Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    In: Alzheimer's & Dementia, Wiley, Vol. 19, No. S3 ( 2023-06)
    Abstract: Mechanisms of resilience against tau pathology in individuals across the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) spectrum are insufficiently understood. Longitudinal data is necessary for revealing which factors contribute to maintaining cognition (cognitive resilience, CR) or preserving brain structure (brain resilience, BR) despite elevated tau, and for clarifying whether these factors provide a baseline advantage and/or moderate rates of brain structural and cognitive change. We therefore investigated whether age, sex, education, APOE‐e4 status, intracranial volume (ICV) and cortical thickness (in CR analysis) moderate the association between baseline tau load and subsequent changes in cognition and cortical thickness. Methods The study included 341 amyloid‐β‐positive individuals from a multi‐cohort dataset (BioFINDER‐1/AVID/ADNI/UCSF), diagnosed with MCI or AD dementia at the time of the baseline [ 18 F]flortaucipir tau‐PET scan, who had longitudinal cognitive assessments (CR sample). A subset (n = 133) additionally underwent longitudinal structural MRI (BR sample). We used (separate) linear mixed‐effect models with MMSE as outcome to investigate the association of key baseline variables‐of‐interest (age, sex, APOE‐e4 status, education, ICV and global cortical thickness) with cognitive decline in the presence of tau (covaried for cohort). A three‐way interaction between time, tau and the predictor‐of‐interest was initially assessed. In the absence of a moderation effect, we subsequently assessed models including only the two‐way interaction between each predictor and time. These analyses were repeated with global cortical thinning as an outcome variable. Results Characteristics of the CR sample and BR sub‐sample are described in Table‐1. Models revealed that younger age (β Interaction = ‐0.18, p 〈 0.01), higher education (β Interaction = ‐0.62, p 〈 0.001), larger ICV (β Interaction = ‐8.12, p 〈 0.01) and greater cortical thickness (β Interaction = ‐9.9, p 〈 0.05) were related to higher CR, as these factors moderated the relationship between tau pathology and decline in MMSE (Figure‐1,2). No predictor moderated tau effects on cortical thinning nor explained additional variance (Table‐2). Conclusion This study indicates that tau pathology affects cognitive decline differently across age, education, ICV and cortical thickness levels. Understanding moderators of prospective cognitive decline and cortical thinning related to tau pathology, as well as their complex interactions, may be relevant for improving prognosis and clinical trial design in AD.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1552-5260 , 1552-5279
    URL: Issue
    Language: English
    Publisher: Wiley
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2201940-6
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages