Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cham :Springer International Publishing AG,
    UID:
    almahu_9949602155302882
    Umfang: 1 online resource (387 pages)
    Ausgabe: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 9783030125202
    Serie: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice Series ; v.74
    Anmerkung: Intro -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Editors and Contributors -- Abbreviations -- Keywords -- 1 Introduction -- Abstract -- 1 Criminal Justice as a Barometer of Social Developments -- 2 Criminal Trials and Human Rights -- 3 Exclusionary Rules as Safeguards -- 4 Comparative Perspectives on Exclusionary Rules -- 5 Core Issues Surrounding the Effectiveness of Exclusionary Rules -- References -- Books -- Journal Articles -- Contributions to Edited Volumes and Annotated Law -- Comparative Perspectives -- 2 The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Establishing Facts in Swiss Criminal Proceedings -- 2.1 Legal Framework and Relevant Actors -- 2.1.1 General Rules -- 2.1.1.1 Duties in Criminal Investigations -- 2.1.1.2 Securing a Fair Trial -- 2.1.1.3 Balancing Fact-Finding and Individual Rights -- 2.1.2 Establishing the Facts, Procedural Rules, and Stages -- 2.1.3 Establishing the Facts: Actors and Accountability -- 2.1.3.1 Primary Actors -- 2.1.3.2 Supervision of Judicial Authorities and Legal Remedies -- 2.1.3.3 Liability of the State and Legal Officials for Improper Compulsion in Criminal Investigations -- 2.1.4 Establishing the Facts: Institutional Safeguards -- 2.2 Relevance of the Truth and Individual Rights in Criminal Trials -- 2.2.1 Public Interest in Determining the Truth -- 2.2.2 Presenting the "Truth" to the Public -- 2.2.3 Miscarriages of Justice -- 3 Limitations of Fact-Finding with Exclusionary Rules in Switzerland -- 3.1 Exclusionary Rules in Swiss Criminal Proceedings -- 3.1.1 Rationale -- 3.1.2 The CPC's System of Exclusionary Rules -- 3.1.3 Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court -- 3.1.4 Enforcement of Exclusionary Rules -- 3.2 Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence Following Improper Compulsory Techniques. , 3.2.1 The Right Against Self-Incrimination and Improper Compulsory Measures -- 3.2.2 Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment -- 3.2.3 Institutional Bans on Torture and the Right to Remain Silent -- 3.2.4 Exclusionary Rules Applicable to Illegally Obtained Evidence -- 3.2.4.1 Legal Framework -- 3.2.4.2 Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court -- 3.2.5 Admissibility of Fruit of Poisonous Tree in Cases of Torture and Improper Compulsory Techniques -- 3.2.5.1 Legal Framework -- 3.2.5.2 Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court -- 3.2.6 The Effect of International Human Rights Law -- 4 Statistics -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Books -- Journal Articles -- Contributions to Edited Volumes and Annotated Law -- Reports, Legislative History -- 3 The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 General Framework for Establishing Facts in Criminal Proceedings -- 2.1 Legal Framework and Relevant Actors -- 2.1.1 General Rules -- 2.1.1.1 Law Determining Duties in Criminal Investigations -- 2.1.1.2 Law Securing a Fair Trial -- 2.1.1.3 Other Individual Rights with Relevance for the Criminal Process -- 2.1.1.4 Law Balancing the Search for Evidence and Infringements of Individual Rights -- 2.1.2 Establishing Facts-Stages and Rules -- 2.1.3 Establishing Facts-Actors and Accountability -- 2.1.4 Establishing Facts-Institutional Safeguards -- 2.2 Social Relevance of Truth and Individual Rights in Criminal Trials -- 2.2.1 Relevance of Determining the Truth -- 2.2.2 Presentation of "Facts" Respectively "Fact-Finding" And/Or "Truth" to the Public -- 2.2.3 Public Discussion of Miscarriages of Justice -- 3 Limitations of Fact-Finding in Criminal Proceedings -- 3.1 General Rules on Taking Evidence (Admissibility of Evidence) -- 3.1.1 Legal Framework. , 3.1.1.1 Legal Framework for Taking Evidence and Admissibility of Evidence -- 3.1.1.2 Practice and Jurisprudence -- 3.1.1.3 Consequences of a Violation of Exclusionary Rules -- 3.1.2 Debate on Exclusionary Rules -- 3.1.3 Institutional Arrangements Securing Individual Rights -- 3.2 Evidence Obtained by Torture -- 3.2.1 Definitions of Torture and Inhuman Treatment -- 3.2.2 Definition of Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- 3.2.3 Exclusionary Rules for Evidence Obtained by Torture -- 3.2.3.1 Procedure -- 3.2.3.2 Exclusionary Rules in Public Debate -- 3.2.4 Institutional Arrangements Securing the Ban on Torture -- 3.2.5 Exclusion of Evidence and Other Remedies Following a Breach of the Ban on Torture -- 3.2.6 Admissibility of Indirect Evidence ("Fruits of the Poisonous Tree") in Cases of Torture -- 3.3 Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence-Cases of Undue Coercion -- 3.3.1 Institutional Arrangements Securing the Right to Remain Silent -- 3.3.2 Exclusionary Rules for Evidence Obtained in Violation of the Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- 3.3.3 Remedies Following Violations of Exclusionary Rules -- 4 Statistics -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Books -- Journal Articles -- Contributions to Edited Volumes and Annotated Law -- 4 Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Fact-Finding Procedure: Stages, Rules, and Actors -- 2.1 Stages and Rules -- 2.2 Actors and Accountability -- 3 General Framework for Fact-Finding in Criminal Proceedings -- 3.1 Law Relating to the Search for Truth -- 3.2 Law Protecting Individual Rights -- 3.3 Law Balancing the Search for Truth and Individual Rights Protections -- 3.4 Social Relevance of Truth and Individual Rights in Criminal Trials -- 3.4.1 Relevance of Determining the Truth. , 3.4.2 Presentation of Factfinding to the Public -- 3.4.3 Public Discussion of Miscarriages of Justice -- 4 Constitutional Limitations on the Admissibility of Confessions in Criminal Proceedings -- 4.1 Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Limits on Admissibility of Confessions -- 4.2 Sixth Amendment Limits on Admissibility of Confessions -- 4.3 The Miranda Safeguards Against Coerced Confessions -- 4.4 Exclusion of Evidence Obtained by Torture or Undue Coercion -- 4.5 Debate on Exclusionary Rules -- 5 Conclusion -- References -- Books -- Journal Articles -- Contributions to Edited Volumes and Annotated Law -- Reports, Legislative History -- 5 The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 General Framework for Establishing Facts in Criminal Proceedings -- 2.1 Legal Framework and Relevant Actors -- 2.1.1 General Rules -- 2.1.1.1 Law Determining Duties in Criminal Investigations -- 2.1.1.2 Laws Securing a Fair Trial -- 2.1.1.3 Laws Balancing the Search for the Truth and Infringements of Individual Rights -- 2.1.2 Establishing Facts-Stages and Rules -- 2.1.3 Establishing Facts-Actors and Accountability -- 2.2 Social Relevance of Truth and Individual Rights in Criminal Trials -- 2.2.1 Relevance of Determining the Truth -- 2.2.2 Presentation of "Facts", "Fact-Finding" and/or "Truth" to the Public -- 2.2.3 Public Discussion of Miscarriages of Justice -- 3 Limitations of Fact-Finding in Criminal Proceedings -- 3.1 General Rules of Evidence Taking (Admissibility of Evidence) -- 3.1.1 Specific Exclusionary Rules of the CCP -- 3.1.1.1 Confessions Collected During Specific Periods of Time Mandated by Law or at Night (Art. 158-2 Para. 1 of the CCP) -- 3.1.1.2 Right to Remain Silent and Access to a Defense Attorney (Art. 158-2 Para. 2 of the CCP). , 3.1.2 Specific Exclusionary Rules of the Communication Security and Surveillance Act -- 3.1.3 General Exclusionary Rules of the CCP -- 3.2 Exclusion of Evidence Obtained by Torture and Undue Coercion -- 3.2.1 Definitions of Torture, Undue Coercion and Degrading Punishment -- 3.2.2 Definitions of Right to Remain Silent/Privilege Against Self-incrimination -- 3.2.3 Exclusionary Rules for Evidence (Possibly) Obtained by Torture and Undue Coercion -- 3.2.3.1 Legal Framework -- 3.2.3.2 Practice -- (High Court) Jurisprudence -- Protecting Human Dignity of the Defendant and His Status as a Party -- Safeguarding the Liberty of Decision Making and Mental Activities of the Defendant -- Deterrence from Illegal Investigatory Activity Based on the Principle of the Due Process of Law -- 3.2.4 Institutional Arrangements Securing the Ban on Torture Undue Coercion -- 3.2.5 Exclusion of Evidence or Other Remedies Following a Breach of the Ban on Torture and Undue Coercion -- 3.2.6 Admissibility of Indirect Evidence ("Fruits of Poisonous Tree") in Cases of Torture and Undue Coercion -- 3.2.6.1 Legal Framework -- 3.2.6.2 Practice -- (High Court) Jurisprudence -- 3.2.7 Effect of International Human Rights -- 4 Statistics -- 5 Conclusion -- Sec38 -- References -- 6 The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 General Framework for Fact-Finding in Criminal Proceedings -- 2.1 Legal Framework and Relevant Actors -- 2.1.1 General Rules -- 2.1.1.1 Law Determining a Duty to Search for the Truth -- 2.1.1.2 Law Securing a Fair Trial and/or Individual Rights -- Constitutional Rules -- Statutory Rules -- International Human Rights Law -- 2.1.1.3 Law Balancing a Duty to Determine the Truth and Infringements on Individual Rights -- 2.1.2 Fact-Finding Procedure-Stages and Rules. , 2.1.3 Fact-Finding Procedure-Actors and Accountability.
    Weitere Ausg.: Print version: Gless, Sabine Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2019 ISBN 9783030125196
    Sprache: Englisch
    Fachgebiete: Rechtswissenschaft
    RVK:
    Schlagwort(e): Electronic books. ; Aufsatzsammlung
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    URL: Volltext  (kostenfrei)
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 2
    UID:
    almahu_9948148277102882
    Umfang: XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color. , online resource.
    Ausgabe: 1st ed. 2019.
    ISBN: 9783030125202
    Serie: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 74
    Inhalt: This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.
    Anmerkung: Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change?
    In: Springer eBooks
    Weitere Ausg.: Printed edition: ISBN 9783030125196
    Weitere Ausg.: Printed edition: ISBN 9783030125219
    Weitere Ausg.: Printed edition: ISBN 9783030125226
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 3
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cham : Springer Nature | Cham :Springer International Publishing :
    UID:
    almahu_9949595430502882
    Umfang: 1 online resource (XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color.)
    Ausgabe: 1st ed. 2019.
    ISBN: 3-030-12520-3
    Serie: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 74
    Inhalt: This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.
    Anmerkung: Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change? , English
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 3-030-12519-X
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 4
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cham : Springer Nature | Cham :Springer International Publishing :
    UID:
    edoccha_9959074451902883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color.)
    Ausgabe: 1st ed. 2019.
    ISBN: 3-030-12520-3
    Serie: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 74
    Inhalt: This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.
    Anmerkung: Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change? , English
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 3-030-12519-X
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 5
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cham : Springer Nature | Cham :Springer International Publishing :
    UID:
    edocfu_9959074451902883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color.)
    Ausgabe: 1st ed. 2019.
    ISBN: 3-030-12520-3
    Serie: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 74
    Inhalt: This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.
    Anmerkung: Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change? , English
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 3-030-12519-X
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
  • 6
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Cham : Springer Nature | Cham :Springer International Publishing :
    UID:
    almafu_9959074451902883
    Umfang: 1 online resource (XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color.)
    Ausgabe: 1st ed. 2019.
    ISBN: 3-030-12520-3
    Serie: Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 74
    Inhalt: This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.
    Anmerkung: Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change? , English
    Weitere Ausg.: ISBN 3-030-12519-X
    Sprache: Englisch
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Meinten Sie 9783030121396?
Meinten Sie 9783030012519?
Meinten Sie 9783030105198?
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz