Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Medientyp
Sprache
Region
Erscheinungszeitraum
Person/Organisation
Fachgebiete(RVK)
Zugriff
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    New York :New York University Press,
    UID:
    almafu_9958075031502883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (253 p.)
    Ausgabe: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 0-8147-2290-3 , 0-585-47187-8
    Inhalt: Frederick Douglass and George Fitzhugh disagreed on virtually every major issue of the day. On slavery, women's rights, and the preservation of the Union their opinions were diametrically opposed. Where Douglass thundered against the evils of slavery, Fitzhugh counted its many alleged blessings in ways that would make modern readers cringe. What then could the leading abolitionist of the day and the most prominent southern proslavery intellectual possibly have in common? According to David F. Ericson, the answer is as surprising as it is simple; liberalism. In The Debate Over Slavery David F. Ericson makes the controversial argument that despite their many ostensible differences, most Northern abolitionists and Southern defenders of slavery shared many common commitments: to liberal principles; to the nation; to the nation's special mission in history; and to secular progress. He analyzes, side-by-side, pro and antislavery thinkers such as Lydia Marie Child, Frederick Douglass, Wendell Phillips, Thomas R. Dew, and James Fitzhugh to demonstrate the links between their very different ideas and to show how, operating from liberal principles, they came to such radically different conclusions. His raises disturbing questions about liberalism that historians, philosophers, and political scientists cannot afford to ignore.
    Anmerkung: Description based upon print version of record. , Front matter -- , Contents -- , Acknowledgments -- , 1. The Liberal Consensus Thesis and Slavery -- , 2. The Antislavery and Proslavery Arguments -- , 3. Child, Douglass, and Antislavery Liberalism -- , 4. Wendell Phillips -- , 5. Dew, Fitzhugh, and Proslavery Liberalism -- , 6. James H. Hammond -- , 7. The “House Divided” and Civil-War Causation -- , Notes -- , Index -- , About the Author , English
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-8147-2213-X
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-8147-2212-1
    Sprache: Englisch
    Fachgebiete: Geschichte
    RVK:
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    New York, NY :New York University Press,
    UID:
    almafu_9959391763702883
    Umfang: 1 online resource
    ISBN: 9780814722909
    Inhalt: Frederick Douglass and George Fitzhugh disagreed on virtually every major issue of the day. On slavery, women's rights, and the preservation of the Union their opinions were diametrically opposed. Where Douglass thundered against the evils of slavery, Fitzhugh counted its many alleged blessings in ways that would make modern readers cringe. What then could the leading abolitionist of the day and the most prominent southern proslavery intellectual possibly have in common? According to David F. Ericson, the answer is as surprising as it is simple; liberalism. In The Debate Over Slavery David F. Ericson makes the controversial argument that despite their many ostensible differences, most Northern abolitionists and Southern defenders of slavery shared many common commitments: to liberal principles; to the nation; to the nation's special mission in history; and to secular progress. He analyzes, side-by-side, pro and antislavery thinkers such as Lydia Marie Child, Frederick Douglass, Wendell Phillips, Thomas R. Dew, and James Fitzhugh to demonstrate the links between their very different ideas and to show how, operating from liberal principles, they came to such radically different conclusions. His raises disturbing questions about liberalism that historians, philosophers, and political scientists cannot afford to ignore.
    Anmerkung: Frontmatter -- , Contents -- , Acknowledgments -- , 1. The Liberal Consensus Thesis and Slavery -- , 2. The Antislavery and Proslavery Arguments -- , 3. Child, Douglass, and Antislavery Liberalism -- , 4. Wendell Phillips -- , 5. Dew, Fitzhugh, and Proslavery Liberalism -- , 6. James H. Hammond -- , 7. The “House Divided” and Civil-War Causation -- , Notes -- , Index -- , About the Author , In English.
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Meinten Sie 9780814722749?
Meinten Sie 9780814722701?
Meinten Sie 9780814722800?
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz