In:
Birth Defects Research, Wiley, Vol. 116, No. 1 ( 2024-01)
Abstract:
Given the lack of a national, population‐based birth defects surveillance program in the United States, the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) has facilitated important studies on surveillance, research, and prevention of major birth defects. We sought to summarize NBDPN peer‐reviewed publications and their impact. Methods We obtained and reviewed a curated list of 49 NBDPN multistate collaborative publications during 2000–2022, as of December 31, 2022. Each publication was reviewed and classified by type (e.g., risk factor association analysis). Key characteristics of study populations and analytic approaches used, along with publication impact (e.g., number of citations), were tabulated. Results NBDPN publications focused on prevalence estimates ( N = 17), surveillance methods ( N = 11), risk factor associations ( N = 10), mortality and other outcomes among affected individuals ( N = 6), and descriptive epidemiology of various birth defects ( N = 5). The most cited publications were those that reported on prevalence estimates for a spectrum of defects and those that assessed changes in neural tube defects (NTD) prevalence following mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States. Conclusions Results from multistate NBDPN publications have provided critical information not available through other sources, including US prevalence estimates of major birth defects, folic acid fortification and NTD prevention, and improved understanding of defect trends and surveillance efforts. Until a national birth defects surveillance program is established in the United States, NBDPN collaborative publications remain an important resource for investigating birth defects and informing decisions related to health services planning of secondary disabilities prevention and care.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2472-1727
,
2472-1727
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2024
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2884154-2
