Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
  • 1
    Online-Ressource
    Online-Ressource
    Springer Science and Business Media LLC ; 2023
    In:  European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Vol. 280, No. 5 ( 2023-05), p. 2155-2163
    In: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 280, No. 5 ( 2023-05), p. 2155-2163
    Kurzfassung: Enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) is a common finding associated with inner ear malformations (IEM). However, uniform radiologic definitions for EVA are missing and various 2D-measurement methods to define EVA have been reported. This study evaluates VA volume in different types of IEM and compares 3D-reconstructed VA volume to 2D-measurements. Methods A total of 98 high-resolution CT (HRCT) data sets from temporal bones were analyzed (56 with IEM; [cochlear hypoplasia (CH; n  = 18), incomplete partition type I (IPI; n  = 12) and type II (IPII; n  = 11) and EVA ( n  = 15)]; 42 controls). VA diameter was measured in axial images. VA volume was analyzed by software-based, semi-automatic segmentation and 3D-reconstruction. Differences in VA volume between the groups and associations between VA volume and VA diameter were assessed. Inter-rater-reliability (IRR) was assessed using the intra-class-correlation-coefficient (ICC). Results Larger VA volumes were found in IEM compared to controls. Significant differences in VA volume between patients with EVA and controls ( p   〈  0.001) as well as between IPII and controls ( p   〈  0.001) were found. VA diameter at the midpoint (VA midpoint) and at the operculum (VA operculum) correlated to VA volume in IPI (VA midpoint: r  = 0.78, VA operculum: r  = 0.91), in CH (VA midpoint: r  = 0.59, VA operculum: r  = 0.61), in EVA (VA midpoint: r  = 0.55, VA operculum: r  = 0.66) and in controls (VA midpoint: r  = 0.36, VA operculum: r  = 0.42). The highest IRR was found for VA volume (ICC = 0.90). Conclusions The VA diameter may be an insufficient estimate of VA volume, since (1) measurement of VA diameter does not reliably correlate with VA volume and (2) VA diameter shows a lower IRR than VA volume. 3D-reconstruction and VA volumetry may add information in diagnosing EVA in cases with or without additional IEM.
    Materialart: Online-Ressource
    ISSN: 0937-4477 , 1434-4726
    RVK:
    Sprache: Englisch
    Verlag: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
    Publikationsdatum: 2023
    ZDB Id: 1459042-6
    Bibliothek Standort Signatur Band/Heft/Jahr Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie auf den KOBV Seiten zum Datenschutz