In:
Brain and Behavior, Wiley, Vol. 13, No. 4 ( 2023-04)
Abstract:
Uncertainty remains about the association of potassium (K) intake with depression and anxiety status. We explored their relationship using 24‐h urinary K, reflecting K intake, in general population. Methods We collected 24‐h urine and performed self‐rating depression and anxiety scales (SDS, SAS) cross‐sectionally in adults selected by random sampling in China. SDS and SAS standard score ≥50 defined depression and anxiety status. Participants were divided into three groups (T1, T2, and T3) by 24‐h urinary K tertile. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding anti‐hypertensive agent takers. Results 546 participants comprised current analytical sample. First, T1 and T2 groups showed higher SDS scores (40.0 vs 40.0 vs 36.0, p = .001), prevalence (19.8 vs 15.9 vs 7.1%, p = .002), whereas increased adjusted odds for depression status only in T1 group (OR = 2.71, p = .017), compared with T3 group. Second, T1 and T2 groups showed higher SAS scores (38.0 vs 40 vs 35.0, p 〈 .001) and prevalence (14.8 vs 21.4 vs 8.8%, p = .003), whereas increased adjusted odds for anxiety status only in T2 group (OR = 2.07, p = .042), compared with T3 groups. Third, T1 and T2 groups showed higher prevalence (10.4% vs 11.5% vs 2.7%, p = .004) and adjusted odds (OR = 3.71, p = .013; OR = 3.66, p = .014) for co‐existent anxiety and depression status, compared with T3 group. Most results remained consistent in sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Lower K intake is implicated in presence of anxiety and depression status in general population; this may provide basis for programs to increase K intake and prevent disease.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2162-3279
,
2162-3279
Language:
English
Publisher:
Wiley
Publication Date:
2023
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2623587-0
