Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Language
Region
Years
Person/Organisation
  • 1
    UID:
    almahu_BV035278700
    Format: VI, 356 S. : , graph. Darst.
    ISBN: 90-420-0856-3
    Series Statement: Utrecht studies in language and communication 17
    Language: English
    Subjects: Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Niederländisch ; Deutsch ; Französisch ; Kausalsatz
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    UID:
    almafu_BV026423811
    Format: VI, 356 S. : , graph. Darst.
    ISBN: 90-420-0856-3
    Series Statement: Utrecht Studies in language en communication 17
    Note: Zugl.: Utrecht, Univ., Diss.
    Language: English
    Subjects: Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures
    RVK:
    Keywords: Hochschulschrift
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    UID:
    almahu_9949703812102882
    Format: 1 online resource.
    ISBN: 9789004458567 , 9789042008564
    Series Statement: Brill Book Archive Part 1, ISBN: 9789004472495 17
    Content: The Dutch, German and French languages display a variety of regularly used connectives all of which introduce causes, arguments or reasons, such as Dutch omdat, want and aangezien, German weil, denn and da , and French parce que, car and puisque. Why should languages have different connectives to express the notion of backward causality? The central argument developed in this book is that different connectives express different degrees of subjectivity. In a series of corpus analyses it is shown that the degree of subjectivity of the main participant involved in the causal relation strongly predicts the occurrence of one or another connective. Hence, language users have at their disposal connectives of varying degrees of subjectivity. In an analysis of judiciary sentences, it is revealed that speakers are actually sensitive of this semantic distinction, and sometimes even exploit it for their communicative purposes: in order to conceal their subjective involvement, judges prefer objective over subjective connectives. This volume makes a contribution to the study of language in use, by applying empirical methods to authentic language data. It will be of interest to anyone concerned with discourse coherence, perspective and subjectivity, corpus linguistics and cross-linguistic analyses.
    Note: Acknowledgements -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- Chapter 2 Causal connectives: different perspectives -- Chapter 3 Subjectivity -- Chapter 4 Subjectivity and Dutch backward causal connectives -- Chapter 5 A crosslinguistic study -- Chapter 6 Connectives and meanings -- References -- Index of names -- Appendices.
    Additional Edition: Print version: How to express yourself with a causal connective : Subjectivity and causal connectives in Dutch, German and French. Leiden ; Boston : BRILL, 2003 ISBN 9789042008564
    Language: English
    URL: DOI:
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    UID:
    gbv_1806488574
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource
    ISBN: 9789004458567 , 9789042008564
    Series Statement: Brill Book Archive Part 1, ISBN: 9789004472495 17
    Content: The Dutch, German and French languages display a variety of regularly used connectives all of which introduce causes, arguments or reasons, such as Dutch omdat, want and aangezien, German weil, denn and da , and French parce que, car and puisque. Why should languages have different connectives to express the notion of backward causality? The central argument developed in this book is that different connectives express different degrees of subjectivity. In a series of corpus analyses it is shown that the degree of subjectivity of the main participant involved in the causal relation strongly predicts the occurrence of one or another connective. Hence, language users have at their disposal connectives of varying degrees of subjectivity. In an analysis of judiciary sentences, it is revealed that speakers are actually sensitive of this semantic distinction, and sometimes even exploit it for their communicative purposes: in order to conceal their subjective involvement, judges prefer objective over subjective connectives. This volume makes a contribution to the study of language in use, by applying empirical methods to authentic language data. It will be of interest to anyone concerned with discourse coherence, perspective and subjectivity, corpus linguistics and cross-linguistic analyses
    Note: Includes bibliographical references and index , Acknowledgements -- Chapter 1 Introduction -- Chapter 2 Causal connectives: different perspectives -- Chapter 3 Subjectivity -- Chapter 4 Subjectivity and Dutch backward causal connectives -- Chapter 5 A crosslinguistic study -- Chapter 6 Connectives and meanings -- References -- Index of names -- Appendices.
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe How to express yourself with a causal connective : Subjectivity and causal connectives in Dutch, German and French Leiden : BRILL, 2003 ISBN 9789042008564
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Did you mean 9042008504?
Did you mean 9042005637?
Did you mean 9042008083?
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages