Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Medientyp
Sprache
Region
Bibliothek
Erscheinungszeitraum
Schlagwörter
Zugriff
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,
    UID:
    almahu_9948330904002882
    Umfang: 1 online resource (xxxiv, 371 pages) : , digital, PDF file(s).
    ISBN: 9781108348409 (ebook)
    Serie: Feminist judgments series
    Originaltitel: Feminist judgments (Reproductive justice)
    Inhalt: Reproductive justice (RJ) is a pivotal movement that supplants the language and limitations of reproductive rights. RJ's tenets are that women have the human rights to decide if or when they'll become pregnant, whether to carry a pregnancy to term, and to parent the children they have in safe and healthy environments. Recognizing the importance of the rights at stake when the law addresses parenting and procreation, the authors in this book re-imagine judicial opinions that address the law's treatment of pregnancy and parenting. The cases cover topics such as forced sterilization, pregnancy discrimination, criminal penalties for women who take illegal drugs while pregnant, and state funding for abortion. Though some of the re-imagined cases come to the same conclusions as the originals, each rewritten opinion analyzes how these cases impact the most vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities, poor women, and women of color.
    Anmerkung: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Mar 2020). , Part I . Kimberly M. Mutcherson. Introduction -- Using RJ to Rewrite Justice -- The Art of Storytelling -- Feminists, Feminist Theory, and Race -- The Clash of Rights and Justice -- Intertwining Identities and Movements. Part II. The Feminist Judgments. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) -- Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942) -- Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) -- Maher v. Roe, 432 US 464 (1977) -- In Re Madyun, 114 Daily Wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super Ct. 1986) -- Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993) -- Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2000) -- State v. Oakley, 245 Wis. 2d 447 (2001) -- Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dept. of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 -- K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005) -- Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012) -- Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. ---, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013) -- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. (2014) -- Young v. UPS, 575 U.S. (2015) -- Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Weitere Ausg.: Print version: ISBN 9781108425438
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Buch
    Buch
    Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press
    UID:
    gbv_1678511390
    Umfang: xxxiv, 371 Seiten
    ISBN: 9781108442350 , 9781108425438
    Serie: Feminist judgment series
    Originaltitel: Feminist judgments (Reproductive justice)
    Inhalt: Part I . Kimberly M. Mutcherson. Introduction -- Using RJ to Rewrite Justice -- The Art of Storytelling -- Feminists, Feminist Theory, and Race -- The Clash of Rights and Justice -- Intertwining Identities and Movements. Part II. The Feminist Judgments. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) -- Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942) -- Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) -- Maher v. Roe, 432 US 464 (1977) -- In Re Madyun, 114 Daily Wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super Ct. 1986) -- Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993) -- Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2000) -- State v. Oakley, 245 Wis. 2d 447 (2001) -- Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dept. of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 -- K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005) -- Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012) -- Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. ---, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013) -- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. (2014) -- Young v. UPS, 575 U.S. (2015) -- Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Inhalt: "American history is replete with examples of some people controlling reproduction to assert power and domination over others. During chattel slavery in the United States, slaveowners denied Black women and men the most basic forms of dignity---subjecting enslaved Black women to sexual abuse and rape at the whim of people who believed that they could own human beings as property. When pregnancies resulted from rape by slave owners or consensual relationships among slaves, enslaved women frequently watched their children taken from them and sold for profit. Control of fertility and parenting decisions too often meant self-induced abortion or infanticide because other tools were out of reach. Post-emancipation and well into the present day, the experiences of Black women and other women of color, as well as poor women and women living with disabilities, were a reminder that procreation remains a space of power and constraint. The eugenics movement in the United States led to thousands of unconsented sterilization procedures largely on women. Today, parents seek to consent to sterilization on behalf of their adult children living with disabilities. The myth of the welfare queen, always depicted as a poor Black woman with too many children, allowed states to create welfare caps that harm poor children by withholding needed financial resources from their families. States treat pregnant women and new mothers who are living with substance use disorder as criminals who need punishment, rather than sufferers who need a public health response. The federal government makes access to safe and legal abortion more difficult for poor women who are forbidden in almost all instances from using federal Medicaid dollars to pay for pregnancy terminations. It is fitting, then, that this entry into the Feminist Judgments canon focuses on procreation and parenting as sites of oppression and discrimination"--
    Anmerkung: Includes bibliographical references and index
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 9781108348409
    Weitere Ausg.: Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe Feminist judgments (Reproductive justice) Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press, 2020
    Sprache: Englisch
    Schlagwort(e): USA ; Frau ; Fortpflanzung ; Selbstbestimmung ; Menschenrecht
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, USA ; Port Melbourne, Australia ; New Delhi, India ; Singapore :Cambridge University Press,
    UID:
    edocfu_BV046695915
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (xxxiv, 371 Seiten).
