X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Language
Region
Library
Years
Person/Organisation
Subjects(RVK)
Keywords
Access
  • 1
    Book
    Book
    Linguistic purism in action : how auxiliary "tun" was stigmatized in early new high German (2001)
    Berlin [u.a.] :Gruyter,
    Details
    UID:
    almahu_BV013833020
    Format: X, 312 S. : graph. Darst.
    ISBN: 978-3-11-017024-5 , 3-11-017024-8
    Series Statement: Studia linguistica Germanica 60
    Note: Zugl.: Newcastle upon Tyne, Univ., Diss., 2000
    Language: English
    Subjects: German Studies
    RVK:
    GC 4672
    RVK:
    GB 6521
    RVK:
    GC 4983
    Keywords: Frühneuhochdeutsch ; Verb ; tun ; Hochschulschrift ; Hochschulschrift ; Hochschulschrift
    URL: http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009461265&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
    URL: http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=009461265&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
    URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis
    Author information: Langer, Nils 1969-
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Book
    Stabi Berlin get availability status
    HU Berlin get availability status
    FU Berlin get availability status
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Linguistic Purism in Action : How auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German (2001)
    Berlin : De Gruyter
    Details
    UID:
    gbv_1659434742
    Format: Online-Ressource (X, 312 S.)
    Edition: 2001
    ISBN: 9783110881103
    Series Statement: Studia Linguistica Germanica 60
    Content: Biographical note: Der Autor hat an der Universität Newcastle upon Tyne promoviert und ist jetzt Dozent für Germanistik an der Universität zu Bristol.
    Content: Biographical note: The author received his doctorate at the University of Tyne and now teaches German Studies at the University of Bristol.
    Content: Anhand der Geschichte des Hilfsverbs tun (Susanne tut gern Kuchen essen) seit 1350 wird gezeigt, dass präskriptive Grammatiker im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert aktiv in den Standardisierungesprozess eingegriffen haben, um gewisse morphosyntaktische Konstruktionen von der Prestigesprache "Standarddeutsch" fernzuhalten.
    Content: The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect.
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783110170245
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Langer, Nils, 1969 - Linguistic purism in action Berlin : de Gruyter, 2001 ISBN 9783110170245
    Additional Edition: ISBN 3110170248
    Language: English
    Subjects: German Studies
    RVK:
    GC 4672
    Keywords: Frühneuhochdeutsch ; Verb ; tun
    DOI: 10.1515/9783110881103
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    URL: lizenzpflichtig
    URL: Cover
    URL: Cover
    Author information: Langer, Nils 1969-
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Online Access
    Open Access Request
    UB Potsdam
  • 3
    Book
    Book
    Linguistic purism in action : how auxiliary "tun" was stigmatized in early new high German (2001)
    Berlin [u.a.] : Gruyter
    Details
    UID:
    b3kat_BV013833020
    Format: X, 312 S. , graph. Darst.
    ISBN: 9783110170245 , 3110170248
    Series Statement: Studia linguistica Germanica 60
    Note: Zugl.: Newcastle upon Tyne, Univ., Diss., 2000
    Language: English
    Subjects: German Studies
    RVK:
    GB 6521
    RVK:
    GC 4672
    RVK:
    GC 4983
    Keywords: Frühneuhochdeutsch ; Verb ; tun ; Hochschulschrift
    URL: Inhaltsverzeichnis
    Author information: Langer, Nils 1969-
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Book
    TU Berlin get availability status
  • 4
    Book
    Book
    Linguistic purism in action : how auxiliary "tun" was stigmatized in Early New High German (2001)
    Berlin [u.a.] : Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
    Details
    UID:
    kobvindex_ZLB13351416
    Format: X, 312 Seiten , 24 cm
    ISBN: 3110170248
    Series Statement: Studia linguistica Germanica 60
    Language: English
    Keywords: Frühneuhochdeutsch ; Verb ; tun
    Author information: Langer, Nils
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Book
    Berlin VÖBB/ZLB get availability status
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Linguistic purism in action : how auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German (2001)
    Berlin ; : Walter de Gruyter,
    Details
    UID:
    almahu_9948323118402882
    Format: 1 online resource (324 pages)
    ISBN: 9783110881103 (e-book)
    Series Statement: Studia linguistica Germanica ;
    Note: Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2000.
    Additional Edition: Print version: Langer, Nils,1969- Linguistic purism in action : how auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German. Berlin ; New York : Walter de Gruyter, 2001 ISBN 9783110170245
    Language: English
    Keywords: Electronic books.
    URL: Click to View
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    HU Berlin
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Linguistic Purism in Action : How auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German (2001)
    Berlin/Boston :De Gruyter,
    Details
    UID:
    edocfu_9958355180302883
    Format: 1 online resource(x,312p.) : , illustrations.
    Edition: Electronic reproduction. Berlin/Boston : De Gruyter, 2001. Mode of access: World Wide Web.
    Edition: System requirements: Web browser.
    Edition: Access may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
    ISBN: 9783110881103
    Series Statement: Studia Linguistica Germanica; 60
    Content: The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect.
    Note: Frontmatter -- , Table of Content -- , Acknowledgements -- , Abbreviations -- , 1. Introduction -- , 2. Part I. The Distribution of Auxiliary Tun -- , 3. Part II. The Stigmatization of Auxiliary Tun -- , 4. Conclusion -- , 5. Appendix: Data and Bibliographies. , Also available in print edition. , In English.
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783110170245
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783111776668
    Language: English
    DOI: 10.1515/9783110881103
    URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110881103
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Open Access Request
    FU Berlin
  • 7
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Linguistic purism in action : how auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German (2001)
    Berlin ; : Walter de Gruyter,
    Details
    UID:
    edocfu_9959229259002883
    Format: 1 online resource (324 pages)
    Edition: Reprint 2013
    ISBN: 3-11-088110-1
    Series Statement: Studia Linguistica Germanica ; 60
    Content: Anhand der Geschichte des Hilfsverbs tun (Susanne tut gern Kuchen essen) seit 1350 wird gezeigt, dass präskriptive Grammatiker im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert aktiv in den Standardisierungesprozess eingegriffen haben, um gewisse morphosyntaktische Konstruktionen von der Prestigesprache "Standarddeutsch" fernzuhalten.
    Content: The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect.
    Note: Originally presented as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2000. , Front matter -- , Table of Content -- , Acknowledgements -- , Abbreviations -- , 1. Introduction -- , 2. Part I. The Distribution of Auxiliary Tun -- , 3. Part II. The Stigmatization of Auxiliary Tun -- , 4. Conclusion -- , 5. Appendix: Data and Bibliographies , Issued also in print. , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 3-11-177666-2
    Additional Edition: ISBN 3-11-017024-8
    Language: English
    DOI: 10.1515/9783110881103
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Open Access Request
    FU Berlin
  • 8
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Linguistic Purism in Action : How auxiliary tun was stigmatized in Early New High German (2013)
    Berlin ; : De Gruyter,
    Details
    UID:
    almahu_9949481505902882
    Format: 1 online resource (312 p.) : , Zahlr. Abb.
    Edition: Reprint 2013
    ISBN: 9783110881103 , 9783110238570
    Series Statement: Studia Linguistica Germanica , 60
    Content: Anhand der Geschichte des Hilfsverbs tun (Susanne tut gern Kuchen essen) seit 1350 wird gezeigt, dass präskriptive Grammatiker im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert aktiv in den Standardisierungesprozess eingegriffen haben, um gewisse morphosyntaktische Konstruktionen von der Prestigesprache "Standarddeutsch" fernzuhalten.
    Content: The auxiliary do (tun) is one of the most-discussed constructions in West Germanic. In German, there is a striking opposition between modern standard German, where the construction is virtually ungrammatical and considered to be "sub-standard" by most speakers, whilst, as this book shows, the construction is attested in all modern dialects as well as historic stages since 1350. In answering why auxiliary tun is ungrammatical in modern standard German, it is shown that the stigmatization of tun was caused by prescriptive grammarians in the 16th-18th century. Furthermore it is shown that the stigmatization of tun as "bad" German occurred in clearly discernible stages, from bad poetry (1550-1680), to bad written German (1680-1740) and finally to "bad" German in general (after 1740), thus providing evidence that the history of the standardization of German needs to take into account direct metalinguistic comments from prescriptive grammarians. The effectiveness of linguistic purism is also shown by evidence from two other constructions, namely polynegation and double perfect.
    Note: Frontmatter -- , Table of Content -- , Acknowledgements -- , Abbreviations -- , 1. Introduction -- , 2. Part I. The Distribution of Auxiliary Tun -- , 3. Part II. The Stigmatization of Auxiliary Tun -- , 4. Conclusion -- , 5. Appendix: Data and Bibliographies , Issued also in print. , Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. , In English.
    In: DGBA Backlist Complete English Language 2000-2014 PART1, De Gruyter, 9783110238570
    In: DGBA Backlist Linguistics and Semiotics 2000-2014 (EN), De Gruyter, 9783110238457
    In: DGBA Linguistics and Semiotics 2000 - 2014, De Gruyter, 9783110636970
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783110170245
    Language: English
    DOI: 10.1515/9783110881103
    URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110881103
    URL: https://www.degruyter.com/isbn/9783110881103
    URL: Cover
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Online Resource
    Open Access Request
    HU Berlin
Nothing or not found what you are looking for? Please check your search query or use the Interlibrary Loan Search.
Did you mean 3100170245?
Did you mean 3110100428?
Did you mean 3110110148?
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages