Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Language
Region
Years
Person/Organisation
Subjects(RVK)
Access
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,
    UID:
    almahu_9947414946102882
    Format: 1 online resource (x, 210 pages) : , digital, PDF file(s).
    ISBN: 9781139059527 (ebook)
    Content: This comparative analysis of the constitutional law of religion-state relations in the United States and Germany focuses on the principle of state neutrality. A strong emphasis on state neutrality, a notoriously ambiguous concept, is a shared feature in the constitutional jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court, but neutrality does not have the same meaning in both systems. In Germany neutrality tends to indicate more distance between church and state, whereas the opposite is the case in the United States. Neutrality also has other meanings in both systems, making straightforward comparison more difficult than it might seem. Although the underlying trajectory of neutrality is different in both countries, the discussion of neutrality breaks down into largely parallel themes. By examining those themes in a comparative perspective, the meaning of state neutrality in religion-state relations can be delineated.
    Note: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). , Part I. The Comparative Approach: 1. The past and present of comparative constitutional studies; 2. The culture wars, American exceptionalism, and a comparative analysis of religion-state relations; 3. Employing a comparative approach -- Part II. Religion-State Relations and the Role of Neutrality: 4. Toward neutrality; 5. The role of history; 6. The roots of neutrality; 7. Delineating neutrality -- Conclusion: the future of neutrality in comparative perspective.
    Additional Edition: Print version: ISBN 9781107015821
    Language: English
    Subjects: Law
    RVK:
    Keywords: Electronic books
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Book
    Book
    Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press
    UID:
    gbv_668964839
    Format: X, 210 S. , 24 cm
    Edition: 1. publ.
    ISBN: 9781107015821 , 1107015820
    Content: "This comparative analysis of the constitutional law of religion-state relations in the United States and Germany focuses on the principle of state neutrality. A strong emphasis on state neutrality, a notoriously ambiguous concept, is a shared feature in the constitutional jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court, but neutrality does not have the same meaning in both systems. In Germany neutrality tends to indicate more distance between church and state, whereas the opposite is the case in the United States. Neutrality also has other meanings in both systems, making straightforward comparison more difficult than it might seem. Although the underlying trajectory of neutrality is different in both countries, the discussion of neutrality breaks down into largely parallel themes. By examining those themes in a comparative perspective, the meaning of state neutrality in religion-state relations can be delineated"--
    Content: "This comparative analysis of the constitutional law of religion-state relations in the United States and Germany focuses on the principle of state neutrality. A strong emphasis on state neutrality, a notoriously ambiguous concept, is a shared feature in the constitutional jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court, but neutrality does not have the same meaning in both systems. In Germany neutrality tends to indicate more distance between church and state, whereas the opposite is the case in the United States. Neutrality also has other meanings in both systems, making straightforward comparison more difficult than it might seem. Although the underlying trajectory of neutrality is different in both countries, the discussion of neutrality breaks down into largely parallel themes. By examining those themes in a comparative perspective, the meaning of state neutrality in religion-state relations can be delineated"--
    Note: Formerly CIP Uk , Teilw. zugl.: Köln, Univ., Diss. , Machine generated contents note: Part I. The Comparative Approach: 1. The past and present of comparative constitutional studies; 2. The culture wars, American exceptionalism, and a comparative analysis of religion-state relations; 3. Employing a comparative approach; Part II. Religion-State Relations and the Role of Neutrality: 4. Toward neutrality; 5. The role of history; 6. The roots of neutrality; 7. Delineating neutrality; 8. Conclusion: the future of neutrality in comparative perspective.
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Haupt, Claudia E. Religion-state relations in the United States and Germany Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012 ISBN 9781139059527
    Language: English
    Subjects: Law
    RVK:
    Keywords: Deutschland ; USA ; Verfassungsrecht ; Neutralität ; Religionsfreiheit ; Rechtsvergleich ; USA ; Deutschland ; Religion ; Staat ; Rechtsvergleich ; Hochschulschrift
    Author information: Haupt, Claudia E.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Cambridge ; : Cambridge University Press,
    UID:
    edocfu_9959232681402883
    Format: 1 online resource (x, 210 pages) : , digital, PDF file(s).
    ISBN: 1-107-23029-2 , 1-139-21007-6 , 1-280-48539-6 , 9786613580375 , 1-139-22304-6 , 1-139-21824-7 , 1-139-21515-9 , 1-139-22476-X , 1-139-22133-7 , 1-139-05952-1
    Content: This comparative analysis of the constitutional law of religion-state relations in the United States and Germany focuses on the principle of state neutrality. A strong emphasis on state neutrality, a notoriously ambiguous concept, is a shared feature in the constitutional jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court, but neutrality does not have the same meaning in both systems. In Germany neutrality tends to indicate more distance between church and state, whereas the opposite is the case in the United States. Neutrality also has other meanings in both systems, making straightforward comparison more difficult than it might seem. Although the underlying trajectory of neutrality is different in both countries, the discussion of neutrality breaks down into largely parallel themes. By examining those themes in a comparative perspective, the meaning of state neutrality in religion-state relations can be delineated.
    Note: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). , Part I. The Comparative Approach: 1. The past and present of comparative constitutional studies; 2. The culture wars, American exceptionalism, and a comparative analysis of religion-state relations; 3. Employing a comparative approach -- Part II. Religion-State Relations and the Role of Neutrality: 4. Toward neutrality; 5. The role of history; 6. The roots of neutrality; 7. Delineating neutrality -- Conclusion: the future of neutrality in comparative perspective. , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 1-107-01582-0
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Did you mean 1107005825?
Did you mean 1107018870?
Did you mean 1107005620?
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages