Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    UID:
    almahu_9949767518102882
    Format: 1 online resource (396 pages) : , illustrations
    Note: Includes index.
    Additional Edition: Print version: What Obergefell v. Hodges should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's same-sex marriage decision. New Haven, Connecticut ; London, England : Yale University Press, c2020 ISBN 9780300221558
    Language: English
    Keywords: Electronic books.
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    UID:
    gbv_1727355229
    Format: xiv, 381 Seiten
    ISBN: 9780300221558
    Content: "What makes a Supreme Court decision a landmark? It has to have an immediate and profound effect on some aspect of people's daily lives, and it has to raise constitutional and political issues that go far beyond the immediate questions before the Court. Brown v. Board of Education was such a decision for the 1950s, and Roe v. Wade for the 1970s. It is already clear to constitutional scholars that Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage throughout the country, is such a case for our era. Yet the majority opinion, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, satisfies hardly anyone. In this book, Jack Balkin has recruited thirteen leading scholars to serve as pretend Supreme Court justices, and together with himself as Chief Justice, they have produced twelve opinions that reflect, as the title has it, what the Court should have said. Including a majority opinion that is a masterpiece of doctrinal clarity, plus a range of both concurring and dissenting opinions, What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said is a brilliant exploration of constitutional paths not taken. It will make compelling reading for constitutional scholars, students, those interested in the issues surrounding same-sex marriage, and anyone with an interest in constitutional reasoning at the highest level"--
    Note: Literaturverzeichnis Seite 333-341 , Hinweise zur Konferenz auf der Seite X , Obergefell v. Hodges kursiv geschrieben
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Balkin, Jack M. What Obergefell V. Hodges Should Have Said New Haven : Yale University Press, 2020 ISBN 9780300255782
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Balkin, Jack M., 1956 - What Obergefell v. Hodges should have said New Haven : Yale University Press, 2020 ISBN 9780300255782
    Language: English
    Keywords: USA Supreme Court ; Anerkennung ; Gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe ; Geschichte 2015 ; Konferenzschrift
    Author information: Balkin, Jack M. 1956-
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    UID:
    edocfu_9961448831802883
    Format: 1 online resource (320 p.)
    ISBN: 0-300-25578-0
    Series Statement: Yale scholarship online
    Content: Rewriting the Supreme Court's landmark gay rights decision Jack Balkin and an all-star cast of legal scholars, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. In eleven incisive opinions, the authors offer the best constitutional arguments for and against the right to same-sex marriage, and debate what Obergefell should mean for the future. In addition to serving as Chief Justice of this imaginary court, Balkin provides a critical introduction to the case. He recounts the story of the gay rights litigation that led to Obergefell, and he explains how courts respond to political mobilizations for new rights claims.
    Note: Includes index. , Frontmatter -- , Contents -- , Preface -- , PART I OBERGEFELL V. HODGES: A CRITICAL INTRODUCTION -- , 1. The Long and Winding Road to Marriage Equality -- , 2. A Player, Not a Mirror; A Catalyst, Not a Brick Wall -- , 3. Rewriting Obergefell: A Guide to the Opinions -- , PART II REVISED OPINIONS IN OBERGEFELL V. HODGES -- , Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court) -- , Douglas NeJaime and Reva B. Siegel (concurring) -- , Andrew Koppelman (concurring) -- , Catherine Smith (concurring) -- , William N. Eskridge Jr. (concurring in the judgment) -- , Katherine Franke (concurring in the judgment) -- , Melissa Murray (concurring) -- , Sherif Girgis and Robert P. George (dissenting) -- , Helen M. Alvaré (dissenting) -- , John C. Harrison (dissenting) -- , Jeremy Waldron (dissenting) -- , Comments from the Contributors -- , Appendix: Th e Constitution of the United States of America: Selected Provisions -- , Obergefell v. Hodges: A Selected Bibliography -- , About the Contributors -- , Acknowledgments -- , Table of Cases -- , Index , In English.
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-300-22155-X
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    UID:
    almafu_9961448831802883
    Format: 1 online resource (320 p.)
    ISBN: 0-300-25578-0
    Series Statement: Yale scholarship online
    Content: Rewriting the Supreme Court's landmark gay rights decision Jack Balkin and an all-star cast of legal scholars, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry. In eleven incisive opinions, the authors offer the best constitutional arguments for and against the right to same-sex marriage, and debate what Obergefell should mean for the future. In addition to serving as Chief Justice of this imaginary court, Balkin provides a critical introduction to the case. He recounts the story of the gay rights litigation that led to Obergefell, and he explains how courts respond to political mobilizations for new rights claims.
    Note: Includes index. , Frontmatter -- , Contents -- , Preface -- , PART I OBERGEFELL V. HODGES: A CRITICAL INTRODUCTION -- , 1. The Long and Winding Road to Marriage Equality -- , 2. A Player, Not a Mirror; A Catalyst, Not a Brick Wall -- , 3. Rewriting Obergefell: A Guide to the Opinions -- , PART II REVISED OPINIONS IN OBERGEFELL V. HODGES -- , Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court) -- , Douglas NeJaime and Reva B. Siegel (concurring) -- , Andrew Koppelman (concurring) -- , Catherine Smith (concurring) -- , William N. Eskridge Jr. (concurring in the judgment) -- , Katherine Franke (concurring in the judgment) -- , Melissa Murray (concurring) -- , Sherif Girgis and Robert P. George (dissenting) -- , Helen M. Alvaré (dissenting) -- , John C. Harrison (dissenting) -- , Jeremy Waldron (dissenting) -- , Comments from the Contributors -- , Appendix: Th e Constitution of the United States of America: Selected Provisions -- , Obergefell v. Hodges: A Selected Bibliography -- , About the Contributors -- , Acknowledgments -- , Table of Cases -- , Index , In English.
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-300-22155-X
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Did you mean 9780300220858?
Did you mean 9780300221398?
Did you mean 9780300221428?
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages