X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Language
Region
Library
Years
Person/Organisation
Subjects(RVK)
Keywords
Access
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Free public reason : making it up as we go (1996)
    New York :Oxford University Press,
    Details
    UID:
    almafu_9959231811802883
    Format: 1 online resource (xii, 203 pages)
    ISBN: 0-19-773042-6 , 1-280-52810-9 , 0-19-535700-0 , 1-4294-0665-8
    Series Statement: Oxford scholarship online
    Content: This study examines the idea of public justification, stressing its importance but also questioning the coherence of the concept itself. D'Agostino shows that the concept is composed of various values, interests and notions regarding the common good.
    Note: Bibliography: p185-191. _ Includes index. , Previously issued in print: 1996. , Contents; 1. Introduction; 1. Précis; 2. Retrospective; 3. Prospective; 2. Some Apparatus; 3. The Idea of Public Justification; 4. Some Conceptions of Public Justification; 5. The Ideal of Public Justification; 6. Prima Facie Incoherence; 7. Overarching Principles and Perspectives?; 8. Responses to and Diagnosis of Prima Facie Incoherence; 9. 'Solving' the Problem; 10. Assessing the Solution; 11. Conclusion; Bibliography; Index , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-19-509761-0
    Language: English
    DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195097610.001.0001
    URL: Volltext
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Online Access
    Open Access Request
    FU Berlin
    MPI Bildungsforschung
  • 2
    Book
    Book
    Free public reason : making it up as we go (1996)
    New York [u.a.] :Oxford Univ. Press,
    Details
    UID:
    almahu_BV010859764
    Format: XII, 203 S.
    ISBN: 0-19-509761-0
    Content: Free Public Reason examines the idea of public justification, stressing its importance but also questioning the coherence of the concept itself. Although public justification is employed in the work of theorists such as John Rawls, Jeremy Waldron, Thomas Nagel, and others, it has received little attention on its own as a philosophical concept. D'Agostino shows that the ideal behind this concept is constituted by many, sometimes competing, demands and that no formal way of weighing these demands can be identified. The notion of public justification itself is thus shown to be contestable. In demonstrating this, D'Agostino questions many current political theories that rely on this concept
    Content: Having broken down the foundations of public justification, D'Agostino then draws on the ideas of Dworkin and Kuhn as well as insights from feminism and post-modernism to offer an alternative model of how a workable consensus on its meaning might be reached through the interactions of a community of interpreters or delegates at a constitutional convention
    Language: English
    Subjects: Philosophy
    RVK:
    CC 7800
    Keywords: Legitimität ; Politische Theorie
    URL: http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=007258320&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Book
    HU Berlin get availability status
Nothing or not found what you are looking for? Please check your search query or use the Interlibrary Loan Search.
Did you mean 0195047710?
Did you mean 0195051610?
Did you mean 0195037510?
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages