UID:
almafu_9960117491302883
Umfang:
1 online resource (pages 2457-3113) :
,
digital, PDF file(s).
Ausgabe:
First edition.
ISBN:
9781108129237
,
1108129234
,
9781108126359
,
1108126359
,
9781108123693
,
1108123694
Serie:
World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Reports
Inhalt:
The Dispute Settlement Reports of the World Trade Organization (WTO) include Panel and Appellate Body reports, as well as arbitration awards, in disputes concerning the rights and obligations of WTO members under the provisions of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. These are the WTO authorized and paginated reports in English. An essential addition to the library of all practicing and academic trade lawyers and needed by students worldwide taking courses in international economic or trade law. DSR 2015: Volume 5 reports on India - Measures Concerning the Importation of Certain Agricultural Products (WT/DS430).
Anmerkung:
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 29 Sep 2017).
,
Cover -- Title page -- Half-title -- Copyright information -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- INDIA - MEASURES CONCERNING THE IMPORTATION OF CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS -- Report of the Appellate Body -- ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT -- PANEL EXHIBITS CITED IN THis REPORT -- CASES CITED IN THIS REPORT -- 1. INTRODUCTION -- 2. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTICIPANTS AND THIRD PARTICIPANTS -- 2.1 Claims of Error by India - Appellant -- 2.1.1 Articles 2.2, 5.1, and 5.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.1.2 Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.1.3 Article 6 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.1.4 Article 5.6 and Article 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.1.5 Article 2.3 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.2 Arguments of the United States - Appellee -- 2.2.1 Articles 2.2, 5.1, and 5.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.2.2 Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.2.3 Article 6 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.2.4 Article 5.6 and Article 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.2.5 Article 2.3 of the SPS Agreement -- 2.3 Arguments of the Third Participants -- 2.3.1 Argentina -- 2.3.2 Australia -- 2.3.3 Brazil -- 2.3.4 European Union -- 2.3.5 Japan -- 3. ISSUES RAISED IN THIS APPEAL -- 4. BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW REGARDING THE MEASURES AT ISSUE, AVIAN INFLUENZA, AND THE OIE CODE -- 4.1 The Measures at Issue -- 4.2 Avian Influenza (AI) -- 4.3 The OIE Code -- 5. ANALYSIS OF THE APPELLATE BODY -- 5.1 Articles 2.2, 5.1, and 5.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 5.1.1 The Panel's findings -- 5.1.2 The relationship between Article 2.2, on the one hand, and Articles 5.1 and 5.2, on the other hand -- 5.1.3 Whether the Panel erred in its interpretation and application of Article 2.2 -- 5.1.4 Whether the Panel acted inconsistently with Article 11 of the DSU -- 5.1.5 India's request to complete the legal analysis -- 5.1.6 Conclusion -- 5.2 Articles 3.1 and 3.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 5.2.1 The Panel's findings.
,
5.2.2 Overview of Article 3 -- 5.2.3 Whether the Panel erred under Article 11.2 of the SPS Agreement and Article 13.2 of the DSU in its consultation with the OIE -- 5.2.4 Whether the Panel acted inconsistently with Article 11 of the DSU -- 5.2.5 Conclusion -- 5.3 Article 6 of the SPS Agreement -- 5.3.1 The Panel's findings -- 5.3.2 Overview of Article 6 -- 5.3.3 Whether the Panel erred in its understanding of the relationship between Articles 6.1 and 6.3 -- 5.3.4 Whether the Panel erred in its application of Article 6.2 to India's AI measures -- 5.3.5 Whether the Panel acted inconsistently with Article 11 of the DSU -- 5.3.6 Conclusion -- 5.4 Articles 5.6 and 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 5.4.1 The Panel's findings -- 5.4.2 Overview of Article 5.6 and Article 2.2 -- 5.4.3 Whether the Panel erred under Article 5.6 -- 5.4.3.1 Whether the Panel erred under Article 5.6 in finding that the United States had identified alternative measures that would achieve India's appropriate level of protection -- 5.4.3.2 Whether the Panel erred under Article 5.6 by failing to identify the proposed alternative measures with precision -- 5.4.4 Whether the Panel acted inconsistently with Article 11 of the DSU -- 5.4.5 Conclusion -- 5.5 Article 2.3 of the SPS Agreement -- 5.5.1 The Panel's findings -- 5.5.2 India's claims under Article 11 of the DSU -- 5.5.2.1 Whether the Panel failed to make an objective assessment by setting "terms of reference" for individual experts that were beyond the scope of the OIE Code -- 5.5.2.2 Whether the Panel failed to make an objective assessment by requiring India to prove that LPNAI is exotic to India, instead of requiring the United States, as the complainant, to establish prima facie its allegation that LPNAI should be present in India.
,
5.5.2.3 Whether the Panel acted inconsistently with Article 11 of the DSU by delegating to the experts the factual determination of whether LPNAI is exotic to India -- 5.5.3 Conclusion -- 6. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS -- ANNEX 1 -- Report of the Panel -- LIST OF ANNEXES -- CASES CITED IN THIS REPORT -- ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT -- 1. INTRODUCTION -- 1.1 Complaint by the United States -- 1.2 Panel Establishment and Composition -- 1.3 Panel Proceedings -- 1.3.1 General -- 1.3.2 Additional Working Procedures for the Protection of Strictly Confidential Information (SCI) -- 1.3.3 Preliminary ruling requests -- 1.3.3.1 India's first request for a preliminary ruling -- 1.3.3.2 India's second request for a preliminary ruling -- 1.3.4 Experts' consultation process -- 1.3.4.1 Panel's decision to consult with experts -- 1.3.4.2 Panel's selection of individual experts -- 1.3.4.3 Panel's questions to the OIE and to the individual experts -- 1.3.4.4 Panel's meeting with the experts and the parties -- 2. FACTUAL ASPECTS -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 The Disease at Issue: AI -- 2.2.1 General background -- 2.2.2 Typology -- 2.2.2.1 HPAI -- 2.2.2.2 LPAI -- 2.2.3 AI viruses notifiable to the OIE -- 2.2.4 Transmission of AI -- 2.3 The Measures at Issue -- 2.3.1 Livestock Act -- 2.3.2 S.O. 1663(E) -- 2.4 Factual Context -- 2.4.1 India's notifications of its AI measures to the WTO Secretariat -- 2.4.2 India's other measures affecting importation of agricultural products -- 2.4.2.1 S.O. 655(E) -- 2.4.2.2 Office Memorandum No. 109-21/2007-Trade -- 2.4.3 India's AI measures affecting domestic agricultural products -- 2.4.3.1 The Prevention and Control of Infectious and Contagious Disease in Animals Act 2009 (Prevention of Diseases Act) -- 2.4.3.2 The National Action Plan of 2012 (NAP 2012) -- 2.4.4 Parties' domestic disease situations -- 2.4.4.1 The United States.
,
2.4.4.2 India -- 2.4.5 The Terrestrial Code -- 2.4.5.1 The OIE and its mandate -- 2.4.5.2 History of the Terrestrial Code -- 2.4.5.3 Objectives of the Terrestrial Code -- 2.4.5.4 Structure of the Terrestrial Code -- 3. PARTIES' REQUESTS FOR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- 4. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES -- 5. ARGUMENTS OF THE THIRD PARTIES -- 6. INTERIM REVIEW -- 6.1 The Purpose and Scope of the Interim Review -- 6.2 Factual Aspects -- 6.3 Preliminary Issues -- 6.4 Whether India's AI Measures Are SPS Measures Within the Scope of the SPS Agreement -- 6.5 Whether India's AI Measures Are Inconsistent With Article 3.1 of the SPS Agreement -- 6.6 Whether India's AI Measures Are Inconsistent With Articles 5.1, 5.2 and 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 6.7 Whether India's AI Measures Are Inconsistent With Articles 2.3 and 5.5 of the SPS Agreement -- 6.8 Whether India's AI Measures Are Inconsistent With Article 5.6 and, Consequently, Article 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 6.9 Whether India's AI Measures Are Inconsistent With Articles 6.1 and 6.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 7. FINDINGS -- 7.1 Preliminary Issues -- 7.1.1 First request for a preliminary ruling by India -- 7.1.2 Second request for a preliminary ruling by India -- 7.1.2.1 Introduction -- 7.1.2.2 Arguments of the parties -- 7.1.2.3 Arguments of the third parties -- 7.1.2.4 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.1.2.5 Conclusion -- 7.1.3 Other preliminary issues -- 7.1.3.1 Whether the "related measures" and "implementing measures" mentioned in the panel request are included in the Panel's terms of reference -- 7.1.3.2 Implication of the use of the word "orders" in the plural in the panel request -- 7.2 Order of Analysis -- 7.3 Whether India's AI Measures Are SPS Measures Within the Scope of the SPS Agreement -- 7.3.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.3.1.1 United States -- 7.3.1.2 India -- 7.3.2 Analysis by the Panel.
,
7.3.2.1 Introduction -- 7.3.2.2 The legal provision at issue -- 7.3.2.3 Whether India's AI measures are SPS measures within the definitions provided in Annex A(1) of the SPS Agreement -- 7.3.2.4 Whether India's AI measures directly or indirectly affect international trade -- 7.3.3 Conclusion -- 7.4 Whether India's AI Measures Are Inconsistent With Article 3.1 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.4.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.4.1.1 United States -- 7.4.1.2 India -- 7.4.2 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.4.2.1 Introduction -- 7.4.2.2 The legal provisions at issue -- 7.4.2.3 Whether India's AI measures "conform to" the Terrestrial Code pursuant to Article 3.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.5 Whether India's AI Measures Are Inconsistent With Articles 5.1, 5.2 and 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.5.1 Introduction -- 7.5.2 Relationship between Articles 5.1, 5.2 and 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.5.3 Whether India's AI measures are inconsistent with Articles 5.1 and 5.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.5.3.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.5.3.2 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.5.4 Whether India's AI measures are inconsistent with Article 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.5.4.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.5.4.2 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.5.5 Conclusion on the United States' claims pursuant to Articles 5.1, 5.2 and 2.2 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.6 Whether India's AI Measures Are Inconsistent With Articles 2.3 and 5.5 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.6.1 Introduction -- 7.6.2 Relationship between Articles 2.3 and 5.5 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.6.3 Whether India's AI measures are inconsistent with Article 2.3 of the SPS Agreement -- 7.6.3.1 Arguments of the parties -- 7.6.4 Analysis by the Panel -- 7.6.4.1 Introduction -- 7.6.4.2 The legal provision at issue -- 7.6.5 Conclusion on the United States' claim pursuant to Article 2.3 of the SPS Agreement.
,
7.7 Conclusion on the United States' Alternative Claim Pursuant to Article 5.5 of the SPS Agreement.
Weitere Ausg.:
ISBN 9781107191815
Weitere Ausg.:
ISBN 1107191815
Sprache:
Englisch
Bookmarklink
