Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Psychiatric distress in animals versus animal models of psychiatric distress

Nature Neuroscience volume 19, pages 1387–1389 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The realm of human uniqueness steadily shrinks; reflecting this, other primates suffer from states closer to depression or anxiety than 'depressive-like' or 'anxiety-like behavior'. Nonetheless, there remain psychiatric domains unique to humans. Appreciating these continuities and discontinuities must inform the choice of neurobiological approach used in studying any animal model of psychiatric disorders. More fundamentally, the continuities reveal how aspects of psychiatric malaise run deeper than our species' history.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Affective experiences on a continuum with humans; subjects are olive baboons (Papio anubis) living in the Serengeti ecosystem of East Africa.

References

  1. Shumaker, R.W., Walkup, K.R. & Beck, B.B. Animal Tool Behavior, the Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals. (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wrangham, R.W. & Glowacki, L. Hum. Nat. 23, 5–29 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brosnan, S.F. & de Waal, F.B.M. Science 346, 314–319 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steiner, A.P. & Redish, A.D. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 995–1002 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rygula, R., Pluta, H. & Popik, P. PLoS One 7, e51959 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Langford, D.J. et al. Science 312, 1967–1970 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin, L.J. et al. Curr. Biol. 25, 326–332 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Decety, J. & Mason, P. Science 334, 1427–1430 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burkett, J.P. et al. Science 351, 375–378 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Panksepp, J. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1791–1804 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Engh, A.L. et al. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273, 707–712 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugiyama, Y. et al. Anthropol. Sci. 117, 113–119 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fashing, P.J. et al. Am. J. Primatol. 73, 405–409 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Biro, D. et al. Curr. Biol. 20, 351–352 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodall, J. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. (Harvard University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lesch, K.P. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 251–280 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sapolsky, R.M. & Share, L.J. PLoS Biol. 2, E106–E113 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sapolsky, R. & Ray, J. Am. J. Primatol. 8, l–13 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Letham, J. Motherless Brooklyn. (Vintage, N.Y., 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Skinner, B.F. Science and Human Behavior. (Simon & Schuster, NY, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Robert M. Sapolsky is in the Departments of Biological Sciences, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA and the Institute of Primate Research, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.,

    Robert M Sapolsky

Authors
  1. Robert M Sapolsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M Sapolsky.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sapolsky, R. Psychiatric distress in animals versus animal models of psychiatric distress. Nat Neurosci 19, 1387–1389 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4397

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4397

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene