UID:
edocfu_9959233336702883
Format:
1 online resource (267 p.)
Edition:
With a New afterword by the authors
ISBN:
9786613310439
,
1-4008-4145-3
,
1-283-31043-0
Content:
America's debate over whether and how to invade Iraq clustered into civilian versus military camps. Top military officials appeared reluctant to use force, the most hawkish voices in government were civilians who had not served in uniform, and everyone was worried that the American public would not tolerate casualties in war. This book shows that this civilian-military argument--which has characterized earlier debates over Bosnia, Somalia, and Kosovo--is typical, not exceptional. Indeed, the underlying pattern has shaped U.S. foreign policy at least since 1816. The new afterword by Peter Feaver and Christopher Gelpi traces these themes through the first two years of the current Iraq war, showing how civil-military debates and concerns about sensitivity to casualties continue to shape American foreign policy in profound ways.
Note:
First paperback printing.
,
Frontmatter --
,
Contents --
,
Figures and Tables --
,
Preface --
,
Chapter One. Introduction --
,
Chapter Two. The Civil-Military Opinion Gap Over the Use of Force --
,
Chapter Three. The Impact of Elite Veterans on American Decisions to Use Force --
,
Chapter Four. Casualty Sensitivity and Civil-Military Relations --
,
Chapter Five. Exploring the Determinants of Casualty Sensitivity --
,
Chapter Six. Conclusion --
,
References --
,
Afterword --
,
Name Index --
,
Subject Index
,
Issued also in print.
,
English
Additional Edition:
ISBN 0-691-12427-2
Additional Edition:
ISBN 0-691-11584-2
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1515/9781400841455
Bookmarklink
