Planetary protection for human exploration of Mars
Introduction
When searching for life beyond Earth, the unique capabilities of human astronauts can be utilized effectively only if biological contamination associated with human presence is understood and controlled. Regulating biological contamination during planetary exploration is termed planetary protection, and will be a critical element in the human exploration of other solar system bodies. Planetary protection must be incorporated from the earliest stages of mission planning and development, to ensure proper implementation. Issues of concern to planetary protection involve both “forward contamination”, which is the contamination of other solar system bodies by Earth microbes and organic materials, and “backward contamination”, which is the contamination of Earth systems by potential alien life. Forward contamination involves contamination that might invalidate current or future scientific exploration of a particular solar system body, and that might disrupt the planetary environment or a potential endogenous (alien) ecosystem. Backward contamination involves the potential for harmful contamination of the Earth, and for human missions includes the possible immediate and long-term effects on the health of the astronaut explorers from possible biologically-active materials encountered during exploration.
A number of national and international workshops held over the last six years [1], [2], [3], [4] have generated a consensus regarding planetary protection policies and requirements for human missions to Mars, and a 2007 workshop held by NASA has considered the issues and benefits to planetary protection that might be offered by a return to the Moon [5]. Conclusions from these workshops recognize that some degree of forward contamination associated with human astronaut explorers is inevitable. Nevertheless, the principles and policies of planetary protection, developed by the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) in accordance with the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, can and should be followed when humans are exploring space.
Implementation guidelines include documenting and minimizing contamination of the exploration targets, protection at the most stringent levels for any target locations in which Earth life might grow, protection of humans from exposure to untested planetary materials, and preventing harmful contamination of the Earth as the highest priority of all missions. These principles should be incorporated in frameworks for future international missions of human exploration. It would be a tragic medical accident were an astronaut on the way to Mars get sick of unknown causes. It would be far more tragic, and of significant concern for planetary protection, should one of several astronauts become ill on the return from Mars to Earth, without sufficient medical information to determine why.
Section snippets
International basis for planetary protection policy
Planetary protection entered into international law with Article IX of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which states in part that:
“…parties to the Treaty shall pursue studies of outer space including the Moon and other celestial bodies, and conduct exp loration of them so as to avoid their harmful contamination and also adverse changes in the environment of the Earth resulting from the introduction of extraterrestrial matter and, where necessary, shall adopt appropriate measures for this purpose…”
COSPAR policy on human missions
The introduction to the COSPAR policy on planetary protection recognizes that the primary goals of planetary protection, protecting the Earth and preventing forward and backward contamination, do not change when humans are involved. However, the essential association of humans with commensal microbes requires that certain variations will have to be developed in order to implement planetary protection on human missions. To mitigate the potential for danger to astronauts and to Earth, planetary
Implementation guidelines
In addition to general principles on human exploration, COSPAR has formulated a number of guidelines that can be used to inform the development of mission scenarios.
Guidelines for human missions to mars: In accordance with these principles, specific implementation guidelines for human missions to Mars include:
- •
Human missions will carry microbial populations that will vary in both kind and quantity, and it will not be practicable to specify all aspects of an allowable microbial population or
Practical implementation
It appears premature to adopt specific requirements for human missions to Mars, but (as of July 2008) COSPAR has assembled a set of guidelines as part of, and consistent with, its consensus planetary protection policy. Locations on Mars that are consistent with current mission requirements to land on most of Mars (category IVa) are locations that likely would be allowed for human exploration, as being too cold, and too dry, for surface microbial contamination—given that EVA suits and other
Conclusions
The movement of humans off-planet is one of the hopes for sustaining our civilization and our species. Preserving that value of that movement in terms of exploration and science is an important component of human spaceflight. Planetary protection considerations are essential to protecting the Earth, and protecting the potential to perform scientific exploration of the solar system without jeopardizing investigations into the origins and evolution of life. Although humans are inevitably
References (9)
- et al.
Participants of the NASA/ESA planetary protection Workshop. Planetary protection and humans on Mars, NASA/ESA workshop results
Adv. Space Res.
(2008) - M.E. Criswell, M.S. Race, J.D. Rummel, A. Baker (Eds.), Planetary protection issues in the human exploration of Mars,...
- J.A. Hogan, J.W. Fisher, M.S. Race, J. Joshi, J.D. Rummel (Eds.), Life Support & Habitation and Planetary Protection...
- Joint NASA/ESA Workshop on Mars Planetary Protection and Human Systems Research and Technology, The European Space...
Cited by (15)
Moving to Mars: The Feasibility and Desirability of Mars Settlements
2023, Space PolicyEquipping an extraterrestrial laboratory: Overview of open research questions and recommended instrumentation for the Moon
2021, Advances in Space ResearchCitation Excerpt :In order to ensure compliance to those rules within missions that may not make astrobiology an absolute priority, those rules should be highly pragmatic and evidence-based. Guidelines have been proposed (e.g., Conley and Rummel, 2010; COSPAR, 2020) but specific requirements, technologies and operations remain to be defined. The Moon would be an interesting testing ground.
Planetary Protection and the astrobiological exploration of Mars: Proactive steps in moving forward
2019, Advances in Space ResearchCitation Excerpt :Given NASA’s (and other agencies as well as the private sector) hope to send human missions to Mars in the 2030s or even earlier, current planetary protection guidelines applied to today’s unmanned robots are impractical: humans would inevitably bring microbial hitchhikers with them very soon, because we cannot conduct a bioburden reduction process on humans. A high degree of forward contamination associated with human astronaut explorers will be inevitable (Conley and Rummel, 2010), as it will be impossible for all human-associated processes and operations to be conducted within entirely closed systems (Rummel et al., 2014). No matter what strategy we choose to follow, the instant we have humans in an area on Mars we have a less clean state of that area.
Planetary protection issues of private endeavours in research, exploration, and human access to space: An environmental economics approach to forward contamination
2019, Advances in Space ResearchCitation Excerpt :This will not hold true in the case of a commercial NewSpace mission: a private space actor would have to face the whole budget overhead. Although in the case of unmanned spacecrafts this overhead may be a small percentage of the total mission cost, the microbial reduction of commercial manned systems is expected to require novel methods (Conley & Rummel, 2010) that may lead to sharp expenditure increases. Consequently, the minimization of the planetary protection costs of space missions which are internal to the core business of private space actors is expected to be a firm goal in the commercial space sector (Newman, 2015).
Does extraterrestrial life have intrinsic value? An exploration in responsibility ethics
2019, International Journal of AstrobiologyAn airlock concept to reduce contamination risks during the human exploration of Mars
2023, npj Microgravity