Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin [u.a.] :de Gruyter,
    UID:
    almafu_BV042346770
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 204 S.).
    ISBN: 978-3-11-019734-1
    Series Statement: Interface explorations 8
    Content: "This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. ("Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem.") 1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. ("Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in.") 1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. ("The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here.") 1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. ("Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin.") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. ("Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon.") 1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. ("Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow.") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality, however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh] Complementizer."
    Note: Teilw. zugl.: Pennsylvania, Univ., Diss., 1999
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe ISBN 978-3-11-017952-1
    Language: English
    Subjects: Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures , English Studies
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Infinite Verbform ; Modalität ; Hochschulschrift
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Author information: Bhatt, Rajesh 1973-
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin [u.a.] :de Gruyter,
    UID:
    edocfu_BV042346770
    Format: 1 Online-Ressource (VIII, 204 S.).
    ISBN: 978-3-11-019734-1
    Series Statement: Interface explorations 8
    Content: "This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. ("Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem.") 1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. ("Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in.") 1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. ("The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here.") 1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. ("Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin.") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. ("Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon.") 1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. ("Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow.") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality, however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh] Complementizer."
    Note: Teilw. zugl.: Pennsylvania, Univ., Diss., 1999
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe ISBN 978-3-11-017952-1
    Language: English
    Subjects: Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures , English Studies
    RVK:
    RVK:
    Keywords: Infinite Verbform ; Modalität ; Hochschulschrift
    URL: Volltext  (URL des Erstveröffentlichers)
    Author information: Bhatt, Rajesh 1973-
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin ;Boston :De Gruyter Mouton,
    UID:
    edocfu_9958353603402883
    Format: 1 online resource (212p.)
    ISBN: 9783110197341
    Series Statement: Interface Explorations [IE] ; 8
    Content: This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. ("Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem.")1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. ("Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in.")1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. ("The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here.")1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. ("Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin.") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. ("Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon.")1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. ("Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow.") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality; however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh]
    Note: Frontmatter -- , Contents -- , Chapter 1. Introduction -- , Chapter 2. The syntax of infinitival -- , relatives -- , Chapter 3. Non-Modal subject infinitival -- , relatives -- , Chapter 4. Infinitival questions -- , Chapter 5. Ability modals and their actuality -- , entailments -- , Backmatter , In English.
    Additional Edition: ISBN 978-3-11-017952-1
    Language: English
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin ; : Mouton de Gruyter,
    UID:
    edocfu_9959241872502883
    Format: 1 online resource (216 p.)
    Edition: 1st ed.
    ISBN: 1-282-19387-2 , 9786612193873 , 3-11-019734-0
    Series Statement: Interface explorations ; 8
    Content: This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. ("Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem.")1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. ("Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in.")1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. ("The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here.")1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. ("Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin.") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. ("Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon.")1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. ("Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow.") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality; however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh] Complementizer.
    Note: Description based upon print version of record. , Dissertation University of Pennsylvania 1999. , Front matter -- , Contents -- , Chapter 1. Introduction -- , Chapter 2. The syntax of infinitival relatives -- , Chapter 3. Non-Modal subject infinitival relatives -- , Chapter 4. Infinitival questions -- , Chapter 5. Ability modals and their actuality entailments -- , Back matter , Issued also in print. , English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 3-11-017952-0
    Language: English
    Subjects: Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures
    RVK:
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin, New York : Mouton de Gruyter
    UID:
    gbv_640977146
    Format: Online-Ressource
    ISBN: 3110179520
    Series Statement: Interface Explorations 8
    Content: "This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. (""Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem."") 1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. (""Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in."") 1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. (""The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here."") 1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. (""Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin."") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. (""Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon."") 1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. (""Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow."") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality, however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh] Complementizer.
    Content: "This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. (""Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem."") 1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. (""Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in."") 1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. (""The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here."") 1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. (""Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin."") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. (""Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon."") 1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. (""Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow."") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality, however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh] Complementizer."
    Note: In English
    Additional Edition: ISBN 3110179520
    Additional Edition: Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Bhatt, Rajesh, 1973 - Covert modality in non-finite contexts Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006 ISBN 3110179520
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783110179521
    Language: English
    Subjects: Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures
    RVK:
    Keywords: Infinite Verbform ; Modalität
    URL: Volltext  (lizenzpflichtig)
    URL: Cover
    URL: Cover
    URL: Cover
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Berlin ; : De Gruyter Mouton,
    UID:
    almahu_9949481561302882
    Format: 1 online resource (204 p.)
    ISBN: 9783110197341 , 9783110238570
    Series Statement: Interface Explorations [IE] , 8
    Content: This book investigates the distribution and interpretation of Covert Modality. Covert Modality is modality which we interpret but which is not associated with any lexical item in the structure that we are interpreting. This dissertation investigates a class of environments that involves covert modality. Examples of covert modality include wh-infinitival complements, infinitival relative clauses, purpose clauses, the 'have to' construction, and the 'is to' construction (cf. 1): 1a. Tim knows [how to solve the problem]. ("Tim knows how one/he could/should solve the problem.")1b. Jane found [a book to draw cartoons in] for Sara. ("Jane found a book for Sara one could/should draw cartoons in.")1c. [The man to fix the sink] is here. ("The man whose purpose is to fix the sink is here.")1d. Sue went to Torino [to buy a violin]. ("Sue went to Torino so that she could buy a violin.") 1e. Bill has to reach Philadelphia before noon. ("Bill must reach Philadelphia before noon.")1f. Will is to leave tomorrow. ("Will is scheduled/supposed to leave tomorrow.") The interpretation of (1a-f) involves modality; however, there is no lexical item that seems to be the source of the modality. What (1a-f) have in common is that they involve infinitivals. This book addresses the following questions about covert modality: what is the source of this modality, what are its semantic properties, why are some but not all infinitival relatives modal, and why are all infinitival questions modal? The infinitival [+wh] Complementizer is identified as the source of the covert modality. The apparent variability of the force of this modality is related to the particular semantics of this Complementizer. Infinitival relatives that receive a non-modal interpretation are analyzed as being reduced relatives and thus not involving the infinitival [+wh] Complementizer.
    Note: Dissertation University of Pennsylvania 1999. , Frontmatter -- , Contents -- , Chapter 1. Introduction -- , Chapter 2. The syntax of infinitival -- , relatives -- , Chapter 3. Non-Modal subject infinitival -- , relatives -- , Chapter 4. Infinitival questions -- , Chapter 5. Ability modals and their actuality -- , entailments -- , Backmatter , Issued also in print. , Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. , In English.
    In: DGBA Backlist Complete English Language 2000-2014 PART1, De Gruyter, 9783110238570
    In: DGBA Backlist Linguistics and Semiotics 2000-2014 (EN), De Gruyter, 9783110238457
    In: DGBA Linguistics and Semiotics 2000 - 2014, De Gruyter, 9783110636970
    In: De Gruyter Mouton Backlist 2000-2015, De Gruyter, 9783110742961
    In: E-BOOK GESAMTPAKET / COMPLETE PACKAGE 2008, De Gruyter, 9783110212129
    In: E-BOOK PACKAGE ENGLISH LANGUAGES TITLES 2008, De Gruyter, 9783110212136
    In: E-BOOK PAKET LINGUISTIK UND LITERATURWISSENSCHAFT 2008, De Gruyter, 9783110209457
    Additional Edition: ISBN 9783110179521
    Language: English
    Subjects: Comparative Studies. Non-European Languages/Literatures
    RVK:
    URL: Cover
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Did you mean 9783110117349?
Did you mean 9783110098341?
Did you mean 9783110127041?
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages