Surface waves over currents and uneven bottom

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2018.11.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The propagation of surface water waves interacting with a current and an uneven bottom is studied. Such a situation is typical for ocean waves where the winds generate currents in the top layer of the ocean. The role of the bottom topography is taken into account since it also influences the local wave and current patterns. Specific scaling of the variables is selected which leads to approximations of Boussinesq and KdV types. The arising KdV equation with variable coefficients, dependent on the bottom topography, is studied numerically when the initial condition is in the form of the one soliton solution for the initial depth. Emergence of new solitons is observed as a result of the wave interaction with the uneven bottom.

Introduction

Surface waves are examples of geophysical waves found ubiquitously in the oceans. They usually result from distant winds and may travel thousands of miles before they decay or break. Typically surface wave heights are 1–2 m but extreme wave heights approaching nearly 20 m (excluding rogue waves) have been observed.

The complete dynamics of the fluid, in many situations, can be recovered from the surface wave motion. Therefore the wave propagation is an important research topic, with possible coastal and oceanic engineering applications in areas like oil platform stability and designs of structures like breakwaters and artificial reefs.

Various factors play a role in the formation and the dynamics of the surface waves. Some of these are rotational effects (for example currents) and the bottom topography. The propagation of waves over a current field is, in general, a complicated phenomenon and an active research topic. Currents exist due to many factors but primarily due to wind and tides. One of the most significant currents is the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) which can be observed at approximately 20 degrees south of the Equator. The EUC flows eastwards, at a speed of around one meter per second, one hundred meters below the ocean surface and is approximately 300 kilometers wide. Some more details about the complexity of the dynamics of EUC which pertain to the analysis of solutions can be found in the papers by Constantin and Johnson (2016a, 2017b). A general overview on mathematical tools employed for the study of problems in physical oceanography is given in Johnson (2018). We would also like to point out the recent emergence of solutions modelling large-scale ocean currents with distinctive persistence patterns like gyres (Constantin and Johnson, 2017a) and the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (Constantin and Johnson, 2016b). An analysis of a solution describing nonlinear surface waves propagating zonally on a zonal current in the presence of Coriolis effects and exhibiting two modes of wave motion was presented by Constantin and Monismith (2017).

For the aim of our investigations we consider two-dimensional flows in the f-plane approximation. Such an approach is reasonable since the Equator acts as a wave guide (Fedorov and Brown, 2009) and the depth-dependent currents are confined to a shallow near-surface layer. For a rigorous existence proof of rotational water flows in the f-plane approximation we refer the reader to the paper by Constantin (2013) see also the paper by Martin (2018).

In the review chapters by Peregrine (1976) and Jonsson (1990), the physical circumstances in which interactions among water waves and currents occur are discussed and also mathematical models of these interactions are outlined. Thomas (1981), Thomas (1990) studied the horizontal velocity distribution and surface elevation in a wave-current environment. A method has been developed for the measurement of the strength of the wave-current interaction by Thomas and Klopman (1997). A variety of other aspects has been an active research topic (Teles da Silva and Peregrine, 1988, Constantin and Strauss, 2004, Constantin and Escher, 2004, Constantin and Escher, 2011, Constantin et al., 2006, Henry, 2013, Constantin and Johnson, 2015, Constantin and Johnson, 2017a, Constantin and Johnson, 2017b, Escher et al., 2016). Recent developments in the mathematical aspects of wave-current interactions are presented in the monograph by Constantin (2011).

In physical reality, the seabed can be a complex undulating structure with trenches, underwater mountains and sediment, not to mention the multitude of marine flora and fauna. In some parts of the ocean, due to volcanic activity, the seabed is not even a stationary structure. Numerous studies are dedicated to the wave motion over an uneven bottom (Johnson, 1973a, Johnson, 1973b, Johnson, 1997, Nachbin, 2003, Craig et al., 2005a, Dejak and Sigal, 2006, de Bouard et al., 2008 Compelli et al., 2017; Nachbin and Ribeiro, 2018). In the majority of the existing publications however, the fluid is irrotational, i.e. the underlying current is not taken into account.

In our studies we are going to apply the Hamiltonian approach to derive models for surface wave propagation in the presence of a current and of an uneven bottom. The significance of the work of Hamilton in developing Hamiltonian mechanics in the early 19th century became apparent in the context of fluid systems following the publication of Vladimir Zakharov (1968) with additional constructions by Milder (1977) and Miles (1977). In his work Zakharov demonstrated the Hamiltonian structure of an infinitely deep vorticity-free single fluid system. Further significant studies which followed on include the works of Benjamin and Olver (1982), Craig and Groves (1994), Craig et al., 2005b, Craig et al., 2006 among others. The Hamiltonian approach in the analysis of irrotational single media systems, was then extended to include systems with nonzero vorticity. For instance a rotational single fluid system, of finite-depth, was shown by Constantin et al. (2008) to exhibit nearly canonical Hamiltonian structure and Wahlén (2007) showed that a fully canonical structure could indeed be achieved via a variable transformation. Moreover, Constantin et al. (2016) showed that wave-current interactions in stratified rotational flows also possess a Hamiltonian formulation.

Our aim is to derive and investigate a model, which takes into account both the effect of the current and the non-flat bottom. Such a situation is common for ocean waves and waves over the EUC are just one particular realistic example. To fulfil our goal we show first that the governing equations for gravity water flows in the f-plane approximation (near the Equator) that exhibit constant (non-vanishing) vorticity and propagate over a non-flat bed can be written in Hamiltonian form. Subsequently, we derive from the Hamiltonian formulation a small amplitude and a long-wave approximation, typically related to the Boussinesq and KdV propagation regimes. We use several mathematical results explained previously in Constantin et al. (2016) and Compelli et al. (2018). We would like to mention that the Hamiltonian formulation for two-layered stratified water flows over a flat bed and displaying piecewise constant vorticity in the equatorial f-plane approximation was accomplished by Ionescu-Kruse and Martin (2017).

Section snippets

System set-up

We consider an incompressible fluid system consisting of a single inviscid medium as shown in Fig. 1. The velocity profile of the underlying current is given in the same figure.

The average surface level is taken at y=0, and the average bottom level at y=h. The fluid domain Ω is bounded from above by the surface wave y=η(x,t) and underneath by a stationary impermeable bottom described by the function y=B(x). Since the average bottom level is y=h, it is suitable to introduce also the bottom

Governing equations

Denoting the velocity field using (u,v), the motion of the water flows we consider is governed by the equation of mass conservationux+vy=0,and Euler's equations in the presence of the Coriolis force{ut+uux+vuy+2ωv=1ρPx,vt+uvx+vvy2ωu=1ρPyg,where P=P(x,y,t) denotes the pressure, ω is the rotational speed of Earth, g is the gravitational acceleration and ρ denotes the density of the fluid and is assumed to be constant.

The vorticity of the water flow, defined as the curl of the velocity field (u

Hamiltonian formulation

The total energy written as the sum of kinetic and potential energy contributions isH=12ρRBη(u2+v2)dydx+ρgRBηydydx.This energy functional written in terms of the appropriate variables will serve as a Hamiltonian for the system under consideration. The energy of the current in the bottom layer is zero, in the middle layer (myl) is constant, so the only physical contribution to H is coming from the top layer. With computations, similar to those in Constantin et al. (2016), Compelli (2016)

The Boussinesq and KdV approximations

We will make now some further assumptions about the scales of the quantities involved. Introducing the usual small scale parametersε=ahandδ=hλ,where a is the typical wave amplitude and λ is the typical wavelength, we consider the long-wave and shallow water scaling regime. Then clearly η/h is of order ε. The operator h (where /x) has an eigenvalue of order 2πh/λ, that is of order δ. The quantity u=ξx has the meaning of a velocity multiplied by ρ, and therefore is of order ε; see more

Wave propagation

In this section we study numerically the wave propagation, as governed by Eq. (45). We assume for simplicity that κ=0 since it is much smaller than c (indeed, κ is usually 12ms1, while c is usually tens to hundreds ms1). The proper scale εδ2 means that for depths of magnitude h=200 m and wave amplitudes η20m we have wavelengths η/h(h/λ)2 or λ630m. For smaller amplitudes we have of course bigger wavelengths. We take h=200m and γ+2ω=0.1rads1 (which is a typical vorticity value that can be

Discussion

The motion of the wave surface is determined by the variables η(x,t) and the potential on the surface ϕ(x,t). The fluid potential φ(x,y,t) in the fluid body can be recovered from ϕ(x,t) (Craig et al., 2005a) and then the velocity field in the fluid body from Eq. (9a), (9b). In many cases there are internal waves which form below the surface, between the top layer of warm water and the bottom layer of cold water with high salinity and higher density. There are by now numerous studies of a fluid

Acknowledgements

AC, RI and CM are grateful to the Erwin Schrödinger International Institute for Mathematics and Physics (ESI), Vienna (Austria) for the opportunity to work on the Research in Teams project Hamiltonian approach to modelling geophysical waves and currents with impact on natural hazards (2017) and to participate in the programme Mathematical Aspects of Physical Oceanography (2018) where a significant part of this work has been accomplished. AC is supported by a Fiosraigh fellowship at Dublin

References (54)

  • A. Compelli

    Hamiltonian approach to the modeling of internal geophysical waves with vorticity

    Mon. Math.

    (2016)
  • A. Compelli et al.

    The dynamics of flat surface internal geophysical waves with currents

    J. Math. Fluid Mech.

    (2017)
  • A. Compelli et al.

    Hamiltonian models for the propagation of irrotational surface gravity waves over a variable bottom

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A

    (2018)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    Symmetry of steady periodic surface water waves with vorticity

    J. Fluid Mech.

    (2004)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    Exact steady periodic water waves with vorticity

    Comm. Pure Appl. Math.

    (2004)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    Variational formulations for steady water waves with vorticity

    J. Fluid Mech.

    (2006)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    Nearly-Hamiltonian structure for water waves with constant vorticity

    J. Math. Fluid Mech.

    (2008)
  • Constantin, A., 2011. Nonlinear water waves with applications to wave-current interactions and tsunamis. CBMS-NSF...
  • A. Constantin et al.

    Analyticity of periodic traveling free surface water waves with vorticity

    Ann. Math.

    (2011)
  • A. Constantin

    On equatorial wind waves

    Differ. Integral Eqs

    (2013)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    A Hamiltonian approach to wave-current interactions in two-layer fluids

    Phys. Fluids

    (2015)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    The dynamics of waves interacting with the Equatorial Undercurrent

    Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn.

    (2015)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    Hamiltonian formulation for wave-current interactions in stratified rotational flows

    Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.

    (2016)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    An exact, steady, purely azimuthal equatorial flow with a free surface

    J. Phys. Oceanogr.

    (2016)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    An exact, steady, purely azimuthal flow as a model for the Antarctic Circumpolar Current

    J. Phys. Oceanogr.

    (2016)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    Large gyres as a shallow-water asymptotic solution of Euler's equation in spherical coordinates

    Proc. Roy. Soc. A.

    (2017)
  • A. Constantin et al.

    A nonlinear, three-dimensional model for ocean flows, motivated by some observations of the Pacific Equatorial Undercurrent and thermocline

    Phys. Fluids

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text