Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volumes 605–606, 15 December 2017, Pages 598-609
Science of The Total Environment

Development and application of a novel method for regional assessment of groundwater contamination risk in the Songhua River Basin

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.126Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Integrate numerical modelling, public datasets and web mapping services into a groundwater risk assessment framework

  • Evaluate various types of hazards from point and diffusive sources in a unified form

  • Assess groundwater risk by index-overlay of groundwater vulnerability and hazard

  • Generate maps for groundwater risk maps for the entire Songhua River Basin

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to quantify the groundwater contamination risk of Songhua River Basin by applying a novel approach of integrating public datasets, web services and numerical modelling techniques. To our knowledge, this study is the first to establish groundwater risk maps for the entire Songhua River Basin, one of the largest and most contamination-endangered river basins in China.

Index-based groundwater risk maps were created with GIS tools at a spatial resolution of 30 arc sec by combining the results of groundwater vulnerability and hazard assessment. Groundwater vulnerability was evaluated using the DRASTIC index method based on public datasets at the highest available resolution in combination with numerical groundwater modelling. As a novel approach to overcome data scarcity at large scales, a web mapping service based data query was applied to obtain an inventory for potential hazardous sites within the basin.

The groundwater risk assessment demonstrated that < 1% of Songhua River Basin is at high or very high contamination risk. These areas were mainly located in the vast plain areas with hotspots particularly in the Changchun metropolitan area. Moreover, groundwater levels and pollution point sources were found to play a significantly larger impact in assessing these areas than originally assumed by the index scheme. Moderate contamination risk was assigned to 27% of the aquifers, predominantly associated with less densely populated agricultural areas. However, the majority of aquifer area in the sparsely populated mountain ranges displayed low groundwater contamination risk.

Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that this novel method is valid for regional assessments of groundwater contamination risk. Despite limitations in resolution and input data consistency, the obtained groundwater contamination risk maps will be beneficial for regional and local decision-making processes with regard to groundwater protection measures, particularly if other data availability is limited.

Introduction

Since the 1950s, major advances in drilling technology and hydrogeological knowledge had facilitated a massive expansion in groundwater use across the developing world in order to satisfy the needs of irrigation, domestic purposes and industrial demand (Foster and Chilton, 2003). In China alone, > 500 large cities rely on groundwater resource for their drinking water supply (Van der Gun, 2012). These excessive exploitation and inappropriate activities at the land surface lead to and foster degradation of groundwater resources in many areas (Jiang, 2009). Moreover, remediation of contaminated aquifers is cost intensive and time consuming and may not reach remedial objectives due to large storage, physical inaccessibility and retardation of contaminants (Travis and Doty, 1990). In this context, groundwater contamination risk assessment provides a useful tool to design and implement groundwater protection measures to prevent or reduce groundwater contamination (Zaporozec et al., 2002).

In a risk assessment, where risk is defined as hazard plus vulnerability, the combined rating of the potential harmfulness posed by a pollution source (hazard assessment) and the possibility of the spreading into and within the groundwater (vulnerability assessment) could be interpreted as the probability for groundwater contamination, both in quantitative or qualitative terms depending on the used method (Johansson, 1999, Varnes, 1984). Regarding the groundwater vulnerability assessment, existing methods are classified into three categories: Index methods, statistical methods (Erwin and Tesoriero, 1997, Li et al., 2015) and process-based methods (Sinkevich et al., 2005, Milnes, 2011). An overview about available methods is given by Zaporozec et al. (2002). Index methods, such as DRASTIC (Aller et al., 1987) or GOD (Foster, 1987), which focus on the key factors controlling the solute transport processes, are the most commonly used procedures for vulnerability mapping. They are relatively inexpensive, straightforward, adaptable on site-specific conditions (e.g. Guo et al., 2007, Lin et al., 2016), have a minimum demand of data and produce an end product embeddable into decision-making processes (Focazio et al., 2002). In consequence, index based methods such as DRASTIC were applied to evaluate groundwater vulnerability for basins with very diverse conditions in many regions of the world such as Europe (e.g. Albuquerque et al., 2013, Panagopoulos et al., 2006), the Middle East (e.g. Jamrah et al., 2008, Awawdeh and Jaradat, 2010), Nepal (Shrestha et al., 2017) and China (e.g. Huan et al., 2012, Wang et al., 2012, Ye et al., 2015).

However, the potential of standardized index methods based on a few key factors to predict groundwater vulnerability is questioned among researchers (Rupert, 2001). Gogu and Dassargues (2000) therefore emphasized the need to integrate process-based methods such as numerical models into widely used index methods to take into account the physical processes of water movement and the associated fate and transport of contaminants in the environment. There have been a very limited number of studies to quantify intrinsic vulnerability by including numerical modelling (Yu et al., 2010, Sophocleous and Ma, 1998, Connell and Van Den Daele, 2003). Process based methods need extensive field data, both for model setup and model calibration (Butscher and Huggenberger, 2008). Especially for the assessment of larger catchments, such data and information are scarce and unequally distributed (Ireson et al., 2006, Wu et al., 2011). Furthermore, a considerable amount of computational power is required to simulate process-based methods at larger scales, particularly if chemical and biological processes and unsaturated zone mechanisms are included in the simulation (Anane et al., 2013).

For a detailed assessment of potential hazards, information about the pollution sources and the characteristic of the pollutants should be taken under investigation. The difficulties in obtaining this specific data lead to the preference of an index based assessment system for hazards (Wang et al., 2012). An approach often applied for smaller catchments is to set up an inventory of potential hazard sources in combination with weighting and rating schemes (e.g. Kuisi et al., 2014, Aliewi and Al-Khatib, 2015). Alternatively, several previous studies used grid based data such as land cover or land use as a proxy parameter for describing potential anthropogenic pollution hazard from diffusive and point sources (Bartzas et al., 2015). The obtained data is either included in a modified groundwater vulnerability assessment (Gomezdelcampo and Dickerson, 2008, Fritch et al., 2000) or in a separate index based hazard assessment (Panagopoulos et al., 2006, Saidi et al., 2009).

The present study is concerned with the assessment of groundwater vulnerability, groundwater hazard and the resulting groundwater risk for Songhua River Basin, a large scale catchment providing water resources for more than 62 million people in North-East China (Yuhong et al., 2010). Although Songhua River Basin was one of the earliest urbanized centers in China since the 1950s, a series of developmental strategies by the government calling for a “revitalization of the Northeast's old industrial base” brought in new economic development and promoted rapid urbanization (Zhang, 2008). However, urbanization and industrialization adversely affected the surrounding ecosystems and environment (Fu et al., 2016). One of the environmental issues of aquifers in the study area is an increased pollution of the aquifer system by Nitrate from fertilizer overuse (e.g. Zhang et al., 1996, Gu et al., 2013). As North-East China is the old industrial heartland of China, discharges and leakages from industrial sources and brownfields put an additional potential pressure on groundwater resources (Nixdorf et al., 2015). Hence, assessing the groundwater environmental risk in the region is very necessary.

In view of the aforementioned limitations, we chose a combined approach using public datasets and web services, remote sensing as well as numerical groundwater flow modelling to generate input data for an index method based assessment of aquifer vulnerability, hazard and risk. Particularly the embedding of both a simplified 2D groundwater flow model and web-query data in the index based assessment methods aims to improve dealing with aforementioned problems of scarce field data on larger scales.

In this context the main objectives of this study are: Firstly, to develop a methodology to combine web-query data from web mapping services, numerical groundwater modelling and public datasets into a GIS-based groundwater risk assessment framework, secondly to apply the method to provide maps of groundwater vulnerability, groundwater hazard potential and groundwater contamination in the entire Songhua River Basin at the highest resolution available and thirdly, to identify the importance and interrelation of input parameters and obtained maps using sensitivity analysis methods.

Section snippets

Study area description

The Songhua River Basin is located in the northeastern region of China (119°52′ –132°31′ E and 41°42′–51°38′ N) and covers an area of > 550,000 km2 (Fig. 1). Its water drains to Songhua River, which is with a length of > 2300 km the largest tributary of Amur River. Songhua River main tributaries are Nen River, which drains the Northern part of the basin and Second Songhua River coming from Jilin province in the Southern part of the catchment. The basin covers vast areas of the three Chinese

Groundwater risk assessment index method

The idea of an index based risk assessment is to find a quantitative way of expressing the likelihood that an aquifer be polluted by contaminants, which are introduced into the ground surface. This is determined by two groups of indicators (Fig. 2): Firstly by the aquifer's intrinsic vulnerability, which describes the ease with which a contaminant introduced to the subsurface can reach and diffuse the groundwater (Liggett and Talwar, 2009) and secondly by the hazard which is defined as a

Vulnerability and hazard parameter maps

In Songhua River Basin, modelled stationary depth to water ranged between a few meters and > 50 m covering the entire range of DRASTIC indices (Fig. 5a). The groundwater model results showed that a shallow, more vulnerable, groundwater system prevailed mainly in regions with low altitudes such as in the area of Songnen and Sanjiang plain as well was along the main rivers draining the catchment. Low recharge rates of < 50 mm per year were calculated for vast parts of the Songnen plain as well as the

Conclusions

This study provides a new method for assessing groundwater contamination risk on a large scale for the (upper) aquifers of Songhua River Basin. This was achieved by the integration of intrinsic vulnerability assessment using the DRASTIC model and an assessment of potential point and diffusive hazards in order to calculate the contamination risk indices. A new approach was proposed which combines public datasets, web service databases and groundwater flow modelling to derive the input datasets

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Qiang Wang from the Heilongjiang Research Institute of Environmental Science for data support. This work is part of the H2O SUSTAIN project and financially supported by the EU-China Environmental Sustainability Programme of the European Union (EuropeAid/133582/L/ACT/CN).

References (85)

  • F.A.L. Pacheco et al.

    Factor weighting in DRASTIC modeling

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2015)
  • S. Shrestha et al.

    Evaluation of index-overlay methods for groundwater vulnerability and risk assessment in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Assessment of groundwater contamination risk using hazard quantification, a modified DRASTIC model and groundwater value, Beijing Plain, China

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2012)
  • C. Yu et al.

    Quantitative assessment of groundwater vulnerability using index system and transport simulation, Huangshuihe catchment, China

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2010)
  • W.L. Zhang et al.

    Nitrate pollution of groundwater in northern China

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (1996)
  • M.T.D. Albuquerque et al.

    Spatio-temporal groundwater vulnerability assessment - a coupled remote sensing and GIS approach for historical land cover reconstruction

    Water Resour. Manag.

    (2013)
  • L. Aller et al.

    A Standardized System to Evaluate Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings

    (1987)
  • M. Anane et al.

    GIS-based DRASTIC, Pesticide DRASTIC and the Susceptibility Index (SI): comparative study for evaluation of pollution potential in the Nabeul-Hammamet shallow aquifer, Tunisia

    Hydrogeol. J.

    (2013)
  • M.M. Awawdeh et al.

    Evaluation of aquifers vulnerability to contamination in the Yarmouk River basin, Jordan, based on DRASTIC method

    Arab. J. Geosci.

    (2010)
  • Baidu Inc., 2016a. 概述 Web服务API [WWW Document]. URL http://lbsyun.baidu.com/index.php?title=webapi (accessed...
  • Baidu Inc., 2016b. Place API Web服务API [WWW Document]. URL...
  • Baidu Inc., 2016c. Baidu Web API 常见问题 [WWW Document]. URL http://developer.baidu.com/map/question.htm (accessed...
  • C. Butscher et al.

    Intrinsic vulnerability assessment in karst areas: a numerical modeling approach

    Water Resour. Res.

    (2008)
  • J. Doherty

    Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Complex Environmental Models

    (2015)
  • P.A. Domenico et al.

    Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology

    (1998)
  • M.L. Erwin et al.

    Predicting ground-water vulnerability to nitrate in the Puget Sound Basin

    USGS Factsheet

    (1997)
  • B. Feng et al.

    Groundwater level forecast and prediction of Songnen Plain in Jilin Province

    Phys. Numer. Simul. Geotech. Eng.

    (2014)
  • M. Focazio et al.

    Assessing ground-water vulnerability to contamination: providing scientifically defensible information for decision makers

    USGS Circ.

    (2002)
  • S.S.D. Foster

    Fundamental concepts in aquifer vulnerability, pollution risk and protection strategy

    Vulnerability soil Groundw. to Pollut.

    (1987)
  • S.S.D. Foster et al.

    Groundwater: the processes and global significance of aquifer degradation

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.

    (2003)
  • T.G. Fritch et al.

    A predictive modeling approach to assessing the groundwater pollution susceptibility of the paluxy aquifer, central texas using a geographic information system

    Environ. Geol.

    (2000)
  • X. Fu et al.

    Analysis of urbanization based on center-of-gravity movement and characteristics in Songhua River basin of China and its southern source sub-basin between 1990 and 2010

    Chin. Geogr. Sci.

    (2016)
  • R. Gogu et al.

    Current trends and future challenges n groundwater vulnerability assessment using overlay and index methods

    Environ. Geol.

    (2000)
  • E. Gomezdelcampo et al.

    A modified DRASTIC model for siting Confined Animal Feeding Operations in Williams County, Ohio, USA

    Environ. Geol.

    (2008)
  • Q. Guo et al.

    A new model (DRARCH) for assessing groundwater vulnerability to arsenic contamination at basin scale: a case study in Taiyuan basin, northern China

    Environ. Geol.

    (2007)
  • J. Hartmann et al.

    The new global lithological map database GLiM: a representation of rock properties at the Earth surface

    Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.

    (2012)
  • R.C. Heath

    Basic ground-water hydrology

  • Heilongjiang Statistical Bureau

    Heilongjiang Statistical Yearbook. Beijing

    (2011–2016)
  • R.J. Hijmans et al.

    Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas

    Int. J. Climatol.

    (2005)
  • Inner Mongolia Statistical Bureau

    Inner Mongolia Statistical Yearbook. Beijing

    (2011–2015)
  • A. Ireson et al.

    Water resources modelling under data scarcity: coupling MIKE BASIN and ASM groundwater model

    Water Resour. Manag.

    (2006)
  • A. Jamrah et al.

    Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the coastal region of Oman using DRASTIC index method in GIS environment

    Environ. Monit. Assess.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Investigating groundwater vulnerability variation under future abstraction scenarios to estimate optimal pumping reduction rates

      2021, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      To achieve this, a dynamic and time-dependent modeling approach for groundwater vulnerability assessment that includes the linkage between a GIS-based DRASTIC model and a transient groundwater flow model was developed. In general, the coupling between a vulnerability assessment model and a flow model has been applied in previous studies as well (e.g. Almarsi, 2008; Ghouili et al., 2021; Luoma et al., 2017; Nixdorf et al., 2017; Voutchkova et al., 2021; Witkowski et al., 2003); in these studies, either a steady state or a transient flow model was developed in order to quantify the depth-to-water (D) parameter for improving the vulnerability model. However, no study so far has performed the coupling between the vulnerability and the flow models in order to investigate the relationship between a specific characteristic of a groundwater system related to groundwater quality, i.e. groundwater vulnerability, and a crucial anthropogenic factor associated with groundwater quantity, i.e. groundwater withdrawals.

    • ANFIS-MOA models for the assessment of groundwater contamination vulnerability in a nitrate contaminated area

      2021, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Elçi (2017) utilized a generalized reduced gradient (GRG) optimization to calibrate groundwater contamination vulnerability to nitrate. Nixdorf et al. (2017) combined a numerical groundwater modeling with DRASTIC method to quantify the groundwater contamination vulnerability to nitrate. Asadi et al. (2017) used a fuzzy linear regression-GA model to avoid the subjectivity of DRASTIC model for groundwater contamination vulnerability mapping.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text