Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Online Resource
    Online Resource
    Georg Thieme Verlag KG ; 2023
    In:  Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound Vol. 44, No. 01 ( 2023-02), p. 56-67
    In: Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound, Georg Thieme Verlag KG, Vol. 44, No. 01 ( 2023-02), p. 56-67
    Abstract: Purpose To assess the longitudinal variation of the ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility index (UCR) in late preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR). Materials and Methods A prospective European multicenter observational study included women with a singleton pregnancy, 32+ 0–36+ 6, at risk of FGR (estimated fetal weight [EFW] or abdominal circumference [AC] 〈  10th percentile, abnormal arterial Doppler or fall in AC from 20-week scan of 〉  40 percentile points). The primary outcome was a composite of abnormal condition at birth or major neonatal morbidity. UCR was categorized as normal ( 〈  0.9) or abnormal (≥ 0.9). UCR was assessed by gestational age at measurement interval to delivery, and by individual linear regression coefficient in women with two or more measurements. Results 856 women had 2770 measurements; 696 (81 %) had more than one measurement (median 3 (IQR 2–4). At inclusion, 63 (7 %) a UCR ≥ 0.9. These delivered earlier and had a lower birth weight and higher incidence of adverse outcome (30 % vs. 9 %, relative risk 3.2; 95 %CI 2.1–5.0) than women with a normal UCR at inclusion. Repeated measurements after an abnormal UCR at inclusion were abnormal again in 67 % (95 %CI 55–80), but after a normal UCR the chance of finding an abnormal UCR was 6 % (95 %CI 5–7 %). The risk of composite adverse outcome was similar using the first or subsequent UCR values. Conclusion An abnormal UCR is likely to be abnormal again at a later measurement, while after a normal UCR the chance of an abnormal UCR is 5–7 % when repeated weekly. Repeated measurements do not predict outcome better than the first measurement, most likely due to the most compromised fetuses being delivered after an abnormal UCR.
    Type of Medium: Online Resource
    ISSN: 0172-4614 , 1438-8782
    Language: English
    Publisher: Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Publication Date: 2023
    detail.hit.zdb_id: 2028670-3
    SSG: 12
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. Further information can be found on the KOBV privacy pages