Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Medientyp
Sprache
Region
Bibliothek
Erscheinungszeitraum
Person/Organisation
Zugriff
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press,
    UID:
    almafu_9958059375202883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (205 p.)
    Ausgabe: Core Textbook
    ISBN: 9786612753589 , 9781400822775 , 1400822777 , 9781282753587 , 1282753584 , 9781400811168 , 1400811163
    Inhalt: Is it ever legitimate to redraw electoral districts on the basis of race? In its long struggle with this question, the U.S. Supreme Court has treated race-conscious redistricting either as a requirement of political fairness or as an exercise in corrosive racial "as. Cutting through these contradictory positions, Keith Bybee examines the theoretical foundations of the Court's decisions and the ideological controversy those decisions have engendered. He uncovers erroneous assumptions about political identity on both sides of the debate and formulates new terms on which minority representation can be pursued. As Bybee shows, the Court has for the last twenty years encouraged a division between individualist and group concepts of political identity. He demonstrates convincingly that both individualist and group proponents share the misguided notion that political identity is formed prior to and apart from politics itself. According to Bybee, this "mistaken identity" should be abandoned for a more flexible, politically informed understanding of who the "people" really are. Thus, a misdirected debate will be replaced by a more considered discussion in which the people can speak for themselves, even as the Court speaks on their behalf. Engaged in the politics of minority representation, the Court will be able to help citizens articulate and achieve more fruitful forms of political community.
    Anmerkung: Description based upon print version of record. , Front matter -- , Contents -- , Acknowledgments -- , Introduction -- , Chapter One. The Voting Rights Act and the Struggle for Meaningful Political Membership -- , Chapter Two. The Supreme Court and Representation: Building an Analytical Framework -- , Chapter Three. Sound and Fury: Identifying the Role of Political Identity in the Public Debate -- , Chapter Four. The Early Cases -- , Chapter Five. The Later Cases: The Polarization of Judicial Debate -- , Chapter Six. The Possibilities of Legislative Learning -- , Appendix Table of Cases -- , Reference List -- , Index , Issued also in print. , English
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 9780691094960
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0691094969
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 9780691017297
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0691017298
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press,
    UID:
    edoccha_9958059375202883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (205 p.)
    Ausgabe: Core Textbook
    ISBN: 1-4008-2277-7 , 9786612753589 , 1-282-75358-4 , 1-4008-1116-3
    Inhalt: Is it ever legitimate to redraw electoral districts on the basis of race? In its long struggle with this question, the U.S. Supreme Court has treated race-conscious redistricting either as a requirement of political fairness or as an exercise in corrosive racial "as. Cutting through these contradictory positions, Keith Bybee examines the theoretical foundations of the Court's decisions and the ideological controversy those decisions have engendered. He uncovers erroneous assumptions about political identity on both sides of the debate and formulates new terms on which minority representation can be pursued. As Bybee shows, the Court has for the last twenty years encouraged a division between individualist and group concepts of political identity. He demonstrates convincingly that both individualist and group proponents share the misguided notion that political identity is formed prior to and apart from politics itself. According to Bybee, this "mistaken identity" should be abandoned for a more flexible, politically informed understanding of who the "people" really are. Thus, a misdirected debate will be replaced by a more considered discussion in which the people can speak for themselves, even as the Court speaks on their behalf. Engaged in the politics of minority representation, the Court will be able to help citizens articulate and achieve more fruitful forms of political community.
    Anmerkung: Description based upon print version of record. , Front matter -- , Contents -- , Acknowledgments -- , Introduction -- , Chapter One. The Voting Rights Act and the Struggle for Meaningful Political Membership -- , Chapter Two. The Supreme Court and Representation: Building an Analytical Framework -- , Chapter Three. Sound and Fury: Identifying the Role of Political Identity in the Public Debate -- , Chapter Four. The Early Cases -- , Chapter Five. The Later Cases: The Polarization of Judicial Debate -- , Chapter Six. The Possibilities of Legislative Learning -- , Appendix Table of Cases -- , Reference List -- , Index , Issued also in print. , English
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-691-09496-9
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-691-01729-8
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Princeton, N.J : Princeton University Press
    UID:
    gbv_100359140X
    Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (x, 194 pages)
    Ausgabe: Online-Ausg.
    ISBN: 0691017298 , 0691094969 , 1400811163 , 1400822777 , 9780691094960 , 9781400811168 , 9781400822775
    Inhalt: Is it ever legitimate to redraw electoral districts on the basis of race? In its long struggle with this question, the U.S. Supreme Court has treated race-conscious redistricting either as a requirement of political fairness or as an exercise in corrosive racial quotas. Cutting through these contradictory positions, Keith Bybee examines the theoretical foundations of the Court's decisions and the ideological controversy those decisions have engendered. He uncovers erroneous assumptions about political identity on both sides of the debate and formulates new terms on which minority representati
    Anmerkung: Includes bibliographical references (pages 175-189) and index , Chapter 1 The Voting Rights Act and the Struggle for Meaningful Political Membership 12 -- Chapter 2 The Supreme Court and Representation: Building an Analytical Framework 30 -- Chapter 3 Sound and Fury: Identifying the Role of Political Identity in the Public Debate 51 -- Chapter 4 The Early Cases 70 -- Chapter 5 The Later Cases: The Polarization of Judicial Debate 98 -- Chapter 6 The Possibilities of Legislative Learning 145. , English
    Weitere Ausg.: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Bybee, Keith J., 1965- Mistaken identity Princeton, N.J : Princeton University Press, ©1998
    Sprache: Englisch
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Meinten Sie 9781400811366?
Meinten Sie 9781400811069?
Meinten Sie 9781400811151?
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz