Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable Gallbladder Cancer is Underutilized Despite Benefits in Node-Positive Patients

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is recommended following surgical resection of gallbladder cancer regardless of stage. However, stage-specific benefits of AC in gallbladder cancer are unclear.

Patients and Methods

Patients with resected pathologic stage I–III gallbladder cancer were identified using the 2006–2015 National Cancer Database. Utilization trends, predictors of use, and impact of AC on overall survival (OS) were determined.

Results

A total of 5656 patients were included. Use of AC increased from 9.9% in 2006 to 24.2% in 2015 (OR 2.91; 95% CI 2.06–4.09; p < 0.001). However, only 17.5% of patients overall and only 32.4% of node-positive (stage IIIb) patients received AC. Patients receiving AC were younger and had fewer comorbidities, shorter hospitalizations, more advanced disease, and more margin-positive resections (all p < 0.01). Higher pathologic T stage and positive nodal status represented the greatest independent predictors of receipt of AC. While AC demonstrated no OS advantage for stage I patients (p = 0.83), AC was associated with improved OS among stage II patients (p = 0.003), though this impact was not independently associated with improved OS on multivariable analysis. AC was independently associated with improved OS among stage IIIb patients, with a 30% reduction in risk of death (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58–0.83; p < 0.001). Younger age, fewer comorbidities, and shorter hospitalization all predicted receipt of AC among stage IIIb patients (all p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Systemic therapy remains underprescribed, in particular among patients that would seem to benefit most. Adjuvant chemotherapy likely improves survival in node-positive gallbladder cancer, but its utility in the treatment of node-negative disease has not been demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhu AX, Hong TS, Hezel AF, Kooby DA. Current management of gallbladder carcinoma. Oncologist. 2010;15(2):168–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hundal R, Shaffer EA. Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and outcome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:99–109.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC, Sharma ID. Carcinoma of the gallbladder. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4(3):167–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levy AD, Murakata LA, Rohrmann CA, Jr. Gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2001;21(2):295–314; questionnaire, 549–255.

  5. Dixon E, Vollmer CM, Jr., Sahajpal A, et al. An aggressive surgical approach leads to improved survival in patients with gallbladder cancer: a 12-year study at a North American Center. Ann Surg. 2005;241(3):385–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Hepatobiliary Cancers. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/hepatobiliary.pdf. Published 2019. Updated 20 December 2019. Accessed 2020.

  7. Aloia TA, Jarufe N, Javle M, et al. Gallbladder cancer: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(8):681–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shirai Y, Wakai T, Sakata J, Hatakeyama K. Regional lymphadenectomy for gallbladder cancer: rational extent, technical details, and patient outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(22):2775–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Primrose JN, Fox RP, Palmer DH, et al. Capecitabine compared with observation in resected biliary tract cancer (BILCAP): a randomised, controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(5):663–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebata T, Hirano S, Konishi M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant gemcitabine chemotherapy versus observation in resected bile duct cancer. Br J Surg. 2018;105(3):192–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Edeline J, Benabdelghani M, Bertaut A, et al. Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy or surveillance in resected biliary tract cancer (PRODIGE 12-ACCORD 18-UNICANCER GI): a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(8):658–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben-Josef E, Guthrie KA, El-Khoueiry AB, et al. SWOG S0809: A phase II intergroup trial of adjuvant capecitabine and gemcitabine followed by radiotherapy and concurrent capecitabine in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(24):2617–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shroff RT, Kennedy EB, Bachini M, et al. Adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(12):1015–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergquist JR, Shah HN, Habermann EB, et al. Adjuvant systemic therapy after resection of node positive gallbladder cancer: Time for a well-designed trial? (Results of a US-national retrospective cohort study). Int J Surg. 2018;52:171–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, et al. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(14):1273–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sharma A, Dwary AD, Mohanti BK, et al. Best supportive care compared with chemotherapy for unresectable gall bladder cancer: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4581–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghidini M, Tomasello G, Botticelli A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected biliary tract cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(9):741–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Siebenhuner AR, Seifert H, Bachmann H, et al. Adjuvant treatment of resectable biliary tract cancer with cisplatin plus gemcitabine: a prospective single center phase II study. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. Kemp Bohan and Dr. Kirby are cofirst authors and contributed equally to the work. All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work or providing critical revisions; and all approved of the final version to be published. All authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Nelson DO.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The results and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Army Medical Department, Department of the Army, Department of Defense, or the US Government.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kemp Bohan, P.M., Kirby, D.T., Chick, R.C. et al. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resectable Gallbladder Cancer is Underutilized Despite Benefits in Node-Positive Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 28, 1466–1480 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08973-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08973-x

Navigation