreased and nitrification became the major fate of NH4+. Over time, the N economy in well-aerated agricultural soils therefore becomes progressively NO3 dominated and plants cover their N-demand from mainly NO3 (Schimel and Bennett, 2004). However, it still remains unclear to which degree short-term (hours to days) competition for fertilizer N between plants, heterotrophic and autotrophic microbes is affected by the form and amount of mineral N applied.

The main objectives of the present study therefore were to assess (1) the effect of applied inorganic N form on the degree of competition for fertilizer N between crop plants and soil microbes, (2) the population response of bacteria and fungi to the different N treatments, as determined by estimation of gene copy numbers (quantitative PCR), (3) preferences in uptake of NH4+ or NO3 by plant roots and soil microbes as well as possible inhibitory effects of one N form on uptake of the other form and (4) fertilizer induced changes of microbially mediated N transformation rates that control N distribution to the different soil compartments as well as losses of fertilizer N to the environment.

Section snippets

Soil sampling and experimental setup

Soil was collected in April 2006 from two sites in the vicinity of Vienna, Austria, namely from Purkersdorf and Niederschleinz. Soils from both sites are widely distributed and are frequently used for barley cultivation in this area. A detailed summary of site characteristics and soil properties is given in Table 1. Soil samples (each ∼25 kg) were collected from 0 to 20 cm depth from both sites and immediately stored at 4 °C until further analysis. Prior to the start of the experiments soils

Plant and microbial biomass and microbial community composition

Plant biomass significantly increased during 8 d in both soils in all fertilizer treatments (Fig. 1). During the first 2 d after N fertilization, however, there was no significant difference in plant biomass between applied N forms and between soils (one-way ANOVA, P > 0.05). After 3 d plant biomass was significantly lower in both soils in the NH4Cl treatment compared to NH4NO3 and KNO3 as N source. This difference became stronger until the end of the experimental period and at the last

Fertilizer N uptake by plants and soil microbes

A major goal of the present study was to assess the intensity of competition for inorganic N between barley plants and soil microbes in two agricultural soils, and its dependence on the form of applied fertilizer N. We found that 8 d after N application crop plants were the major sink for inorganic fertilizer N in both soils. At this time 45–80% of initially applied 15N fertilizer was recovered in the plants compared to only 1–10% recovered in soil microbial biomass, proving that plants were

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Project LS-05-36 by Vienna Science and Technology Fund WWTF to a project consortium headed by PIs JS, WW and SZ. The authors thank Dr. Konrad Fiedler for statistical advice and one anonymous reviewer for valuable comments to improve the manuscript.

References (66)

  • D.V. Murphy et al.

    Gross nitrogen fluxes in soil: theory, measurement and application of N-15 pool dilution techniques

    Advances in Agronomy

    (2003)
  • D.D. Myrold et al.

    Potential importance of bacteria and fungi in nitrate assimilation in soil

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2007)
  • G.W. Nicol et al.

    Ammonia-oxidising Crenarchaeota: important players in the nitrogen cylce?

    Trends in Microbiology

    (2006)
  • G. Puri et al.

    Microbial immobilization of N-15-labelled ammonium and nitrate in a temperate woodland soil

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (1999)
  • C.W. Rice et al.

    Regulation of nitrate assimilation by ammonium in soils and in isolated soil-microbes

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1989)
  • K.H. Söderberg et al.

    The influence of nitrogen fertilisation on bacterial activity in the rhizosphere of barley

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2004)
  • P. Sorensen et al.

    Sequential diffusion of ammonium and nitrate from soil extracts to a polytetrafluoroethylene trap for N-15 determination

    Analytica Chimica Acta

    (1991)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Community composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea in rice field soil as affected by nitrogen fertilization

    Sytematic and Applied Microbiology

    (2009)
  • W.W. Wessel et al.

    Calculating gross N transformation rates of N-15 pool dilution experiments with acid forest litter: analytical and numerical approaches

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (1992)
  • F. Azam et al.

    Immobilization of ammonium and nitrate and their interaction with native N in 3 Illinois mollisols

    Biology and Fertility of Soils

    (1993)
  • P. Bengtson et al.

    Spatial distributions of plants and gross N transformation rates in a forest soil

    Journal of Ecology

    (2006)
  • H. Berger et al.

    Dissecting individual steps of nitrogen transcription factor cooperation in the Aspergillus nidulans nitrate cluster

    Molecular Microbiology

    (2008)
  • A.J. Bloom

    Wild and cultivated barleys show similar affinities for mineral nitrogen

    Oecologia

    (1985)
  • M. Burger et al.

    Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems

    Soil Biology and Biochemistry

    (2003)
  • K.E. Clemmensen et al.

    Site-dependent N uptake from N-form mixtures by arctic plants, soil microbes and ectomycorrhizal fungi

    Oecologia

    (2008)
  • A. Doyle et al.

    Persulfate digestion and simultaneous colorimetric analysis of carbon and nitrogen in soil extracts

    Soil Science Society of America Journal

    (2004)
  • C.A. Francis et al.

    Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2005)
  • J.N. Galloway et al.

    Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future

    Biogeochemistry

    (2004)
  • S. Gazzarrini et al.

    Three functional transporters for constitutive, diurnally regulated, and starvation-induced uptake of ammonium into arabidopsis roots

    Plant Cell

    (1999)
  • A. Gessler et al.

    Field and laboratory experiments on net uptake of nitrate and ammonium by the roots of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees

    New Phytologist

    (1998)
  • V.P. Gutschick

    Evolved strategies in nitrogen acquisition by plants

    American Naturalist

    (1981)
  • K.A. Harrison et al.

    Preferences for different nitrogen forms by coexisting plant species and soil microbes

    Ecology

    (2007)
  • E. Inselsbacher et al.

    A cost-effective high-throughput microcosm system for studying nitrogen dynamics at the plant–microbe–soil interface

    Plant and Soil

    (2009)
  • Cited by (171)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text