Sorption of arsenite and arsenate on ferrihydrite: Effect of organic and inorganic ligands
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Arsenic (As) is an element ubiquitous in the environment and is extremely toxic for humans, animals and plants [1], [2]. Arsenic contamination in water is a worldwide problem, because in drinking water it is rapidly and directly sorbed by humans [1], [3], [4], [5]. Developing countries are the most severely affected by the arsenic crisis, but the situation is especially alarming in south and southeast Asia [3], [6]. The seriousness of this problem has led the World Health Organization to describe it as the greatest mass poisoning in human history. An examined 35 million people in Bangladesh and 6 million in West Bengal are at risk [2], [5], [7].
In soils high concentrations of As can originate from different sources, as weathering of rocks or minerals with high As contents, biological activities and anthropogenic activities, such as mining smelter, disposal waste and application of As fertilizers and pesticides.
Many inorganic and organo-arsenical forms are present in natural environments, but the most common are arsenite [As(III)] and arsenate [As(V)]. The predominant As speciation is strongly influenced by the redox potential and pH [5], [7], [8]. Arsenite is 25–60 times more toxic and mobile than As(V), which mainly arise from its state as H3AsO3 at pH < 9.0, as compared to the charged species which predominate in a wide pH range (H2AsO4− between 2.5 and 7, HAsO42− between pH 7.0 and 12.0 [4], [5], [7], [8].
The mobility of As compounds in soil–water–plant systems is affected by sorption/desorption on/from soil components or coprecipitation with metal ions [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. The importance of oxides (mainly Fe-oxides) in controlling the mobility and concentration of As in natural environments is well known [4], [5], [8], [9], [12], [13], [14]. In particular, As(V) demonstrates a high affinity for most metal hydroxides and clay minerals, whereas As(III) has a strong preference for hydroxides of iron. At circumneutral pH values and higher, As(III) usually adsorbs to a greater extent on ferric hydroxides than As(V) [8], [15], [16].
Many studies on the structures of As(V) adsorption complexes on various Fe oxyhydroxides have been carried out using X-ray adsorption spectroscopy, whereas very few have been focused on As(III) [4], [5], [8], [13], [17], [18], [19]. The formation of various inner-sphere complexes has been suggested as the primary mechanism for the sorption of As(V) on iron oxides [13], [17]. However, both inner-sphere complexes and outer-sphere complexes have been found in the sorption of As(III) on different iron oxides [13], [19]. Ona-Nguema et al. [19] found using EXAFS spectroscopy that As(III) forms bidentate mononuclear edge-sharing and bidentate binuclear corner-sharing on ferrihydrite. A redox reaction between Fe(III)-oxide and As(III) did not occur within 72 h, indicating that the kinetics of the redox reaction between As(III) and Fe(III) is relatively slow [20].
As reported by Inskeep et al. [21] on iron oxides, the sorption capacity of As(III) compares or exceeds that of As(V), the former showing an adsorption envelope centered at pH 8.0, while the latter increases continuously with decreasing pH, but caution should be used in drawing conclusions regarding binding strength from the magnitude of retention.
Numerous studies have been carried out on the sorption of As(III) and As(V) onto Fe or Al oxides [4], [8], [9], [22]. The presence of inorganic and organic ligands affects the sorption of As onto soil minerals and soils by competing for available binding sites and/or reducing the surface charge of the sorbents [8], [10], [12], [23], [24], [25], [26]. The competition in sorption is affected by the affinity of the competing anions for the surfaces of the sorbents, the nature and surface properties of the minerals and soils, the surface coverage and the reaction time.
Competition between As(V) and phosphate has been widely studied [4], [7], [8], [10], [11], [12], [27], [28] but scant attention has been devoted to compare the effect of different inorganic and organic ligands on the adsorption of As(V) and As(III) onto soil components [24], [25], [29]. Low molecular mass organic ligands (particularly aliphatic acids, such as acetic, oxalic, tartaric, succinic, malic, and citric acids) are abundant in the rhizosphere, being continuously released by plant roots and microorganisms ([8], [30] and references there in). Their presence may affect the mobility of As at soil–root interface.
In order to have useful information on the factors which may influence the mobility and potential toxicity of arsenic in natural environments, we carried out a study on the sorption of As(IIII) and As(V) onto ferrihydrite as affected by pH, nature and concentration of organic [oxalic (OX), malic (MAL), tartaric (TAR), and citric (CIT) acid] and inorganic [phosphate (PO4), sulphate (SO4), selenate (SeO4) and selenite (SeO3)] ligands, surface coverage and the sequence of anion addition.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
All chemicals were reagent grade and used without further purification. Solutions were prepared with Mill-Q (18 MΩ-cm) water. Plastic volumetric flasks and reaction vessels (polypropylene) were cleaned with HNO3 1% and rinsed several times with deionized water before use.
Characterization of the metal oxide
The Fe oxide obtained at pH 5.5 was identified to be ferrihydrite. The X-ray pattern of this sample showed four characteristic broad peaks centered at 0.254, 0.225, 0.198, and 0.148 nm (Fig. 1A). The FT-IR spectrum and TEM indicated that this material was a very poorly crystallized material, with particles less than 100 nm in size, which appear usually aggregated (Fig. 1B and C). The sharp peak at 1384 cm−1 in the FT-IR spectrum (Fig. 1B) indicates presence of nitrate as impurity. Ferrihydrite
Conclusions
The data reported in this work evidence that the sorption of As(III) and As(V) onto ferrihydrite is affected by the nature and concentration of organic and inorganic anions, pH and sequence of addition of As and the competing ligand. The efficiency of the anions studied in preventing As sorption was as follow:
However, whereas PO4 efficiency increased by increasing pH, the efficiency of the other ligands increased by decreasing pH. Furthermore, in acidic
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Italian Research Program of National Interest (PRIN) for the financial support of the research (Grant number 2006073324). DiSSPAPA number 240.
References (38)
- et al.
Arsenic round the world: a review
Talanta
(2002) - et al.
A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters
Appl. Geochem.
(2002) - et al.
Arsenic in the soil environment: a review
Adv. Agron.
(1998) - et al.
Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modelling
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(2001) The mechanism of anion adsorption on iron oxides: evidence for the bonding of arsenate tetrahedra on free Fe(O, OH)6 edges
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta
(1995)- et al.
Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron hydroxide
Water Res.
(1982) Arsenic
Elements
(2006)- et al.
Arsenic contamination of graundwater and drinking water in Vietnam: a human health treath
Environ. Sci Technol.
(2001) Environmental Chemistry of Arsenic
(2002)- et al.
Arsenic calamity in the Indian subcontinent. What lessons have been learned?
Talanta
(2002)
Mobility of trace elements in soil environments
Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Competitive sorption of arsenate and phosphate on different clay minerals and soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
Coprecipitation of arsenate with metal oxides. 2. Nature, mineralogy, and reactivity of iron(III) precipitates
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Sorption and desorption of arsenic by soil minerals and soils in the presence of nutrients and organics
Competitive sorption of arsenate and arsenite on oxides and clay minerals
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals; implications for arsenic mobility
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Surface structures and stability of arsenic (III) on goethite. Spectroscopic evidence for inner-sphere complexes
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Arsenate and chromate retention mechanisms on goethite. 1. Surface structure
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Cited by (113)
The fate of Sb(V) and As(V) during the aging of ferrihydrite
2024, Chemical Engineering JournalOxidative compensation mechanism of Fe-S synergetic inhibition of Cd activity in paddy field during flooding and drainage
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentMechanism, behaviour and application of iron nitrate modified carbon nanotube composites for the adsorption of arsenic in aqueous solutions
2023, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering