Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
Medientyp
Sprache
Region
Bibliothek
Erscheinungszeitraum
Person/Organisation
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Princeton, N.J. :Princeton University Press,
    UID:
    almafu_9958352503002883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (216 pages) : , illustrations.
    Ausgabe: Course Book.
    Ausgabe: Electronic reproduction. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 2008. Mode of access: World Wide Web.
    Ausgabe: System requirements: Web browser.
    Ausgabe: Access may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
    ISBN: 9781400829637
    Serie: The University Center for Human Values Series
    Inhalt: Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an attack is in progress? Is the Bush Doctrine of aggressive preventive action a justified and legal recourse against threats posed by terrorists and rogue states? Tackling one of the most controversial policy issues of the post-September 11 world, Michael Doyle argues that neither the Bush Doctrine nor customary international law is capable of adequately responding to the pressing security threats of our times. In Striking First, Doyle shows how the Bush Doctrine has consistently disregarded a vital distinction in international law between acts of preemption in the face of imminent threats and those of prevention in the face of the growing offensive capability of an enemy. Taking a close look at the Iraq war, the 1998 attack against al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, among other conflicts, he contends that international law must rely more completely on United Nations Charter procedures and develop clearer standards for dealing with lethal but not immediate threats. After explaining how the UN can again play an important role in enforcing international law and strengthening international guidelines for responding to threats, he describes the rare circumstances when unilateral action is indeed necessary. Based on the 2006 Tanner Lectures at Princeton University, Striking First includes responses by distinguished political theorists Richard Tuck and Jeffrey McMahan and international law scholar Harold Koh, yielding a lively debate that will redefine how--and for what reasons--tomorrow's wars are fought.
    Anmerkung: Frontmatter -- , CONTENTS -- , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS / , INTRODUCTION / , Einleitung / , INTERNATIONAL LAW AND CURRENT STANDARDS / , STANDARDS / , COMMENT / , COMMENT / , COMMENT / , RESPONSE TO COMMENTATORS / , CONTRIBUTORS -- , INDEX. , In English.
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Princeton, NJ :Princeton University Press,
    UID:
    almafu_9959228929602883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (200 p.)
    Ausgabe: Course Book
    ISBN: 1-4008-2963-1 , 9786612158377 , 1-282-15837-6
    Serie: The University Center for Human Values series
    Inhalt: Does the United States have the right to defend itself by striking first, or must it wait until an attack is in progress? Is the Bush Doctrine of aggressive preventive action a justified and legal recourse against threats posed by terrorists and rogue states? Tackling one of the most controversial policy issues of the post-September 11 world, Michael Doyle argues that neither the Bush Doctrine nor customary international law is capable of adequately responding to the pressing security threats of our times. In Striking First, Doyle shows how the Bush Doctrine has consistently disregarded a vital distinction in international law between acts of preemption in the face of imminent threats and those of prevention in the face of the growing offensive capability of an enemy. Taking a close look at the Iraq war, the 1998 attack against al Qaeda in Afghanistan, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, among other conflicts, he contends that international law must rely more completely on United Nations Charter procedures and develop clearer standards for dealing with lethal but not immediate threats. After explaining how the UN can again play an important role in enforcing international law and strengthening international guidelines for responding to threats, he describes the rare circumstances when unilateral action is indeed necessary. Based on the 2006 Tanner Lectures at Princeton University, Striking First includes responses by distinguished political theorists Richard Tuck and Jeffrey McMahan and international law scholar Harold Koh, yielding a lively debate that will redefine how--and for what reasons--tomorrow's wars are fought.
    Anmerkung: Description based upon print version of record. , Frontmatter -- , CONTENTS -- , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS / , INTRODUCTION / , STRIKING FIRST -- , Einleitung / , INTERNATIONAL LAW AND CURRENT STANDARDS / , STANDARDS / , COMMENT / , COMMENT / , COMMENT / , RESPONSE TO COMMENTATORS / , CONTRIBUTORS -- , INDEX , Issued also in print. , English
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-691-13658-0
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 0-691-14996-8
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Meinten Sie 9781400821617?
Meinten Sie 9781000829631?
Meinten Sie 9781400820634?
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz