Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    [s.l.] : University of Michigan Press
    UID:
    b3kat_BV042566530
    Format: 1 nline-Ressource (336 Seiten)
    ISBN: 9780472029662 , 9780472119097
    Note: It is commonly believed that a state facing a terrorist threat responds with severe legislation that compromises civil liberties in favour of national security. Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies— the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand— over the past 15 years. He examines each nation’s development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, which often allow national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by institutional interests and prior beliefs and are complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government’s impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst anti-terror excesses have taken place outside of, rather than within, the law and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers. This title was made Open Access by libraries from around the world through Knowledge Unlatched
    Language: English
    Subjects: Political Science
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: USA ; Großbritannien ; Kanada ; Australien ; Neuseeland ; Terrorismus ; Bekämpfung ; Gesetzgebung ; Rechtsvergleich ; Geschichte 2001-2014
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Book
    Book
    Ann Arbor, Mich. :Univ. of Michigan Press,
    UID:
    almahu_BV041465642
    Format: XIV, 320 S.
    ISBN: 978-0-472-11909-7
    Series Statement: Knowledge unlatched pilot collection
    Note: Titel ist im Rahmen der Initiative Knowledge Unlatched frei zugänglich.
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe ISBN 9780472029662
    Language: English
    Subjects: Political Science
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Terrorismus ; Bekämpfung ; Gesetzgebung ; Rechtsvergleich
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press | Ann Arbor :The University of Michigan Press,
    UID:
    almafu_9958107614802883
    Format: 1 online resource (xiv, 320 pages)
    ISBN: 0-472-11909-5
    Series Statement: Open Access e-Books
    Content: It is commonly believed that a state facing a terrorist threat responds with severe legislation that compromises civil liberties in favour of national security. Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies-- the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand-- over the past 15 years. He examines each nation's development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, which often allow national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by institutional interests and prior beliefs and are complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government's impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst anti-terror excesses have taken place outside of, rather than within, the law and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers.
    Note: The specter of terrorism -- Responding to the threat -- What is terrorism? -- Gathering information -- Protecting government secrets while protecting due process? -- Guilt by association -- Terrorism offences -- Detention without conviction -- Torture and coercive questioning. , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 1-322-51522-0
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-472-02966-5
    Language: English
    Keywords: Electronic books. ; Electronic books. ; Electronic books. ; Electronic books. ; Electronic books. ; Electronic books. ; Electronic books.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ann Arbor :The University of Michigan Press,
    UID:
    almafu_9959646204402883
    Format: 1 online resource (xiv, 320 pages)
    ISBN: 9780472029662 , 0472029665 , 9780472900022 , 0472900021
    Content: It is commonly believed that a state facing a terrorist threat responds with severe legislation that compromises civil liberties in favour of national security. Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies-- the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand-- over the past 15 years. He examines each nation's development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, which often allow national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by institutional interests and prior beliefs and are complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government's impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst anti-terror excesses have taken place outside of, rather than within, the law and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers.
    Note: Introduction -- 1. The specter of terrorism -- 2. Responding to the threat -- 3. What is terrorism? -- 4. Gathering information -- 5. Protecting government secrets while protecting due process? -- 6. Guilt by association -- 7. Terrorism offences -- 8. Detention without conviction -- 9. Torture and coercive questioning -- Conclusion.
    Language: English
    Keywords: Electronic books
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ann Arbor :The University of Michigan Press,
    UID:
    edocfu_9959646204402883
    Format: 1 online resource (xiv, 320 pages)
    ISBN: 9780472029662 , 0472029665 , 9780472900022 , 0472900021
    Content: It is commonly believed that a state facing a terrorist threat responds with severe legislation that compromises civil liberties in favour of national security. Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies-- the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand-- over the past 15 years. He examines each nation's development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, which often allow national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by institutional interests and prior beliefs and are complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government's impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst anti-terror excesses have taken place outside of, rather than within, the law and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers.
    Note: Introduction -- 1. The specter of terrorism -- 2. Responding to the threat -- 3. What is terrorism? -- 4. Gathering information -- 5. Protecting government secrets while protecting due process? -- 6. Guilt by association -- 7. Terrorism offences -- 8. Detention without conviction -- 9. Torture and coercive questioning -- Conclusion.
    Language: English
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ann Arbor :The University of Michigan Press,
    UID:
    edoccha_9959646204402883
    Format: 1 online resource (xiv, 320 pages)
    ISBN: 9780472029662 , 0472029665 , 9780472900022 , 0472900021
    Content: It is commonly believed that a state facing a terrorist threat responds with severe legislation that compromises civil liberties in favour of national security. Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies-- the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand-- over the past 15 years. He examines each nation's development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, which often allow national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by institutional interests and prior beliefs and are complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government's impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst anti-terror excesses have taken place outside of, rather than within, the law and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers.
    Note: Introduction -- 1. The specter of terrorism -- 2. Responding to the threat -- 3. What is terrorism? -- 4. Gathering information -- 5. Protecting government secrets while protecting due process? -- 6. Guilt by association -- 7. Terrorism offences -- 8. Detention without conviction -- 9. Torture and coercive questioning -- Conclusion.
    Language: English
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ann Arbor :University of Michigan Press,
    UID:
    kobvindex_HPB1196822362
    Format: 1 online resource (xiv, 320 pages)
    ISBN: 9780472029662 , 0472029665 , 9780472900022 , 0472900021
    Content: It is commonly believed that a state facing a terrorist threat responds with severe legislation that compromises civil liberties in favour of national security. Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies-- the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand-- over the past 15 years. He examines each nation's development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, which often allow national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by institutional interests and prior beliefs and are complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government's impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst anti-terror excesses have taken place outside of, rather than within, the law and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers.
    Note: The specter of terrorism -- Responding to the threat -- What is terrorism? -- Gathering information -- Protecting government secrets while protecting due process? -- Guilt by association -- Terrorism offences -- Detention without conviction -- Torture and coercive questioning.
    Additional Edition: Print version: Douglas, Roger (Roger Neil). Law, liberty, and the pursuit of terrorism. Ann Arbor : The University of Michigan Press, [2014] ISBN 9780472119097
    Language: English
    Keywords: Electronic books.
    URL: DOAB
    URL: JSTOR
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: OAPEN
    URL: Image  (Thumbnail cover image)
    URL: Image  (Thumbnail cover image)
    URL: Image
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ann Arbor, Mich. : Univ. of Michigan Press
    UID:
    gbv_770096476
    Format: Online-Ressource (XIV, 320 S.)
    ISBN: 9780472119097
    Content: It is commonly believed that a state facing a terrorist threat responds with severe legislation that compromises civil liberties in favour of national security. Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies— the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand— over the past 15 years. He examines each nation’s development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, which often allow national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by institutional interests and prior beliefs and are complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government’s impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst anti-terror excesses have taken place outside of, rather than within, the law and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers. This title was made Open Access by libraries from around the world through Knowledge Unlatched
    Note: Description based upon print version of record , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9780472029662
    Additional Edition: Print version Douglas, Roger Law, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Terrorism Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press,c2014
    Language: English
    Keywords: Freiheitsrecht ; Menschenrecht ; Terrorismus ; Electronic books
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press | Ann Arbor, Michigan :University of Michigan Press,
    UID:
    almahu_9949711359202882
    Format: 1 online resource (xiv, 320 pages)
    ISBN: 0-472-11909-5 , 0-472-90002-1
    Series Statement: Open Access e-Books
    Content: It is commonly believed that a state facing a terrorist threat responds with severe legislation that compromises civil liberties in favour of national security. Roger Douglas compares responses to terrorism by five liberal democracies-- the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand-- over the past 15 years. He examines each nation's development and implementation of counterterrorism law, specifically in the areas of information gathering, the definition of terrorist offenses, due process for the accused, detention, and torture and other forms of coercive questioning. Douglas finds that terrorist attacks elicit pressures for quick responses, which often allow national governments to accrue additional powers. But emergencies are neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for such laws, which may persist even after fears have eased. He argues that responses are influenced by institutional interests and prior beliefs and are complicated when the exigencies of office and beliefs point in different directions. He also argues that citizens are wary of government's impingement on civil liberties and that courts exercise their capacity to restrain the legislative and executive branches. Douglas concludes that the worst anti-terror excesses have taken place outside of, rather than within, the law and that the legacy of 9/11 includes both laws that expand government powers and judicial decisions that limit those very powers.
    Note: The specter of terrorism -- Responding to the threat -- What is terrorism? -- Gathering information -- Protecting government secrets while protecting due process? -- Guilt by association -- Terrorism offences -- Detention without conviction -- Torture and coercive questioning. , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-472-02966-5
    Additional Edition: ISBN 1-322-51522-0
    Language: English
    Keywords: Electronic books.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Did you mean 0472029525?
Did you mean 0472122665?
Did you mean 0472099655?
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages