In:
Scientific Reports, Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Vol. 12, No. 1 ( 2022-10-21)
Abstract:
Accurate determination of resection margins in breast specimens is important as complete removal of malignancy is a prerequisite for patients’ outcome. Mammography (DM) as 2D-technique provides only limited value in margin assessment. Therefore, we investigated whether cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has incremental value in assessing margins to microcalcifications. Three independent readers investigated breast specimens for presence of microcalcifications and the smallest distance to margins. Histopathology served as gold standard. Microcalcifications were detected in 15 out of 21 included specimens (71%). Pooled sensitivity for DM, DBT and CBCT for microcalcifications compared to preoperative DM was 0.98 (CI 0.94–0.99), 0.83 (CI 0.73–0.94) and 0.94 (CI 0.87–0.99), pooled specificity was 0.99 (CI 0.99–0.99), 0.73 (CI 0.51–0.96) and 0.60 (CI 0.35–0.85). Mean measurement error for margin determination for DM, DBT and CBCT was 10 mm, 14 mm and 6 mm ( p = 0.002) with significant difference between CBCT and the other devices ( p 〈 0.03). Mean reading time required by the readers to analyze DM, DBT and CBCT, was 36, 43 and 54 s ( p 〈 0.001). Although DM allows reliable detection of microcalcifications, measurement of resection margin was significantly more accurate with CBCT. Thus, a combination of methods or improved CBCT might provide a more accurate determination of disease-free margins in breast specimens.
Type of Medium:
Online Resource
ISSN:
2045-2322
DOI:
10.1038/s41598-022-21616-3
Language:
English
Publisher:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Publication Date:
2022
detail.hit.zdb_id:
2615211-3
