Elsevier

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Volume 105, February 2018, Pages 125-131
Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Socioeconomic factors in coronary artery disease – Results from the SPIRR-CAD study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.12.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • German speaking CAD-patients have social gradients in coronary risk as Anglo-Saxon- and Scandinavian patients

  • Among standard coronary risk factors only smoking was higher in low social class

  • In contrast the scores of depression, coping and self efficacy measures were statistically significantly socially graded

  • Social gradients in emotional factors are stronger and more consistent than social gradients in standard risk factors.

  • SES is important and has consequences for which kind of preventive measures should be used.

Abstract

Low socio-economic status (SES) has been associated with an increased coronary risk in Western countries. All stress experiences are more pronounced in low SES patients with stress emanating from problems with family, job, or money.

The SPIRR-CAD study offered an excellent opportunity to examine these risk factors in German speaking mildly and medium depressed patients. In the SPIRR CAD study, a German multi centre randomized clinical trial of 450 male and 120 female coronary patients, we examined the standard and psychosocial risk factor profiles in relation to SES, as assessed by educational level. All differences in risk factors between low and high SES were in the inverse direction. Of standard risk factors, only smoking was socially graded and more common in low SES. Of psychosocial factors and emotions, exhaustion showed the strongest and most consistent inverse social gradient, but also anger, anxiety and depression were socially graded. The findings suggest that in German patients, as in other national groups, social gradients in CHD risk are considerable. They can be ascribed to both psychosocial and to standard risk factors. In the present two years follow-up, the prospective significance of psychological and social risk factors was analyzed showing that emotional factors played an important role, in that low and high SES patients differed in the expected direction. However, the differences were not statistically significant and therefore firm conclusions from follow up were not possible.

Trial registration: ISRCTN 76240576; NCT00705965

Introduction

Low socio-economic status is associated with an increased risk of coronary disease in Western countries [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The inverse socio-economic gradients found in the early White Hall studies in London were clear and convincing. Coronary heart disease was more frequent in low SES with a similar dose response gradient across all social strata [6]. Such gradients have been reconfirmed in many studies in various populations from the UK, the US, the Netherlands, and Scandinavian countries [7], [8], [9].

However, these gradients have been less intensively studied in German speaking countries. It has been pointed out that the proportion of students who graduate from secondary school and thereby are allowed to pursue academic studies is low within the German educational system. It has even been claimed that the difference between the very rich and the very poor is larger in Germany than anywhere else except the USA [11]. It has been argued that if it was possible to raise the general educational level of the entire population, one might also improve the coronary health status by providing education on a broader basis.

In this secondary analysis within a randomized controlled trial, the aim of our post hoc study was to examine the impact of social, clinical, and psychological factors regarding the social gradient in German CAD patients. The research questions were not pre-specified. They were based on previous experience [1].

Although it has been found that socio-economic characteristics were predictive of health events in Germany as described for other countries [11] little is known about the process that leads to the socio-economic differences and the mechanisms of the SES health gradients. To shed light on this issue we separately examined how standard risk factors, medical prognostic markers, and negative emotions are related to the social gradient in depressed CAD patients from a German multicentre trial.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

The SPIRR-CAD trial is a randomised, controlled, two-parallel-arm, superiority trial comparing a stepwise psychotherapy intervention with one individual information session complementing usual care [12], [13]. It was designed to evaluate the intervention on measures of depression. After 18 months depressive symptoms significantly decreased in both intervention and control groups.

Socio economic status

Social gradients were defined by means of educational characteristics (see Table 1). A total of 570 patients, 75 years or younger, were included of whom 120 were women (22%). Mean age differed significantly by SES: the very low SES patients were on average 58 years old, whereas subjects of the middle SES group was on average 58.8 years old, and the academics had an average age of 61 years (see Table 2 and Fig. 1).

Women (mean age 60.3 ± 8.6 years) were insignificantly older than men (mean age 58.9 ± 9.7 

Discussion

In this randomised controlled trial with mild and moderately depressed CAD patients we studied social gradients in emotional factors, in standard risk factors and in their impact within the two year medical follow-up period of the study group. These patterns can have consequences for the development of new preventive measures, which are discussed below.

Social gradients in psychological/emotional characteristics were considerable, whereas associations of standard coronary risk factors with SES

References (36)

  • S.P. Wamala et al.

    Potential explanations for the educational gradient in coronary heart disease: a population-based case-control study of Swedish women

    Am. J. Public Health

    (1999 Mar)
  • S.L. Syme

    Social class and cardiovascular disease

  • J. Lynch et al.

    Income inequality, the psychosocial environment, and health: comparisons of wealthy nations

    Lancet

    (2001 Jul 21)
  • P. Puska

    Community interventions in cardiovascular disease prevention

  • K. Orth-Gomér et al.

    Multiple stressors and coronary disease in women. The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study

    Biol. Psychol.

    (2005 Apr)
  • G. Rose et al.

    Social class and coronary heart disease

    Br. Heart J.

    (1981 Jan)
  • M.A. Winkleby et al.

    Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease

    Am. J. Public Health

    (1992 Jun)
  • M.A. Albert et al.

    Impact of traditional and novel risk factors on the relationship between socioeconomic status and incident cardiovascular events

    Circulation

    (2006)
  • D.A. Alter et al.

    Socioeconomic status, functional recovery, and long-term mortality among patients surviving acute myocardial infarction

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • N.K. Wenger

    Coronary heart disease in women: Evolution of our knowledge

  • T. Piketty

    Capital in the 21th Century

    (2014)
  • C. Albus et al.

    A stepwise psychotherapy intervention for reducing risk in coronary artery disease (SPIRR-CAD) - rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized trial in depressed patients with CAD

    J. Psychosom. Res.

    (2011)
  • C. Herrmann-Lingen et al.

    A Stepwise Psychotherapy Intervention for Reducing Risk in Coronary Artery Disease (SPIRR-CAD): Results of an Observer-Blinded, Multicenter, Randomized Trial in Depressed Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

    Psychosom. Med.

    (2016)
  • L.E. Hinkle et al.

    Occupation, education, and coronary heart disease. Risk is influenced more by education and background than by occupational experiences, in the Bell System

    Science

    (1968 Jul 19)
  • J. Stamler

    The prevention and control of epidemic coronary heart disease: scientific foundations and strategic approaches

    Int. J. Cardiol.

    (1983 Sep)
  • C. Herrmann

    International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - a review of validation data and clinical results

    J. Psychosom. Res.

    (1997)
  • M. Hamilton

    Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness

    Brit J. Soc. Clin. Psychol.

    (1967)
  • H.U. Wittchen et al.

    Strukturiertes klinisches Interview für DSM-IV (SKID I und SKID-II)

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text