Skip to main content
Log in

Early double J stent removal in renal transplant patients to prevent urinary tract infection – systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ureteral stents are routinely used in renal transplant and are associated with reduced urological complications but increased urinary tract infections (UTIs). There is no agreement on the preferred time to removal of stents after transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing stent duration of <14 days vs > =14 days. Electronic databases were searched to identify RCTs that compared early vs late stent removal. Primary outcome was urinary tract infections. Secondary outcomes included various urological complications. No significant difference in UTI rates was demonstrated between short and long stent duration (relative risk (RR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–1.64), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 86%). Sensitivity analysis evaluating studies with low risk of bias for allocation concealment demonstrated statistically significant lower rates of UTI with short stent duration (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32–0.71) with no heterogeneity. No significant difference was demonstrated for the outcome of major urological complications (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50–1.05), without heterogeneity. Ureteral stenosis rates were significantly lower in the short duration arm (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18–0.98). Early removal of ureteral stents after renal transplant may be associated with reduced rates of UTI and ureteral stenosis. Additional RCTs are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Routh JC, Yu RN, Kozinn SI et al (2013) Urological complications and vesicoureteral reflux following pediatric kidney transplantation. J Urol 189:1071–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar A, Verma BS, Srivastava A et al (2000) Evaluation of the urological complications of living related renal transplantation at a single center during the last 10 years: impact of the double-J* stent. J Urol 164:657–660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mangus RS, Haag BW (2004) Stented versus nonstented extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation: a metaanalysis. Am J Transplant 4:1889–1896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson CH, Rix DA, Manas DM (2013) Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD004925

    Google Scholar 

  5. Minnee RC, Bemelman FJ, Laguna Pes PP et al (2009) Effectiveness of a 5-day external stenting protocol on urological complications after renal transplantation. World J Surg 33:2722–2726

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pleass HC, Clark KR, Rigg KM et al (1995) Urologic complications after renal transplantation: a prospective randomized trial comparing different techniques of ureteric anastomosis and the use of prophylactic ureteric stents. Transplant Proc 27:1091–1092

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang L, Wang X, Ma Y et al (2012) Comparative study of 3-week and 6-week duration of double-J stent placement in renal transplantrecipients. Urol Int 89:89–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parapiboon W, Ingsathit A, Disthabanchong S et al (2012) Impact of early ureteric stent removal and cost-benefit analysis in kidney transplant recipients: results of a randomized controlled study. Transplant Proc 44:737–739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ay N, Bahadır MV, Anıl M et al (2015) Comparison of anti-reflux mechanism between double-J-stent and standart double-J-stent use for risk of BK nephropathy and urinary tract infection in kidney transplantation. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:16340–16345

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Higgins JPT, Green S (ed) (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 30 December 2017

  11. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dadkhah F, Yari H, Ali Asgari M et al (2016) Benefits and complications of removing ureterak stent based on the elapsed time after renal transplantation surgery. Nephrourol Mon 8:e31108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Indu KN, Lakshminarayana G, Anil M et al (2012) Is early removal of prophylactic ureteric stents beneficial in live donor renal transplantation? Indian J Nephrol 22:275–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Taghizadeh-Afshari A, Alizadeh M, Farshid S (2014) Comparison of complications and short term results of conventional technique during graft ureteral stent insertion in bari technique at Emam K hospital, Urmia. Glob J Health Sci 6:31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel P, Sinha M, Mamode N et al (2011) Transplant ureteric stent trial (trust): early versus standard removal. A randomised controlled trial-pilot data [abstract]. Transpl Int 24:205

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gunawansa N, Wijeyaratne M, Cassim R et al (2015) Early bedside removal versus delayed cystoscopic removal of ureteric stents following live donor renal transplantation: a randomized prospective study. Transpl Int 28:119

    Google Scholar 

  17. Green H, Rahamimov R, Goldberg E et al (2013) Consequences of treated versus untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria in the first year following kidney transplantation: retrospective observational study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32:127–131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dafna Yahav.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest. The results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part.

Ethical approval

Not necessary.

Informed consent

Irrelevant due to study design.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yahav, D., Green, H., Eliakim-Raz, N. et al. Early double J stent removal in renal transplant patients to prevent urinary tract infection – systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37, 773–778 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3173-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3173-7

Keywords

Navigation