Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund

UID:

Series Statement: Banco Mundial. (2010). Indicadores de crecimiento y desarrollo. Recuperado a partir de http://datos.bancomundial.org/. Bodie, G. D., & Dutta, M. J. (2008). Understanding health literacy for strategic health marketing: eHealth literacy, health disparities, and the digital divide. Health marketing quarterly, 25(1-2), 175-203. doi:10.1080/07359680802126301

Content: El presente trabajo se direcciona hacia el aprovechamiento de las TIC para la educación en salud. Indaga por el concepto de Alfabetización en eSalud y su relación con la Alfabetización en Salud como forma de sustentar la posibilidad de “recetar” actividades de eSalud en función de los niveles de alfabetización de los pacientes. Objetivo: Evaluar el constructo de Alfabetización en eSalud operacionalizado en el instrumento eHEALS. Método: Desde un método transversal correlacional se aplican los instrumentos eHeals, NVS y una encuesta de caracterización sociodemográfica a una muestra de 136 sujetos santandereanos con edad media de 28.8 años (SD=9.11) 72% mujeres. Resultados: Se identifican factores coherentes con la lógica de la Alfabetización en eSalud en el eHeals que explican el 72,17% de la varianza, consistencia interna = ,924. AUROC = ,702 usando la calidad de páginas web como criterio. Discusión: Se concluye como valido el constructo de Alfabetización en eSalud que sustenta el eHeals, sin embargo se recomienda profundizar en diferencias sociodemográficas que pueden generar confusión respecto a la Alfabetización digital y en Salud.

Content: 1. INTRODUCCIÓN............................................................................................... 10 1.1 Pregunta problema. ...................................................................................... 11 1.2 Objetivos ...................................................................................................... 11 1.2.1 Objetivo General. ................................................................................... 11 1.2.2 Objetivos Específicos. ............................................................................ 11 2. ESTADO DEL ARTE ......................................................................................... 13 3. MÉTODO ........................................................................................................... 18 3.1 Enfoque de investigación. ............................................................................ 18 3.2 Tipo de estudio. ............................................................................................ 18 3.3 Diseño. ......................................................................................................... 183.4 Muestreo. ..................................................................................................... 183.4.1 Tamaño de la muestra. ............................................................................. 18 3.5 Sujetos. ........................................................................................................ 18 3.6 Instrumentos ................................................................................................ 19 3.6.1 eHeals. ................................................................................................... 19 3.6.2 Newest Vital Sign. .................................................................................. 19 3.7 Procedimiento .............................................................................................. 194. RESULTADOS .................................................................................................. 21 4.1 Analisis Psicometrico Instrumento eHeals ................................................... 21 4.1.1 Análisis eHEALS ocho ítems. .................................................................... 21 4.1.2 Análisis eHEALS diez ítems. ................................................................. 23 4.2 Descripción del nivel de Alfabetización en eSalud y Salud .......................... 24 4.2.1 Descripción de la muestra ..................................................................... 24 4.2.2 Características relacionadas con la salud .............................................. 25 4.2.3 Análisis de categorías de respuesta al eHeals. ..................................... 26 4.2.4 Análisis de los resultados totales obtenidos en el NVS ......................... 27 4.3 Perfiles de uso general y orientado a salud de Internet y su relación con la Alfabetización en Salud y eSalud. ...................................................................... 274.3.1 Uso General ........................................................................................... 27 4.3.2 Usos específicos para la búsqueda de información en salud. ............... 28 4.3.3 Relación entre perfiles de uso general y específico a salud. ................. 30 4.3.4 Relación entre los perfiles de uso y Alfabetización en Salud y eSalud .. 31 4. 5 Análisis ROC eHeals criterio Web frecuentada. .......................................... 32 5. CONCLUSIONES .............................................................................................. 33 5.1 Conclusiones en relación al constructo de eSalud en el eHEALS. .............. 33 5.2 Conclusiones en relación al uso del internet orientado a salud.................... 33 5.3 Conclusiones en relación a la las fuentes de información. ........................... 34 5.4 Conclusiones finales. ................................................................................... 34 6. BIBLIOGRAFÍA ................................................................................................. 35 8. ANEXOS ........................................................................................................... 40

Content: Maestría

Content: This work is directed towards the use of ICT for health education. It investigates the concept of eHealth Literacy and its relationship with Health Literacy as a way of supporting the possibility of “prescribing” eHealth activities based on the literacy levels of the patients. Objective: To evaluate the eHealth Literacy construct operationalized in the eHEALS instrument. Method: From a correlational cross-sectional method, the eHeals, NVS instruments and a sociodemographic characterization survey are applied to a sample of 136 Santander subjects with a mean age of 28.8 years (SD = 9.11) 72% women. Results: Coherent factors with the eHealth Literacy logic were identified in the eHeals that explain 72.17% of the variance, internal consistency = .924. AUROC = .702 using the quality of web pages as a criterion. Discussion: The eHeals Literacy construct that supports the eHeals is concluded as valid, however, it is recommended to delve into sociodemographic differences that can generate confusion regarding digital and Health Literacy.

Language: Spanish

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (25 Seiten)

ISSN: 1469-9915 , 1469-9915

Content: This paper reports on a co-laborative laboratory ethnography in a molecular biology laboratory conducting research on environmental epigenetics. It focuses on a single study concerned with the material implications of social differentiation. The analysis briefly raises biopolitical concerns. Its main concern lies with an understanding of the human body as local in its working infrastructure or "inner laboratory", an understanding that emerges from the co-laborative inquiry between biologists and anthropologist. This co-laborative mode of inquiry raises productive tensions within biology as to the universal or local nature of human nature and within anthropology as to the status of human biology within social theory. The paper cannot resolve this tension. Rather it explores it as an epistemic object in the context of interdisciplinarity, ontography and co-laboration. In concluding, it specifies co-laboration as temporary, non-teleological joint epistemic work aimed at producing new kinds of reflexivity.

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: Published first as (erstmalig folgendermaßen erschienen): Jörg Niewöhner: “Epigenetics: Localizing biology through co-laboration”. In: New Genetics and Society 34.2 (2015), pages 219–242. DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2015.1036154

In: : Taylor & Francis, 34,2, Seiten 219-242, 1469-9915

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/19377

DOI: 10.1080/14636778.2015.1036154

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/20139-7

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (10 Seiten)

Content: The task of restoring floodplains, as a means of improving flood protection or providing other benefits, poses multi-dimensional challenges to policy-makers and project managers alike. Involving essentially a reconfiguration of the interaction between a river and adjacent low-lying land, floodplain restoration affects a wide range of institutions designed to secure a variety of private and public goods associated with water and land use. A scheme to restore a floodplain requires the successful enrolment of these institutions in such a way as to create a result acceptable to the principal stakeholders. This is a highly complex process. This paper, based on EU-funded research on the policy contexts and selected pilot schemes of floodplain restoration in Germany, France and England and Wales, provides a critical appraisal of the institutional drivers and constraints of floodplain restoration. In particular, it explores how recent shifts in problem awareness and problem-solving in a number of relevant policy fields are creating windows of opportunity for more integrated approaches to restoring floodplains. At the same time it demonstrates the emergence of a new policy delivery gap emanating from the growing complexity of new generation floodplain restoration schemes.

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: Originally published as: Timothy Moss (2007) Institutional drivers and constraints of floodplain restoration in Europe, International Journal of River Basin Management, 5:2, 121-130, DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2007.9635312

In: International journal of river basin management, London : Taylor & Francis, 5,2007,2, Seiten 121-130

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/21583

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22567-5

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (20 Seiten)

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: Originally published as: Timothy Moss (2000) Unearthing Water Flows, Uncovering Social Relations: Introducing New Waste Water Technologies in Berlin, Journal of Urban Technology, 7:1, 63-84, DOI: 10.1080/713684106

In: Journal of urban technology, Abingdon : Carfax, Taylor & Francis, 7,2000,1, Seiten 63-84

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/21585

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22552-9

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (25 Seiten)

ISSN: 1036-1146 , 1036-1146

Content: This article presents a novel analytical account of the relationship between deliberation and representation by reconstructing the specific institutional logics that guide deliberative action in parliaments. In contrast to the dominant generalised paradigm in empirical deliberation research it develops a contextualised-systemic approach. The article argues that the parliamentary context is characterised by a tension between two equally legitimate institutional logics: a discursive one, institutionalised through parliamentary procedures, and a positional one, constituted by relations of representation. The resulting theoretical model links the specific institutional and situational conditions to different forms and functions of deliberation. Depending on the specific balance between both logics deliberation fulfils functions of either integration or contestation. The model is applied to a comparative analysis of different cases of parliaments demonstrating how this account can advance both the comparative analysis of deliberation in representative institutions and the development of deliberative democracy after the systemic turn.

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: Final version published as: Andreas Schäfer: Deliberation in representative institutions: an analytical framework for a systemic approach. In: Australian Journal of Political Science 52(3), 2017, pages 419–435. DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2017.1330397

In: London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 52,3, Seiten 419-435, 1036-1146

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/23790

DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2017.1330397

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/24469-4

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (17 Seiten)

ISSN: 1354-9839 , 1354-9839

Content: Issues of connectivity between different infrastructure sectors have received surprisingly little attention in recent research. Despite huge interest in issues of sectoral integration surrounding the water–energy nexus, researchers have rarely considered what this might mean for the coupling of infrastructure systems for water/wastewater and energy services. Consequently, the implications of greater connectivity for the governance and socio-spatial constitution of infrastructures are largely unexplored. This paper addresses this research gap with a case study of an attempt to use treated wastewater to produce biomass for energy on degraded land in the Berlin-Brandenburg region of Germany. It takes water reuse for energy crop production as an exemplar of work at the water–energy nexus in order to explore the institutional, spatial and physical dimensions involved in connecting two infrastructure systems to this end. It argues that cross-sectoral integration reaches far beyond issues of technological compatibility, revealing often hidden but crucial differences in the institutional and spatial configuration of energy and wastewater systems. On the basis of a comparative analysis of the institutional arrangements of the region’s wastewater and energy systems together with an empirical study of initiatives to use treated wastewater to grow energy crops the paper draws conclusions, firstly, on the potential and limitations of this particular exemplar and, secondly, on the broader implications of the case for understanding institutional challenges of cross-sectoral connectivity on the one hand and prospects for reconfiguring infrastructural relations between cities and rural areas on the other.

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: Originally published as: Timothy Moss, Matthias Naumann & Katharina Krause (2017) Turning wastewater into energy: challenges of reconfiguring regional infrastructures in the Berlin–Brandenburg region, Local Environment, 22:3, 269-285, DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2016.1195799

In: Local environment, London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2017, 22,2016,3, Seiten 269-285, 1354-9839

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/21581

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22563-1

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (11 Seiten)

Content: The aim of this paper is to explore how classic upstream-downstream conflicts of water resources management can be interpreted more broadly in terms of spatial misfits and disparities between the river basin, territorial jurisdictions, degrees of political influence and socio-economic conditions. It applies the analytical concept of spatial fit in order to explore issues of governance in managing water in the Dongjiang River basin, selected by virtue of the huge political and economic asymmetries existing between the upstream Jiangxi Province and the downstream Pearl River delta region. Using the concept of spatial fit, the paper explores the complex environmental, socio-economic and political geographies which frame the interdependencies of water use and management within the river basin. It analyses attempts by stakeholders at different levels and locations in the basin to advance their own water-related interests and the initiatives some are developing to share benefits and costs more equitably across the basin.

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: First published as: Frederick Lee & Timothy Moss (2014) Spatial fit and water politics: managing asymmetries in the Dongjiang River basin, International Journal of River Basin Management, 12:4, 329-339, DOI: 10.1080/15715124.2014.917420

In: International journal of river basin management, London : Taylor & Francis, 12,2014,4, Seiten 329-339

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/21579

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22566-9

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (7 Seiten)

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: First published as: Jens Newig & Timothy Moss (2017) Scale in environmental governance: moving from con-cepts and cases to consolidation, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19:5, 473-479, DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1390926

In: London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 19,5, Seiten 473-479

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/21590

DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1390926

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22551-4

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (23 Seiten)

ISSN: 1753-5069 , 1753-5069

Content: This paper explores new geographies of coproduction emerging in urban energy politics. It analyses processes of remunicipalisation of urban utilities, involving the re-establishment of public ownership with a strong democratic and ecological agenda for governing energy infrastructures, with case studies of the German cities of Berlin and Hamburg. Seeking ways of understanding these developments which transcend conventional binaries such as public vs. private ownership or consumer vs. producer, we interpret them in relation to debates first about coproduction and then about urban commons. This latter concept, we argue, provides deeper analytical purchase on new grassroots energy initiatives and the politics that unfold in remunicipalisation conflicts, offering a new avenue for enriching research on the coproduction of energy.

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: Originally published as: S. Becker, M. Naumann & T. Moss (2017) Between coproduction and commons: understanding initiatives to reclaim urban energy provision in Berlin and Hamburg, Urban Research & Practice, 10:1, 63-85, DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2016.1156735

In: Abingdon : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 10,1, Seiten 63-85, 1753-5069

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/21574

DOI: 10.1080/17535069.2016.1156735

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22564-7

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)

UID:

Format: 1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten)

Content: As one of the most ambitious national energy transition initiatives worldwide, the German Energiewende is attracting a huge amount of attention globally in both policy and research circles. The paper explores the implementation of Germany’s energy transition through the lens of organization and ownership in urban and regional contexts. Following a summary of the principal institutional challenges of the Energiewende at local and regional levels the paper develops a novel way of conceptualizing the institutional to urban and regional energy transitions in terms of agency and power, ideas and discourse, and commons and ownership. This analytical heuristic is applied to a two-tier empirical study of the Berlin-Brandenburg region. The first tier involves a survey of the organizational landscape of energy infrastructures and services in cities, towns and villages in Brandenburg. The second tier comprises a case study of current, competing initiatives for (re-)gaining ownership of the power grid and utility in Berlin. The paper draws conclusions on the diverse and dynamic organizational responses to the Energiewende at the local level, what these tell us about urban and regional energy governance and how they are inspired by – or in opposition to – new forms of collective ownership resonant of recent debates on reclaiming the commons. It concludes with observations on how relational approaches to institutional research and the notion of the commons can guide and inspire future research on socio-technical transitions in general, and urban energy transitions in particular.

Content: Peer Reviewed

Note: Originally published as: Timothy Moss, Sören Becker & Matthias Naumann (2015) Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation and ownership of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions, Local Environment, 20:12, 1547-1563, DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2014.915799

In: Taylor & Francis : Taylor & Francis, 2015, 20,12, Seiten 1547-1563

Language: English

DOI: 10.18452/21582

DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2014.915799

URN: urn:nbn:de:kobv:11-110-18452/22568-1

URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)