UID:
almafu_9960119057002883
Format:
1 online resource (358 pages) :
,
digital, PDF file(s).
Edition:
First edition.
ISBN:
9781108687287
,
1108687288
,
9781108619400
,
1108619401
,
9781108610223
,
1108610226
Series Statement:
World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Reports
Content:
The Dispute Settlement Reports are the WTO authorized and paginated reports in English. They are an essential addition to the library of all practicing and academic trade lawyers and needed by students worldwide taking courses in international economic or trade law. DSR 2017: Volume 1 reports on Canada - Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports of Certain Carbon Steel Welded Pipe from the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (WT/DS482) and Russian Federation - Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union (WT/DS475).
Note:
Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 26 Oct 2018).
,
Cover -- Title page -- Half-title -- Copyright Information -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- Canada - Anti-Dumping Measures on Imports of Certain Carbon Steel Welded Pipe from the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu (WT/DS482) -- Report of the Panel -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- LIST OF ANNEXES -- CASES CITED IN THIS REPORT -- ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT -- 1. INTRODUCTION -- 1.1 Complaint by the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu -- 1.2 Panel Establishment and Composition -- 1.3 Panel Proceedings -- 1.3.1 General -- 1.3.2 Working procedures on Business ConfidentialInformation (BCI) -- 2. FACTUAL ASPECTS -- 2.1 The Measures at Issue -- 3. PARTIES' REQUESTS FOR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- 4. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES -- 5. ARGUMENTS OF THE THIRD PARTIES -- 6. INTERIM REVIEW -- 6.1 Paragraphs 6.9, 6.49, 6.50, 6.51, 6.72, 6.91, 6.102, 6.113, 6.123, 6.149, 6.166, and 6.213 (paragraphs 7.9, 7.49, 7.50, 7.51, 7.73, 7.92, 7.103, 7.114, 7.124, 7.150, 7.167, and 7.214 of the Final Report) -- 6.2 Paragraph 6.14 (paragraph 7.14 of the Final Report) -- 6.3 Paragraph 6.53 (paragraph 7.54 of the Final Report) -- 6.4 Paragraph 6.64 (paragraph 7.65 of the Final Report) -- 6.5 Paragraph 6.79 (paragraph 7.80 of the Final Report) -- 6.6 Paragraph 6.84 (paragraph 7.85 of the Final Report) -- 6.7 Paragraphs 6.109 and 6.111 (paragraphs 7.110 and 7.112 of the Final Report) -- 6.8 Paragraphs 6.133 and 6.135 (paragraphs 7.134 and 7.136 of the Final Report) -- 6.9 Paragraph 6.142 (paragraph 7.143 of the Final Report) -- 6.10 Paragraphs 6.144 and 6.145 (paragraphs 7.145 and 7.146 of the Final Report) -- 6.11 Paragraphs 6.170-6.173 (paragraphs 7.171-7.174 of the Final Report) -- 7. FINDINGS -- 7.1 General Principles Regarding Treaty Interpretation, the Applicable Standard of Review, and Burden of Proof.
,
7.1.1 Treaty Interpretation -- 7.1.2 Standard of Review -- 7.1.3 Burden of Proof -- 7.2 Immediate Termination under Article 5.8 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement: Exporter-Specific or Country-Wide Margins of Dumping? -- 7.2.1 Introduction -- 7.2.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.2.3 Main arguments of third parties -- 7.2.3.1 Brazil -- 7.2.3.2 European Union -- 7.2.3.3 Norway -- 7.2.3.4 United Arab Emirates -- 7.2.3.5 United States -- 7.2.4 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.2.4.1 Article 3.3 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.2.4.2 Article 9.4 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.2.4.3 De minimis exporters in Article 9.5 new shipper reviews -- 7.2.4.4 Conclusion -- 7.3 Multiple Margins of Dumping: Article 6.10 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.3.1 Introduction -- 7.3.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.3.3 Main arguments of third parties -- 7.3.3.1 Brazil -- 7.3.4 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.4 Provisional Measures on Imports from a Chinese Taipei Exporter with a Preliminary de minimis Margin of Dumping: Article 7.1(ii) of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.4.1 Introduction -- 7.4.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.4.3 Main arguments of third parties -- 7.4.3.1 Brazil -- 7.4.4 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.5 Additional claims under Articles 1, 7.5, and 9.2 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement, and Article VI:2 of the GATT 1994 -- 7.5.1 Introduction -- 7.5.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.5.3 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.6 The Treatment of Imports from Exporters with de minimisMargins of Dumping in the Injury Investigation: Article 3of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.6.1 Introduction -- 7.6.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.6.3 Main arguments of third parties -- 7.6.3.1 Brazil -- 7.6.3.2 United Arab Emirates -- 7.6.4 Evaluation by the Panel.
,
7.7 The Treatment of Factors Other than Dumped Imports in the Causation Analysis: Articles 3.1 and 3.5 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.7.1 Introduction -- 7.7.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.7.2.1 The effect of subsidization -- 7.7.2.2 Overcapacity -- 7.7.3 Main arguments of third parties -- 7.7.3.1 Brazil -- 7.7.3.2 European Union -- 7.7.3.3 United States -- 7.7.4 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.7.4.1 The effect of subsidization -- 7.7.4.2 Overcapacity -- 7.8 The Use of Facts Available in the Determination of the Dumping Margin and Duty Rate for "all other exporters": Article 6.8 and Annex II, paragraph 7, of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.8.1 Introduction -- 7.8.1.1 The relevant provisions -- 7.8.1.2 Factual background -- 7.8.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.8.3 Main arguments of third parties -- 7.8.3.1 European Union -- 7.8.3.2 United States -- 7.8.4 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.9 The Treatment of Imports of New Product Models or Types -- 7.9.1 Introduction -- 7.9.2 The relevance of the margin of dumping established during the investigation: Article 9.3 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.9.2.1 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.9.2.2 Main arguments of third parties -- 7.9.2.2.1 European Union -- 7.9.2.3 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.9.3 The CBSA's use of facts available: Article 6.8 andAnnex II of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.9.3.1 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.9.3.2 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.9.4 The determination of normal values for new product models or types: Article 2.2 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.9.4.1 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.9.4.2 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.9.5 The determination of an additional margin of dumping: Article 6.10 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement -- 7.9.5.1 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.9.5.2 Evaluation by the Panel.
,
7.10 Additional Claim under Article 1 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement and Article VI of the GATT 1994 -- 7.10.1 Introduction -- 7.10.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.10.3 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.11 "As such" Claims Concerning Subsection 2(1), Section 30.1, and Subsections 35(1), 35(2), 38(1), and 41(1) of SIMA -- 7.11.1 Introduction -- 7.11.2 Main arguments of the parties -- 7.11.3 Main arguments of third parties -- 7.11.3.1 United States -- 7.11.4 Evaluation by the Panel -- 7.12 "As such" Claims Concerning Subsections 42(1), 42(6), and 43(1) of SIMA and Subsection 37.1(1) of SIMR -- 7.13 Additional "as such" claims concerning subsection 2(1), section 30.1 and subsections 35(1), 35(2), 38(1), 41(1), 42(1), 42(6), and 43(1) of SIMA and subsection 37.1(1) of SIMR -- 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION -- ANNEX A -- ANNEX A-1 WORKING PROCEDURES OF THE PANEL (AS AMENDED) -- ANNEX A-2 ADDITIONAL WORKING PROCEDURES ON BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -- ANNEX B -- ANNEX B-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE FIRST WRITTEN SUBMISSION OF THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU -- ANNEX B-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE SECOND WRITTEN SUBMISSION OF THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU -- ANNEX B-3 INTEGRATED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE STATEMENTS OF THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU AT THE FIRST MEETING OF THE PANEL -- ANNEX B-4 INTEGRATED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE STATEMENTS OF THE SEPARATE CUSTOMS TERRITORY OF TAIWAN, PENGHU, KINMEN AND MATSU AT THE SECOND MEETING OF THE PANEL -- ANNEX C -- ANNEX C-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE FIRST WRITTEN SUBMISSION OF CANADA -- ANNEX C-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE SECOND WRITTEN SUBMISSION OF CANADA -- ANNEX C-3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE STATEMENT OF CANADA AT THE FIRST MEETING OF THE PANEL.
,
ANNEX C-4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE STATEMENT OF CANADA AT THE SECOND MEETING OF THE PANEL -- ANNEX D -- ANNEX D-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENTS OF BRAZIL -- ANNEX D-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION -- ANNEX D-3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENTS OF NORWAY -- ANNEX D-4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES -- ANNEX D-5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES -- Russian Federation - Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union (WT/DS475) -- Report of the Appellate Body -- TABLE OF CONTENTS -- LIST OF ANNEXES -- ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT -- PANEL EXHIBITS CITED IN THIS REPORT -- CASES CITED IN THIS REPORT -- 1. INTRODUCTION -- 2. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTICIPANTS -- 3. ARGUMENTS OF THE THIRD PARTICIPANTS -- 4. ISSUES RAISED IN THIS APPEAL -- 5. ANALYSIS OF THE APPELLATE BODY -- 5.1 The Measures at Issue -- 5.1.1 The EU-wide ban -- 5.1.2 The country-specific import bans -- 5.2 Russia's Claims Relating to the Attribution of the EU-Wide Ban -- 5.2.1 The Panel's findings -- 5.2.2 Whether the Panel erred in attributing the EU-wide ban to Russia -- 5.2.2.1 Conclusion on Russia's claim regarding the attribution of the EU-wide ban to Russia -- 5.2.3 Whether the Panel erred in finding that Russia's terms of accession to the WTO did not limit the Panel's assessment of the European Union's claims regarding the EU-wide ban -- 5.2.3.1 Conclusion on Russia's claim regarding Russia's terms of accession to the WTO -- 5.3 Claims under Article 6 of the SPS Agreement -- 5.3.1 Russia's claims under Article 6.3 of the SPS Agreement -- 5.3.1.1 The Panel's findings -- 5.3.1.2 Interpretation of Article 6.3 of the SPS Agreement.
,
5.3.1.3 Whether the Panel erred in not finding that Article 6.3 requires consideration of the evidence relied upon by the importing Member.
Additional Edition:
ISBN 9781108482943
Additional Edition:
ISBN 1108482945
Language:
English
Bookmarklink