    ISBN: 978-1-108-34840-9
    Serie: Feminist judgments series
    Inhalt: Reproductive justice (RJ) is a pivotal movement that supplants the language and limitations of reproductive rights. RJ's tenets are that women have the human rights to decide if or when they'll become pregnant, whether to carry a pregnancy to term, and to parent the children they have in safe and healthy environments. Recognizing the importance of the rights at stake when the law addresses parenting and procreation, the authors in this book re-imagine judicial opinions that address the law's treatment of pregnancy and parenting. The cases cover topics such as forced sterilization, pregnancy discrimination, criminal penalties for women who take illegal drugs while pregnant, and state funding for abortion. Though some of the re-imagined cases come to the same conclusions as the originals, each rewritten opinion analyzes how these cases impact the most vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities, poor women, and women of color
    Weitere Ausg.: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Hardcover ISBN 978-1-10842-543-8
    Weitere Ausg.: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback ISBN 978-1-108-44235-0
    Sprache: Englisch
    Schlagwort(e): Frau ; Fortpflanzung ; Selbstbestimmung ; Menschenrecht
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,
    UID:
    edocfu_9960118477302883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (xxxiv, 371 pages) : , digital, PDF file(s).
    ISBN: 1-108-68610-9 , 1-108-69895-6 , 1-108-34840-8
    Serie: Feminist judgments series
    Originaltitel: Feminist judgments (Reproductive justice)
    Inhalt: Reproductive justice (RJ) is a pivotal movement that supplants the language and limitations of reproductive rights. RJ's tenets are that women have the human rights to decide if or when they'll become pregnant, whether to carry a pregnancy to term, and to parent the children they have in safe and healthy environments. Recognizing the importance of the rights at stake when the law addresses parenting and procreation, the authors in this book re-imagine judicial opinions that address the law's treatment of pregnancy and parenting. The cases cover topics such as forced sterilization, pregnancy discrimination, criminal penalties for women who take illegal drugs while pregnant, and state funding for abortion. Though some of the re-imagined cases come to the same conclusions as the originals, each rewritten opinion analyzes how these cases impact the most vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities, poor women, and women of color.
    Anmerkung: Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Mar 2020). , Part I . Kimberly M. Mutcherson. Introduction -- Using RJ to Rewrite Justice -- The Art of Storytelling -- Feminists, Feminist Theory, and Race -- The Clash of Rights and Justice -- Intertwining Identities and Movements. Part II. The Feminist Judgments. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) -- Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942) -- Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) -- Maher v. Roe, 432 US 464 (1977) -- In Re Madyun, 114 Daily Wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super Ct. 1986) -- Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993) -- Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2000) -- State v. Oakley, 245 Wis. 2d 447 (2001) -- Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dept. of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 -- K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005) -- Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012) -- Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. ---, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013) -- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. (2014) -- Young v. UPS, 575 U.S. (2015) -- Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 1-108-42543-7
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Meinten Sie 9781108348607?
Meinten Sie 9781108348485?
Meinten Sie 9781108348102?
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz