Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Die Antwortzeit im Portal kann derzeit länger als üblich sein. Wir bitten um Entschuldigung.
Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2021
    In:  Clinical Research in Cardiology Vol. 110, No. 12 ( 2021-12), p. 1977-1982
    In: Clinical Research in Cardiology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 110, No. 12 ( 2021-12), p. 1977-1982
    Abstract: The effect of valve type on outcomes in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) has recently been subject of debate. We investigate outcomes of patients treated with balloon-expanding (BE) vs. self-expanding (SE) valves in in a cohort of all these procedures performed in Germany in 2018. Methods All patients receiving TF-TAVR with either BE ( N  = 9,882) or SE ( N  = 7,413) valves in Germany in 2018 were identified. In-hospital outcomes were analyzed for the endpoints in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, stroke, acute kidney injury, postoperative delirium, permanent pacemaker implantation, mechanical ventilation  〉  48 h, length of hospital stay, and reimbursement. Since patients were not randomized to the two treatment options, logistic or linear regression models were used with 22 baseline patient characteristics and center-specific variables as potential confounders. As a sensitivity analysis, the same confounding factors were taken into account using the propensity score methods (inverse probability of treatment weighting). Results Baseline characteristics differed substantially, with higher EuroSCORE ( p   〈  0.001), age ( p   〈  0.001) and rate of female sex ( p   〈  0.001) in SE treated patients. After risk adjustment, no marked differences in outcomes were found for in-hospital mortality [risk adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for SE instead of BE 0.94 (96% CI 0.76;1.17), p  = 0.617] major bleeding [aOR 0.91 (0.73;1.14), p  = 0.400], stroke [aOR 1.13 (0.88;1.46), p  = 0.347], acute kidney injury [OR 0.97 (0.85;1.10), p  = 0.621], postoperative delirium [aOR 1.09 (0.96;1.24), p  = 0.184], mechanical ventilation  〉  48 h [aOR 0.98 (0.77;1.25), p  = 0.893], length of hospital stay (risk adjusted difference in days of hospitalization (SE instead of BE): − 0.05 [− 0.34;0.25] , p  = 0.762) and reimbursement [risk adjusted difference in reimbursement (SE instead of BE): − €72 (− €291;€147), p  = 0.519)] There is, however, an increased risk of PPI for SE valves (aOR 1.27 [1.15;1.41] , p   〈  0.001). Similar results were found after application of propensity score adjustment. Conclusions We find broadly equivalent outcomes in contemporary TF-TAVR procedures, regardless of the valve type used. Incidence of major complications is very low for both types of valve.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 1861-0684 , 1861-0692
    RVK:
    Language: English
    Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publication Date: 2021
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2218331-0
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages