Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Type of Medium
Language
Region
Library
Years
Person/Organisation
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berkeley, CA :University of California Press,
    UID:
    edocfu_9958102623702883
    Format: 1 online resource (363 p.)
    ISBN: 1-282-35497-3 , 9786612354977 , 0-520-91396-5 , 0-585-29941-2
    Content: Shrader-Frechette looks at current U.S. government policy regarding the nation's high-level radioactive waste both scientifically and ethically. What should be done with our nation's high-level radioactive waste, which will remain hazardous for thousands of years? This is one of the most pressing problems faced by the nuclear power industry, and current U.S. government policy is to bury "radwastes" in specially designed deep repositories. K. S. Shrader-Frechette argues that this policy is profoundly misguided on both scientific and ethical grounds. Scientifically-because we cannot trust the precision of 10,000-year predictions that promise containment of the waste. Ethically-because geological disposal ignores the rights of present and future generations to equal treatment, due process, and free informed consent. Shrader-Frechette focuses her argument on the world's first proposed high-level radioactive waste facility at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Analyzing a mass of technical literature, she demonstrates the weaknesses in the professional risk-assessors' arguments that claim the site is sufficiently safe for such a plan. We should postpone the question of geological disposal for at least a century and use monitored, retrievable, above-ground storage of the waste until then. Her message regarding radwaste is clear: what you can't see can hurt you.
    Note: Includes index. , Front matter -- , Contents -- , Acknowledgments -- , Preface -- , 1. The Riddle of Nuclear Waste -- , 2. Understanding the Origins of the Problem -- , 3. Reliance on Value Judgments in Repository Risk Assessment -- , 4. Subjective Estimates of Repository Risks -- , 5. Subjective Evaluations of Repository Risks -- , 6. Problematic Inferences in in Assessing Repository Risks -- , 7. Uncertainty: An Obstacle to Geological Disposal -- , 8. Equity: An Obstacle to Geological Disposal -- , 9. .An Alternative to Permanent Geological Disposal -- , Notes -- , Index of Names -- , Index of Subjects , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-520-08244-3
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-520-08301-6
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berkeley, CA :University of California Press,
    UID:
    edoccha_9958102623702883
    Format: 1 online resource (363 p.)
    ISBN: 1-282-35497-3 , 9786612354977 , 0-520-91396-5 , 0-585-29941-2
    Content: Shrader-Frechette looks at current U.S. government policy regarding the nation's high-level radioactive waste both scientifically and ethically. What should be done with our nation's high-level radioactive waste, which will remain hazardous for thousands of years? This is one of the most pressing problems faced by the nuclear power industry, and current U.S. government policy is to bury "radwastes" in specially designed deep repositories. K. S. Shrader-Frechette argues that this policy is profoundly misguided on both scientific and ethical grounds. Scientifically-because we cannot trust the precision of 10,000-year predictions that promise containment of the waste. Ethically-because geological disposal ignores the rights of present and future generations to equal treatment, due process, and free informed consent. Shrader-Frechette focuses her argument on the world's first proposed high-level radioactive waste facility at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Analyzing a mass of technical literature, she demonstrates the weaknesses in the professional risk-assessors' arguments that claim the site is sufficiently safe for such a plan. We should postpone the question of geological disposal for at least a century and use monitored, retrievable, above-ground storage of the waste until then. Her message regarding radwaste is clear: what you can't see can hurt you.
    Note: Includes index. , Front matter -- , Contents -- , Acknowledgments -- , Preface -- , 1. The Riddle of Nuclear Waste -- , 2. Understanding the Origins of the Problem -- , 3. Reliance on Value Judgments in Repository Risk Assessment -- , 4. Subjective Estimates of Repository Risks -- , 5. Subjective Evaluations of Repository Risks -- , 6. Problematic Inferences in in Assessing Repository Risks -- , 7. Uncertainty: An Obstacle to Geological Disposal -- , 8. Equity: An Obstacle to Geological Disposal -- , 9. .An Alternative to Permanent Geological Disposal -- , Notes -- , Index of Names -- , Index of Subjects , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-520-08244-3
    Additional Edition: ISBN 0-520-08301-6
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Did you mean 9780520913165?
Did you mean 9780520913127?
Did you mean 9780520913462?
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages