Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Medientyp
Sprache
Region
Erscheinungszeitraum
Person/Organisation
Fachgebiete(RVK)
Schlagwörter
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Abingdon, Oxon ; : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group,
    UID:
    almahu_9949386608902882
    Umfang: 1 online resource
    ISBN: 9781003174349 , 1003174345 , 9781000401219 , 1000401219 , 9781000401240 , 1000401243
    Inhalt: "This book is a collection of key legal decisions affecting Indigenous Australians, which have been re-imagined so as to be inclusive of Indigenous people's stories, historical experience, perspectives and worldviews. In this groundbreaking work, Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars have collaborated to rewrite sixteen key decisions. Spanning from 1889 to 2017, the judgments reflect the trajectory of Indigenous people's engagements with Australian law. The collection includes decisions that laid the foundation for the wrongful application of terra nullius, and the long disavowal of native title. Contributors have also challenged narrow judicial interpretations of native title, which have denied recognition to Indigenous people who suffered the prolonged impacts of dispossession. Exciting new voices have reclaimed Australian law to deliver justice to the Stolen Generations and to families who have experienced institutional and police racism. Contributors have shown how judicial officers can use their power to challenge systemic racism and tell the stories of Indigenous people who have been dehumanized by the criminal justice system. The new judgments are characterised by intersectional perspectives which draw on postcolonial, critical race and whiteness theory. Several scholars have chosen to operate within the parameters of legal doctrine. Some have imagined new truth-telling forums, highlighting the strength and creative resistance of Indigenous people to oppression and exclusion. Others have rejected the possibility that the legal system, that has been integral to settler colonialism, can ever deliver meaningful justice to Indigenous people"--
    Anmerkung: Introduction / Nicole Watson and Heather Douglas -- Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141. Essay : Oscar Monaghan -- Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286. Commentary : Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne. Judgment : Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne -- Walker v NSW (1994) 182 CLR 45. Commentary : Tanya Mitchell and Amanda Porter. Judgment : Amanda Porter and Tanya Mitchell -- Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451. Commentary : Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings. Judgment : Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings -- Members of the Yorta Yorta Abriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58. Commentary : Simon Young. Judgment : Marcelle Burns -- Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claims Group v Commonwealth of Australia (2013) HCA 33. Commentary : Alison Whittaker. Judgment : Virginia Marshall -- Kartinyeri v Commonwealth [1998] HCA 22. Commentary : Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee. Judgment : Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee -- Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge (No. 2) [2002] NSWADTAP -- Commentary : Debbie Bargallie and Jennifer Nielsen. Judgment : Jennifer Nielsen and Debbie Bargallie -- Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103. Commentary : Simon Rice Poem and Note : Alison Whittaker -- Dempsey v Rigg (1914) St R Qld 245. Commentary : Trudie Broderick. Judgment : Nicole Watson -- State of South Australia v Lampard-Trevorrow [2010] SASC 56. Commentary : Terri Libesman. Judgment : Kirsten Gray -- Backford & Backford and Anor (No 2) [2017] FamCAFC 206. Commentary : Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus. Judgment : Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus -- Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43. Commentary : Jonathan Crowe and Dani Larkin. Judgment : Dani Larkin and Jonathan Crowe -- Nona v Barnes [2012] QCA 346. Commentary : Heather Douglas and Heron Loban. Judgment : Heron Loban and Heather Douglas, translation Deenorah Yellub -- Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37. Commentary : Mary Spiers Williams. Judgment : Mary Spiers Williams -- Report of the Inquest into the Death of Miss Dhu (Perth, 16 December 2016). Commentary : Suvendrini Perera. Judgment : Hannah McGlade.
    Weitere Ausg.: Print version: Indigenous legal judgments. London ; New York : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2021 ISBN 9781032004815
    Sprache: Englisch
    Fachgebiete: Rechtswissenschaft
    RVK:
    Schlagwort(e): Electronic books.
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Abingdon, Oxon ; : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group,
    UID:
    edocfu_9961509502502883
    Umfang: 1 online resource
    Ausgabe: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 1-00-317434-5 , 1-000-40124-3 , 1-003-17434-5 , 1-000-40121-9
    Inhalt: "This book is a collection of key legal decisions affecting Indigenous Australians, which have been re-imagined so as to be inclusive of Indigenous people's stories, historical experience, perspectives and worldviews. In this groundbreaking work, Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars have collaborated to rewrite sixteen key decisions. Spanning from 1889 to 2017, the judgments reflect the trajectory of Indigenous people's engagements with Australian law. The collection includes decisions that laid the foundation for the wrongful application of terra nullius, and the long disavowal of native title. Contributors have also challenged narrow judicial interpretations of native title, which have denied recognition to Indigenous people who suffered the prolonged impacts of dispossession. Exciting new voices have reclaimed Australian law to deliver justice to the Stolen Generations and to families who have experienced institutional and police racism. Contributors have shown how judicial officers can use their power to challenge systemic racism and tell the stories of Indigenous people who have been dehumanized by the criminal justice system. The new judgments are characterised by intersectional perspectives which draw on postcolonial, critical race and whiteness theory. Several scholars have chosen to operate within the parameters of legal doctrine. Some have imagined new truth-telling forums, highlighting the strength and creative resistance of Indigenous people to oppression and exclusion. Others have rejected the possibility that the legal system, that has been integral to settler colonialism, can ever deliver meaningful justice to Indigenous people"--
    Anmerkung: Includes index. , Introduction / Nicole Watson and Heather Douglas -- Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141. Essay : Oscar Monaghan -- Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286. Commentary : Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne. Judgment : Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne -- Walker v NSW (1994) 182 CLR 45. Commentary : Tanya Mitchell and Amanda Porter. Judgment : Amanda Porter and Tanya Mitchell -- Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451. Commentary : Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings. Judgment : Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings -- Members of the Yorta Yorta Abriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58. Commentary : Simon Young. Judgment : Marcelle Burns -- Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claims Group v Commonwealth of Australia (2013) HCA 33. Commentary : Alison Whittaker. Judgment : Virginia Marshall -- Kartinyeri v Commonwealth [1998] HCA 22. Commentary : Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee. Judgment : Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee-- , Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge (No. 2) [2002] NSWADTAP -- Commentary : Debbie Bargallie and Jennifer Nielsen. Judgment : Jennifer Nielsen and Debbie Bargallie -- Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103. Commentary : Simon Rice Poem and Note : Alison Whittaker -- Dempsey v Rigg (1914) St R Qld 245. Commentary : Trudie Broderick. Judgment : Nicole Watson -- State of South Australia v Lampard-Trevorrow [2010] SASC 56. Commentary : Terri Libesman. Judgment : Kirsten Gray -- Backford & Backford and Anor (No 2) [2017] FamCAFC 206. Commentary : Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus. Judgment : Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus -- Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43. Commentary : Jonathan Crowe and Dani Larkin. Judgment : Dani Larkin and Jonathan Crowe -- Nona v Barnes [2012] QCA 346. Commentary : Heather Douglas and Heron Loban. Judgment : Heron Loban and Heather Douglas, translation Deenorah Yellub-- , Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37. Commentary : Mary Spiers Williams. Judgment : Mary Spiers Williams -- Report of the Inquest into the Death of Miss Dhu (Perth, 16 December 2016). Commentary : Suvendrini Perera. Judgment : Hannah McGlade.
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-367-46745-3
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 1-03-200481-9
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Abingdon, Oxon ; : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group,
    UID:
    almahu_9949729938902882
    Umfang: 1 online resource
    Ausgabe: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 1-00-317434-5 , 1-000-40124-3 , 1-003-17434-5 , 1-000-40121-9
    Inhalt: "This book is a collection of key legal decisions affecting Indigenous Australians, which have been re-imagined so as to be inclusive of Indigenous people's stories, historical experience, perspectives and worldviews. In this groundbreaking work, Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars have collaborated to rewrite sixteen key decisions. Spanning from 1889 to 2017, the judgments reflect the trajectory of Indigenous people's engagements with Australian law. The collection includes decisions that laid the foundation for the wrongful application of terra nullius, and the long disavowal of native title. Contributors have also challenged narrow judicial interpretations of native title, which have denied recognition to Indigenous people who suffered the prolonged impacts of dispossession. Exciting new voices have reclaimed Australian law to deliver justice to the Stolen Generations and to families who have experienced institutional and police racism. Contributors have shown how judicial officers can use their power to challenge systemic racism and tell the stories of Indigenous people who have been dehumanized by the criminal justice system. The new judgments are characterised by intersectional perspectives which draw on postcolonial, critical race and whiteness theory. Several scholars have chosen to operate within the parameters of legal doctrine. Some have imagined new truth-telling forums, highlighting the strength and creative resistance of Indigenous people to oppression and exclusion. Others have rejected the possibility that the legal system, that has been integral to settler colonialism, can ever deliver meaningful justice to Indigenous people"--
    Anmerkung: Includes index. , Introduction / Nicole Watson and Heather Douglas -- Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141. Essay : Oscar Monaghan -- Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286. Commentary : Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne. Judgment : Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne -- Walker v NSW (1994) 182 CLR 45. Commentary : Tanya Mitchell and Amanda Porter. Judgment : Amanda Porter and Tanya Mitchell -- Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451. Commentary : Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings. Judgment : Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings -- Members of the Yorta Yorta Abriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58. Commentary : Simon Young. Judgment : Marcelle Burns -- Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claims Group v Commonwealth of Australia (2013) HCA 33. Commentary : Alison Whittaker. Judgment : Virginia Marshall -- Kartinyeri v Commonwealth [1998] HCA 22. Commentary : Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee. Judgment : Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee-- , Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge (No. 2) [2002] NSWADTAP -- Commentary : Debbie Bargallie and Jennifer Nielsen. Judgment : Jennifer Nielsen and Debbie Bargallie -- Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103. Commentary : Simon Rice Poem and Note : Alison Whittaker -- Dempsey v Rigg (1914) St R Qld 245. Commentary : Trudie Broderick. Judgment : Nicole Watson -- State of South Australia v Lampard-Trevorrow [2010] SASC 56. Commentary : Terri Libesman. Judgment : Kirsten Gray -- Backford & Backford and Anor (No 2) [2017] FamCAFC 206. Commentary : Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus. Judgment : Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus -- Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43. Commentary : Jonathan Crowe and Dani Larkin. Judgment : Dani Larkin and Jonathan Crowe -- Nona v Barnes [2012] QCA 346. Commentary : Heather Douglas and Heron Loban. Judgment : Heron Loban and Heather Douglas, translation Deenorah Yellub-- , Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37. Commentary : Mary Spiers Williams. Judgment : Mary Spiers Williams -- Report of the Inquest into the Death of Miss Dhu (Perth, 16 December 2016). Commentary : Suvendrini Perera. Judgment : Hannah McGlade.
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-367-46745-3
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 1-03-200481-9
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Abingdon, Oxon ; : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group,
    UID:
    edoccha_9961509502502883
    Umfang: 1 online resource
    Ausgabe: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 1-00-317434-5 , 1-000-40124-3 , 1-003-17434-5 , 1-000-40121-9
    Inhalt: "This book is a collection of key legal decisions affecting Indigenous Australians, which have been re-imagined so as to be inclusive of Indigenous people's stories, historical experience, perspectives and worldviews. In this groundbreaking work, Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars have collaborated to rewrite sixteen key decisions. Spanning from 1889 to 2017, the judgments reflect the trajectory of Indigenous people's engagements with Australian law. The collection includes decisions that laid the foundation for the wrongful application of terra nullius, and the long disavowal of native title. Contributors have also challenged narrow judicial interpretations of native title, which have denied recognition to Indigenous people who suffered the prolonged impacts of dispossession. Exciting new voices have reclaimed Australian law to deliver justice to the Stolen Generations and to families who have experienced institutional and police racism. Contributors have shown how judicial officers can use their power to challenge systemic racism and tell the stories of Indigenous people who have been dehumanized by the criminal justice system. The new judgments are characterised by intersectional perspectives which draw on postcolonial, critical race and whiteness theory. Several scholars have chosen to operate within the parameters of legal doctrine. Some have imagined new truth-telling forums, highlighting the strength and creative resistance of Indigenous people to oppression and exclusion. Others have rejected the possibility that the legal system, that has been integral to settler colonialism, can ever deliver meaningful justice to Indigenous people"--
    Anmerkung: Includes index. , Introduction / Nicole Watson and Heather Douglas -- Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141. Essay : Oscar Monaghan -- Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286. Commentary : Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne. Judgment : Eddie Synot and Roshan de Silva-Wijeyeratne -- Walker v NSW (1994) 182 CLR 45. Commentary : Tanya Mitchell and Amanda Porter. Judgment : Amanda Porter and Tanya Mitchell -- Tickner v Chapman (1995) 57 FCR 451. Commentary : Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings. Judgment : Narelle Bedford and Peter Billings -- Members of the Yorta Yorta Abriginal Community v Victoria [2002] HCA 58. Commentary : Simon Young. Judgment : Marcelle Burns -- Akiba on behalf of the Torres Strait Regional Sea Claims Group v Commonwealth of Australia (2013) HCA 33. Commentary : Alison Whittaker. Judgment : Virginia Marshall -- Kartinyeri v Commonwealth [1998] HCA 22. Commentary : Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee. Judgment : Larissa Behrendt and Taryn Lee-- , Commissioner of Corrective Services v Aldridge (No. 2) [2002] NSWADTAP -- Commentary : Debbie Bargallie and Jennifer Nielsen. Judgment : Jennifer Nielsen and Debbie Bargallie -- Eatock v Bolt [2011] FCA 1103. Commentary : Simon Rice Poem and Note : Alison Whittaker -- Dempsey v Rigg (1914) St R Qld 245. Commentary : Trudie Broderick. Judgment : Nicole Watson -- State of South Australia v Lampard-Trevorrow [2010] SASC 56. Commentary : Terri Libesman. Judgment : Kirsten Gray -- Backford & Backford and Anor (No 2) [2017] FamCAFC 206. Commentary : Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus. Judgment : Keryn Ruska and Zoe Rathus -- Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43. Commentary : Jonathan Crowe and Dani Larkin. Judgment : Dani Larkin and Jonathan Crowe -- Nona v Barnes [2012] QCA 346. Commentary : Heather Douglas and Heron Loban. Judgment : Heron Loban and Heather Douglas, translation Deenorah Yellub-- , Bugmy v R [2013] HCA 37. Commentary : Mary Spiers Williams. Judgment : Mary Spiers Williams -- Report of the Inquest into the Death of Miss Dhu (Perth, 16 December 2016). Commentary : Suvendrini Perera. Judgment : Hannah McGlade.
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-367-46745-3
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 1-03-200481-9
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Meinten Sie 9781000041200?
Meinten Sie 9781000201420?
Meinten Sie 9781000331240?
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz