Tumorsize dependent detection rate of endorectal MRI of prostate cancer—A histopathologic correlation with whole-mount sections in 70 patients with prostate cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the value of T2w endorectal MRI (eMRI) for correct detection of tumor foci within the prostate regarding tumor size.

Materials and Methods

70 patients with histologically proven prostate cancer were examined with T2w eMRI before radical prostatectomy at a 1.5 T scanner. For evaluation of eMRI, two radiologists evaluated each tumor focus within the gland. After radical prostatectomy, the prostates were prepared as whole-mount sections, according to transversal T2w eMRI. For each slice, tumor surroundings were marked and compared with eMRI. Based on whole-mount section, 315 slices were evaluated and 533 tumor lesions were documented.

Results

Based on the T2w eMRI, 213 tumor lesions were described. In 137/213, histology could prove these lesions. EMRI was able to visualize 0/56 lesions with a maximum size of <0.3 cm (detection rate 0%), between 0.3 and 0.5 cm 4/116 (3%), between 1 and 0.5 cm 22/169 (13%), between 2 and 1 cm 61/136 (45%) and for >2 cm 50/56 (89%). False positive eMRI findings were: <0.3 cm n = 0, 0.5–0.3 cm n = 12, 0.5–1 cm n = 34, 1–2 cm n = 28 and >2 cm n = 2.

Conclusion

T2w eMRI cannot exclude prostate cancer with lesions smaller 10 mm and 0.4 cm3 respectively. The detection rate for lesions more than 20 mm (1.6 cm3) is to be considered as high.

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men and according to the American Cancer Society the estimated new cases in the United States of America will be 192,280 men in 2009; the estimated deaths will be 27,360 [1]. The potential of MRI for imaging PCa was already recognized and evaluated in the beginning of the wide introduction of MRI into clinical practice in the early eighties [2]. Until today, the combination of T2 weighted turbo-spin-echo (T2w TSE) sequences and the application of an endorectal coil (eMRI) has to be considered as state-of-the-art for local tumor staging [3], [4], [5], in particular for high magnetic field strengths up to 3 T. At present the main indication for eMRI of the prostate in the clinical work-up is tumor staging for assignment of best therapy. But clinical demands changed during the last two decades. While PSA testing has significantly reduced the amount of advanced PCa (T4/T3; N+, M+ stages) at the time point of diagnosis, there has been also an increasing number of negative prostate biopsies [6]. Also the increased fraction of cancer with low-risk profiles (T1a-b tumors with a Gleason-scores of 5 and below in combination with a total PSA-level of <10 ng/ml) as well as clinical insignificant PCa in old men with unclear benefit from radical prostatectomy/radiotherapy introduced alternative therapy regimes, e.g. active surveillance or (focal) tumor ablation [5], [7]. MRI as method with excellent soft tissue contrast for detecting non-organ confined tumors is also a prerequisite for being a useful tool for biopsy-planning, either ultrasound- or MRI-guided [8], [9].

Additional information provided by metabolic (MR-spectroscopic imaging; MRS) and functional imaging (diffusion-weighted imaging; DWI and T1w dynamic-contrast media enhanced MRI; T1w DCE) for improving the diagnostic performance of MRI has been obtained in the meantime [10], [11]. However, it is still inevitable to use T2w TSE MRI as a robust, fast and as easily repeatable diagnostic modality.

Data about T2w TSE eMRI to identify suspicious lesions within the prostatic gland regarding exact tumor size are rare. Most of the published data do lack of exact match with histopathology (no whole-mount sections), were focussed on local tumor staging or evaluating new imaging techniques like DWI. Older studies focussed on low-filed MRI and/or low-resolution MRI. It is an important point for the further clinical development of (multimodal) MRI to evaluate the detection rate of state-of-the-art T2w TSE eMRI in special regards towards the upcoming requirements: detection and monitoring of suspicious lesions within the gland [5], [12].

Therefore, purpose of this study was to evaluate the detection rate of tumor foci of prostate cancer by T2w TSE eMRI at 1.5 T regarding tumor size.

Section snippets

Patients

In total, 70 patients with biopsy-proven PCa underwent eMRI before nerve sparing radical prostatectomy (RPx) in our university hospital. The patients were recruited consecutively based on our prospectively planned study design. All patients were informed in detail about the purpose and procedure of the examination. Conduction of eMRI, reporting and informed consent was according standard clinical procedures and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki [13]. Time interval between biopsy

Histopathology and whole-mount sections

Histopathology revealed an organ-defined (T2) stage in 60/70 patients (86%), in 5/70 a stage T3a (7%) and 5/70 a stage T3b (7%) was diagnosed; a stage T4 was not documented in our cohort. Based on the RPx specimens, median Gleason score was 6 (range 3–9), minor/major Gleason score was 2.9/3.0 ± 0.6/0.7 (median 3/3; range 1/2–4/5).

In total, 315 whole-mount sections were evaluated (mean ± standard deviation per patient: 4.5 ± 0.89 sections, median was 4; range 3–7 slices). In these sections 553 tumor

Discussion

In our evaluation we focussed on the value of up-to-date T2w eMRI for correct identification of tumor foci within the prostate regarding tumor size because T2w MRI is a robust and arbitrary repeatable MR technique, also representing the basic diagnostic standard of each prostate MR examination. Older studies that referred to tumor size did not use high-resolution imaging and/or used a low-field scanner (1.0 T and lower) [14], [15], [16]. Besides using higher field strength 1.5 and 3 T, advances

References (28)

  • B. Turkbey et al.

    Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2009)
  • G.J. Kelloff et al.

    Challenges in clinical prostate cancer: role of imaging

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2009)
  • H.U. Ahmed et al.

    Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy?

    Nat Rev Clin Oncol

    (2009)
  • A. Shukla-Dave et al.

    The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for predicting insignificant prostate cancer: an initial analysis

    BJU Int

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Drs Roethke and Lichy contributed equally to this work.

    View full text