Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Medientyp
Sprache
Region
Bibliothek
Erscheinungszeitraum
Person/Organisation
Zugriff
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    New Haven : Yale University Press
    UID:
    gbv_1003748597
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (x, 302 pages)
    Ausgabe: Online-Ausg.
    ISBN: 0300070187 , 0300146566 , 9780300070187 , 9780300146561
    Inhalt: It has long been assumed that throughout the history of the United States, the role of judges was limited to adjudicating cases and did not include performing other official functions for the executive and legislative branches of government. This book challenges that assumption, investigating the variety of duties judges performed until the end of the eighteenth century and exploring why a new separation of powers developed only after 1793
    Inhalt: Jay thus offers a revisionary account of the 1793 political-legal crisis, a landmark event in the formation of the American judiciary and the doctrine of separation of powers
    Inhalt: Stewart Jay shows that early judges in both the United States and Great Britain provided extrajudicial advisory opinions to the executive, took administrative assignments, assisted in legislative drafting, and even held offices in other branches of government. In 1793, however, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to answer the Washington administration's request for legal advice on American treaty relations with France. Jay argues that if we take into consideration late eighteenth-century theories of separation of powers and the probable intent of the Framers of the Constitution, no significant constitutional barriers prevented the Court from answering Washington's questions. The actual reasons for the Court's refusal were related to the practical consequences that would result if the Justices issued a formal advisory opinion during a foreign policy crisis. Similarly, says Jay, British judges of the same period also abandoned advisory opinions owing to pragmatic concerns
    Inhalt: 1. The Advisory Role of Judges in Great Britain Through the Eighteenth Century -- 2. The Advisory Role of American Judges Prior to 1787 -- 3. The Advisory Role of Judges During the Formation of the U.S. Constitution -- 4. The Advisory Role of Judges During the Washington Administration -- 5. Declining Washington's Request: The Events of 1793 -- 6. Explaining the Supreme Court's Refusal to Assist the Washington Administration -- App. Letter from the Justices of the Supreme Court to President George Washington
    Anmerkung: Includes bibliographical references and index , English
    Weitere Ausg.: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Jay, Stewart Most humble servants
    Sprache: Englisch
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Meinten Sie 9780300146516?
Meinten Sie 9780300106565?
Meinten Sie 9780300124651?
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz