In:
Prenatal Diagnosis, Wiley, Vol. 39, No. 8 ( 2019-07), p. 635-642
Kurzfassung:
What's already known about this topic? Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has become widely implemented, either as a primary, secondary, or contingent test. In many countries, NIPT is now the preferred test among women with at high risk of fetal aneuploidy. Adding a new test opportunity makes the genetic counseling more complex. A high level of decisional conflict may cause later decisional regret. What does this study add? In our Danish population, only 23.8% of women at high risk chose NIPT as the secondary test for fetal aneuploidy. Choosing NIPT was associated with a higher level of decisional conflict. A high satisfaction with the genetic counselling was associated with low decisional conflict. Receiving genetic counselling the same day was associated with a high decisional conflict. We found a significant association between high decisional conflict and later decisional regret.
Materialart:
Online-Ressource
ISSN:
0197-3851
,
1097-0223
Sprache:
Englisch
Verlag:
Wiley
Publikationsdatum:
2019
ZDB Id:
1491217-X